身體活動介入對科技職場員工健康促進效果之研究

The Effects of Science and Technology Worksite Exercise Promotion Program for Health

10.6127/JEPF.2007.05.11

盧淑雲(Shu-Yun Lu)

運動健康促進 ； 規律運動 ； 健康危險因子 ； 健康體能 ； Community exercise promotion ； Regular exercise ； Health risk factor ； Health-related fitness

運動生理暨體能學報

5輯（2006 / 12 / 07）

103 - 115

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討運動健康促進計畫的介入，對於健康體能認知、健康體能及健康危險因子的影響。以新竹科學園區98 名園區居民做為受試對象，平均年齡33.056.55歲，身高164.208.45公分，體重60.9110.33公斤；並將受試者隨機分派至實驗組48名與控制組50名。實驗前各組分別進行健康體能認知與健康危險因子問卷調查、健康體能測驗及健康危險因子評估；經六個月運動健康促進計畫的介入後，再實施實驗後的健康評估。資料經統計分析後發現健康體能中的關節柔軟度與健康危險因子中的心血管疾病危險因素，有顯著改善的效果。顯見職場的規律運動健康促進計畫，對健康體能的提升與降低健康危險因子的效果方深具意義。惟計畫中的「運動介入」模式，未能在肌力/肌耐力、身體組成與心肺功能效果上獲致應有的發展，應屬執行活動處方設計的問題，同時也提供未來在運動健康促進計畫的規劃上，必須強調職場型態的特性、工作部門及職工的涉入程度，始能將運動健康促進計畫有效融入生活之中，而另一個必需考量的因素則是需要較長時間的持續活動，才能在健康體能與健康促進上得到廣泛效果的改善。

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effects of community exercise promotion program for health on health-related fitness, fitness cognition, and health risk factors. Subjects of this study were 98 residents (33.05±6.55 yr., 164±8.45 cm, 60.91±10.33 Kg) from Hsin-chu Scientific Park, who were assigned randomly to experimental group (n=48) and control group (n=50). The health-related fitness cognition questionnaire, health-related fitness field test, and blood for biochemical analysis of health risk factors were performed before and after community exercise promotion program for six months in both experimental and control groups. Data in this study was calculated and found that flexibility and coronary heart disease of health risk factors were improved significantly. It indicated that community exercise promotion program could be benefit for health-related fitness and decrease of health risk factors. However, muscular strength, muscular endurance, cardiorespiratory endurance, and body composition in this study intervened by exercise promotion program were not improved significantly. It seems reasonable to interpret these findings as an indication that community exercise promotion program was not executed thoroughly. Meanwhile, it suggested that further research in exercise promotion program for health have to emphasize on characteristic of community style, job organization, and intervention of residents in order to integrate exercise promotion program for health into life. Besides, another consideration would be the prolongation of exercise promotion program period for improvement of health and health-related fitness.

1. American College of Sports Medicine(1995).ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing & prescription.Philadelphia:Williams and Wilkins.
2. American College of Sports Medicine(2000).ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing & Prescription.Baltimore:Williams and Wilkins.
3. Blair, S. N.,Kohl, H. W.,Paffenbarger, R. S.,Clark, D. G.,Cooper, K. H.,Gibbons, L.W.(1989).Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: A prospective study of healthy men and women.Journal of American Medicine Association,262(17),2395-2401.
4. Blair, S. N.,Piserchia, P. V.,Wilbur, C. S.,Crowder, J. H.(1986).Apublic health intervention model for work-site health promotion: impact on exercise and physical fitness in a health promotion plan after 24 months.Journal of American Medicine Association,255(7),921-926.
5. Blake, S. M.,Jeffery, R. W.,Finnegan, J. R.,Crow, R. S.,Pirie, P. L.,Ringhofer, K. R.,Fruetel, J. R.,Caspersen, C. J.,Mittelmark, M. B.(1987).Process evaluation of a community-based physical activity campaign: the Minnesota Heart Health Program experience.Health Education Research,2(2),115-121.
6. Farquhar, J.W.,Fortmann, S. P.,Flora, J. A.,Taylor, C. B.,Haskell, W. L.,Williams, P. T.,Maccoby, N.,Wood P. D.(1990).Effects of community wide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors: The Stanford five-city project.Journal of American Medicine Association,264(3),359-365.
7. Farquhar, J.W.,Fortmann, S. P.,Maccoby, N.,Haskell, W. L.,Williams, P. T.,Flora, J. A.,Taylor, C. B.,Brown, B.W.,Solomon, D. S.,Hulley, S. B.(1985).The Stanford five-city project: design and methods.American Journal of Epidemiology,122(2),323-334.
8. Lee, C.,Owen, N.(1986).Community exercise program: follow-up difficulty and outcome.Journal of Behavioral Medicine,9(1),111-117.
9. Michael, E. D.,Husen, T. (eds),Postlethwaite, T. N. (eds)(1985).The International Encyclopedia of Education: Rresearch & Studies.Oxford:
10. Sharkey, B. J.(1990).Physiology of fitness.Champaign IL:Human Kinetics.
11. 王蕙雯(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣大學護理學研究所。
12. 行政院衛生署(1996)。促進國民健康體能指引。行政院衛生署。
13. 行政院體育委員會(1998)。國民體能檢測實務手冊。台北:行政院體育委員會。
14. 行政院體育委員會(2001)。簡易運動篇。行政院體育委員會委託國立台南師範學院。
15. 林作慶(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系。
16. 邱靜如、劉貴雲(2003)。職場員工對健康促進活動認知、態度、需求、參與情形與健康生活型態之現況及相關因素探討。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，23，29-42。
17. 陳祈維(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班。
18. 陳進明、林忠順(2004)。職場健康體能健康促進計劃的成效評估。中華職業醫學雜誌，11(4)，209-215。
19. 黃奕清、高毓秀、陳秋蓉、徐儆暉(2003)。運動計畫介入職場員工運動階段與身體活動之成效。勞工安全衛生研究季刊，11(1)，1-10。
20. 戴彰佑(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院體育學系碩士班。
21. 鍾凱婷(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北醫學院公共衛生學研究所。

1. 戴遐齡,賴長琦,黃世傑,曾暐晉,陳重文(2019)。智慧健康服務對職場員工之健康促進與體適能的效益。大專體育學刊，21(3)，271-282。
2. 黃健富、林貴福(2010)。職場健康生活形態面向之分析。輔仁大學體育學刊，9，274-284。
3. 黃健富、林貴福(2010)。職場健康生活形態面向之分析。輔仁大學體育學刊，9，274-284。
4. 詹元碩、吳孟恬(2011)。不同知覺動作訓練週期對高齡者平衡控制能力之成效分析。長榮運動休閒學刊，5，21-37。