新六都家庭溫室氣體排放研究

Study on household’s greenhouse gas emissions of new six municipalities

彭開瓊(Kai-Chiung PENG)；傅孟臺(Meng-Tai FU)；陳志堅(Zhi-Jian CHEN)；蘇娟儀(Juan-Yi SU)

六都 ； 家庭用電 ； 溫室氣體 ； new six municipalities ； household ； greenhouse gas emissions

國際文化研究

10卷2期（2014 / 12 / 01）

45 - 62

繁體中文

2014年年底台灣地區進入新六都時代，六都的環境與能源議題，深具研究價值，本文根據問卷資料與查詢台電公司電表，進行家庭用電產生溫室氣體之相關探討。研究結果顯示，以住宅類別來看，在公寓、大廈、連棟透天部分，臺南市均為排放量為最少的都市。以各種指標之溫室氣體排放量來看，六都家庭每月所得均溫室氣體介於48.4363~68.9255（Kg CO_2/萬元），每月人均溫室氣體介於68.2664~84.6892（Kg CO_2/人），每月坪均溫室氣體介於5.6392~8.6032（度電/坪數）且在所得均溫室氣體方面，高雄市、台中市與新北市較低，人均溫室氣體方面，桃園市、台中市與台南市較低。坪均溫室氣體方面，台中市、台南市與高雄市較低，可做為其他都市學習楷模。

The ends of 2014, Taiwan have entered new six municipalities, it’s environmental and energy issues have research value. According to the survey data, did household greenhouse gas emissions in new six municipalities. The results showed that aspect of residential, Tainan is less greenhouse gas emissions of city in apartment, buildings, and townhouses. However, greenhouse gas emissions of various indicators, the average income of greenhouse gases between 48.4363~68.9255(Kg CO_2/ thousand), per capita of greenhouse gases between 68.2664 ~ 84.6892 (Kg CO_2 / person), floor average of greenhouse gases between 5.6392 ~ 8.6032 (kWh / floor). Therefore, Kaohsiung, Taichung and New Taipei are low in the average income of greenhouse gases; Taoyuan, Taichung and Tainan are low in per capita of greenhouse gases; Taichung, Tainan and Kaohsiung are low in floor average of greenhouse gases.

1. 吳桂陽、孫國勛、黃國倉(2012)。降低建築溫室氣體排放之因應策略。建築學報，80，45-69。
   連結：
2. 林憲德、王仁俊、沈如龍、陳建富、邱清泉(2004)。台南市住宅區街廓透天住宅用電解析。都市與計劃，31(3)，215-237。
   連結：
3. Bölük, Gülden,Mert, Mehmet(2014).Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU(European Union) countries.Energy,74,439-446.
4. Carroll, James,Lyons, Seán,Denny, Eleanor(2014).Reducing household electricity demand through smart metering: The role of improved information about energy saving.Energy Economics,45,234-243.
5. Gaspar, R.,Antunes, D.(2011).Energy efficiency and appliance purchases in Europe: Consumer profiles and choice determinants.Energy Policy,39(11),7335-7346.
6. Mills, B.,Schleich, J.(2010).What's driving energy efficient appliance label awareness and purchase propensity?.Energy Policy,38(2),814-825.
7. Musango, Josephine Kaviti(2014).Household electricity access and consumption behaviour in an urban environment: The case of Gauteng in South Africa.Energy for Sustainable Development
8. Pukšec, Tomislav,Vad Mathiesen, Brian,Novosel, Tomislav,Duiæ, Neven(2014).Assessing the impact of energy saving measures on the future energy demand and related GHG(greenhouse gas) emission reduction of Croatia.Energy,76,198-209.
9. Sobrino, Natalia,Monzon, Andres(2014).The impact of the economic crisis and policy actions on GHG emissions from road transport in Spain.Energy Policy,74,486-498.
10. Soni, Peeyush,Taewichit, Chakkrapong,Salokhe, Vilas M.(2013).Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in rainfed agricultural production systems of Northeast Thailand.Agricultural Systems,116,25-36.
11. Sözen, Adnan,Gülseven, Zafer,Arcaklioðlu, Erol(2007).Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies.Energy Policy,35(12),6491-6505.
12. Wijaya, Muhammad Ery,Tezuka, Tetsuo(2013).A comparative study of households' electricity consumption characteristics in Indonesia: A techno-socioeconomic analysis.Energy for Sustainable Development,17(6),596-604.
13. Yohanis Y. G.(2012).Domestic energy use and householders' energy behaviour.Energy Policy,41,654-665.
14. 王淑音(2005)。國內外家畜禽糞尿處理溫室氣體排放之調查。華岡農科學報，16，51-68。
15. 馬公勉(2009)。日本溫室氣體排放狀況與減量政策。臺灣經濟研究月刊，32(9)，67-73。
16. 張四立、謝維晃(2009)。我國商業與服務業部門能源效率指標之建置與節約能源成效評估。科技發展政策報導，4，29-50。
17. 陳守泓、黃俊騰、范鈞翔、姚銘輝、申雍(2011)。稻藁掩埋處理對水田溫室氣體排放影響之研究。土壤與環境，14(1&2)，15-30。