評析Schmidt「論述制度論」與對政策制訂的啟示

Analysis of Schmidt's Discursive Institutionalism and Its Implication for Policy Making

陳嫈郁(René Ying-Yu Chen)

理念變因 ； 新制度論 ； 論述制度論 ； 協調論述 ； 溝通論述 ； 前景論述能力 ； 背景理念能力 ； ideas ； new institutionalism ； discursive institutionalism ； coordinative discourse ； communicative discourse ； foreground discursive abilities ； background ideational abilities

台灣國際研究季刊

10卷4期（2014 / 12 / 01）

145 - 179

繁體中文

學者Vivien Schmidt提出「論述制度論」試圖矯治原來三種新制度論過度結構化的傾向以及受限於路徑依賴、文化規範與固定利益計算等因素，因此無法對於行為者自主與自發性的行動與決策提出合理解釋的缺陷。Schmidt認為制度分析必須從行為者理念與論述的實質內涵分析著手，才能將政策理念的通則化層次釐清。其次，政策理念的傳達必需重視政策面的協調論述，取得政治菁英的共識。同時，必須注重從上到下的溝通論述，始能將理念傳達至市民社會與草根大眾，獲得共識與實踐能力。本文認為政策理念的語言論述能力考驗現代民主國家執政能力，如果執政政府未能對政策理念進行有效的論述建構，政策將無法獲得成功的實踐。Schmidt提出論述制度論後受到學界廣泛的注意，尤其對於民主國家政策制訂過程在政策溝通、民意表徵與公民參與的重要性甚具啟發性。

Vivien Schmidt has posited a discursive institutionalism as the forth new institutionalism. It claims the epoch of ＂ideational turn＂, and integrate cognitive psychology into her analytic frameworks as an independent variable for explanation. Schmidt takes ideas as operationalized and verified variable to remedy the tendential structuralism and positivism in three new institutionalism approaches. In so doing, ideational variable or ideas are brought back into new institutionalism as a reflection of autonomous agent. This paper aims to provide a clear image on Schmidt's interpretation of what is ideas and discourse, and anatomize the analytic framework in discursive institutionalism. The importance of the content of ideas and discourse, the discursive interaction and deliberative discourse for policy making process are emphasized.

