英文摘要
|
Purpose: To analyze the scoring techniques on electronic protector and scoring system (PSS) of 2012 London Olympics and 2014 Incheon Asian Games male and female semi-finalists in Taekwondo. Research method: 24 athletes from 20 matches in the fly and feather categories from the London Olympics and 32 athletes from 24 matches in the fin, fly, bantam, and feather weight categories from the Incheon Asian Games were chosen as subjects. The subjects were observed and the scoring techniques they used were recorded. Statistical analysis method: Descriptive statistics and independent t test. Results: 1) Analysis on attacking techniques: (I) Number of kicks and techniques used to score: Back leg turning kick were the most used and with the highest scoring rate for both the Olympics and Asian Games; spinning back kick were used the least but in the Asian Games, there were many spinning attacks but most of them scored zero points. (II) Rate of effective scoring: Back leg turning kick had the highest rate of scoring for both Olympics and Asian Games; the lowest (zero points) techniques were spinning back kick for Olympics and for Asian Games there were spinning back kick and spinning turning kick. 2) Analysis on attacking mode: (I) Back leg turning kick were the most used for active attacking mode and spinning back kick were the least used for both Olympics and Asian Games. (II) For defensive mode, turning kick were the most used in the Olympics and front leg turning kick were the most used in Asian Games. Whereas back leg side kick and spinning back thrust were the least used in Olympics and Asian Games. 3) Analysis on different scoring techniques: (I) it was found that there was difference in the technique names used among different categories and regions by gender. (II) It was found that there was difference in the category, region, attacking mode, number of rounds, gender, weight categories in the type of competition. Conclusion: It was recommended that turning kick for both legs should be strengthened, and for Dae-Do system simple touch and friction will be sufficient and strength is not necessary, whereas KP&P focuses mainly on the accuracy and strength of the attacking leg.
|