1. 陳嫈郁(2012)。治理理論與國家職能的辯證：英國觀點。政治科學論叢，53，1-52。
   連結：
2. 6 Perri. 1997. Holistic Government. (http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Holistic-goverment.pdf.)
3. Baumgartnerm, Frank R.,Jones, Bryan D.(1993).Agenda and Instability in American Politics.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
4. Béland, Daniel(2010).The Ideas of Power and the Role of Ideas.Political Studies Reviews,8(2),145-54.
5. Béland, Daniel(ed.),Cox, Robert Henny(ed.)(2011).Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
6. Béland, Daniel(ed.),Cox, Robert Henny(ed.)(2010).Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
7. Beland, Daniel(ed.),Cox, Robert Henry(ed.)(2011).Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
8. Blyth, Mark(2003).Structures Do Not Come With an Instruction Sheet: Interest, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.Perspectives on Politics,1(4),695-706.
9. Blyth, Mark(1997).Any More Bright Ideas?': The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy.Comparative Politics,29(2),229-50.
10. Blyth, Mark(2002).Great Transformation: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Bourdieu Pierre(1990).In Other Words: Essays toward a Reflexive Sociology.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
12. Bourdieu Pierre(1994).Reason Practices.Paris:Le Seuil.
13. Campbell, John(ed.),Pedersen, Ove(ed.)(2001).The Rise of Neo-liberalism and Institutional Analysis.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
14. Cox, Robert H.(2001).The Path Dependency of An Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct.Social Policy Administration,38(2),204-19.
15. Davies, J. S.(2009).Re-stating Hegemony: A Critique of Postmodern Governance Theory.City Future Conference,Madrid:
16. De Ville, Ferdi,Orbie, Jan(2013).The European Commission's Neoliberal Trade Discourse Since the Crisis: Legitimizing Continuity Through Subtle Discursive Change.British Journal of Politics and International Relations,16(1),149-67.
17. Dryzek, John S.(2000).Deliberative Democracy and Beyond.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Finnemore, Martha(1996).Norms, Culture, and Wor ld Politics: Insights Form Sociology's Institutionalism.International Organization,50(2),325-47.
19. Fischer, Frank(ed.),Gottweis, Herbert(ed.)(2012).The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy ad Communicative Practice.London:Duck University Press.
20. Foucault Michael,Faubion, J. D.(ed.)(2000).Power, Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984.New York:New Press.
21. Giddens, Anthony(1984).The Construction of Society.Cambridge:Polity.
22. Goodin, Robert E.(ed.)(1998).The Theory of Institutional Design.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Gramsci Antonio(1971).Selections from the Prison Notebooks.New York:International Publish.
24. Grindle, Merilee S.(2004).Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries.Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration,89(1),156-66.
25. Haas Peter M.(1992).Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.International Organization,46,1-35.
26. Habermas, Jürgen(1996).Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory.London:Polity.
27. Habermas, Jürgen,Burger, T.(trans.),Lawrence, F.(trans.)(1989).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
28. Hajer, Maarten A.(ed.),Wagenaar, Hendrik(ed.)(2003).Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
29. Hall, Peter A.,Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1996).Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.Political Studies,44(5),936-57.
30. Hall, Peter A.,Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1998).The Potential of Historical Institutionalism: A Response to Hay and Wincott.Political Studies,46(5),958-62.
31. Hay, Colin(2002).Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction.London:Palgrave.
32. Hay, Colin(ed.),Lister, Michael(ed.),Marsh, David(ed.)(2006).The State Theories and Issues.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Hay, Colin,Wincott, Daniel(1996).Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism.Political Studies,46(5),951-57.
34. Immergut, Ellen M.(1998).The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.Politics and Society,26(1),5-34.
35. Janet, Newman(ed.)(2005).Remaking Governance-People, Polity and the Public Sphere.Bristol:Policy Press.
36. Jobert, Bob(1989).The Normative Framework Of Public Policy.Political Studies,37,376-86.
37. Landman, Todd(ed.),Robinson, Neil(ed.)(2009).The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics.London:Sage Publication.
38. Lynch, Cecelia(2008).Reflexivity in Research on Civil Society: Constructivist Perspectives.International Studies Review,10(4),708-21.
39. Marsh, David(ed.),Stoker, Gerry(ed.)(2002).Theory and Methods in Political Science.London:Palgrave Macmillan Press.
40. Mutz, Diana C,Sniderman, Paul M.,Brody, Richard A.(1996).Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
41. North, Dauglass(2006).Understanding the Process of Economic Change.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
42. Rhodes, R. A. W.(ed.),Binde, Sarah(ed.),Rockman, Bert(ed.)(2006).The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions.Oxford:The Oxford University Press.
43. Rosamond, B.(2013).Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and The EU's Normative Power.British Journal of politics and International Relations,16,1133-48.
44. Sabatier, Paul A.(ed.),Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.(ed.)(1993).Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach.Boulder, Colo.:Westview.
45. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2008).Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.Annual Review of Political Science,11,303-26.
46. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2010).Analyzing Ideas and Tracing Discursive Interactions In Institutional Change: From Historical Institutionalism to Discursive Institutionalism.APSA 2010 Annual Meeting
47. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2010).Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism As The Fourth 'New Institutionalism'.European Political Science Review,2(1),1-25.
48. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2006).Bringing the State Back Into the Varieties of Capitalism and Discourse Back Into the Explanation of Change.Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association,Philadelphia:
49. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2012).A Curious Constructivism: A Response to Professor Bell.British Journal of Political Science,42(3),705-713.
50. Schmidt, A. Vivien(2013).Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU's Sovereign Debt Crisis.British Journal of Politics and International Relations,16(1),188-209.
51. Searle, John R.(1995).The Construction of Social Reality.New York:Free Press.
52. Stone, Deborah A.(1988).Policy Paradox and Political Reason.Glenview, Ill:Scott Foresman.
53. Telo, M.(ed.)(2012).State, Globalization and Multilateralism: The Challenges of Institutionalizing Regionalism.New York:Springer Science + Business Media.
54. Wendt, Alexander E.(1987).The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations.International Organization,41(3),335-70.
55. 林繼文(2001)。創設、選擇與演化：制度形成的三個理論模式。政治學報，32，61-93。
56. 徐斯勤(2001)。新制度主義與當代中國政治研究：理論與應用之間對話的初步觀察。政治學報，32，95-169。
57. 郭承天(2000)。新制度論與政治經濟學。邁入二十一世紀的政治學，台北:
58. 陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫倩如(2006)。社會心理學。台北:雙葉書廊。

1. 胡琇雰(2016)。台灣電價調整政策之論述分析—2012年至2016年。國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文。2016。1-94。