题名

美國的宗教土地使用國會的立法與法院的判例

并列篇名

Religious Land Use in the United States: Legislations and Court Cases

作者

施正鋒(Cheng-Feng Shih)

关键词

宗教土地使用 ； 宗教自由 ； 土地徵收 ； 判例 ； religious land use ； freedom of religion ； eminent domain ； RLUIPA ； court cases

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

12卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

页次

135 - 175

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在這裡，我們想要透過美國國會的立法、以及各級法院的判例，來了解政府對於宗教土地使用的作法；具體而言，我們想要知道，當地方政府的土地管制、甚至於徵收侵犯到人民的宗教自由之際，國會及法院採取怎麼樣的態度。我們先將了解土地對於宗教信仰的重要性、以及反對立法保障宗教土地使用的理由；接著，我們要回顧美國國會與聯邦最高法院針對這個議題的長期拔河；再來，我們要介紹RLUIPA的內容，特別是關鍵的概念；其次，我們將探討土地使用法規涉及是否包含土地徵收；在結語之前，我們要考察一些在RLUIPA立法以後的判例。
英文摘要

In this article, we explore how the American government has dealt with the issues of religious land use through Congressional legislations and judicial interpretations by court cases. Specifically, we look into how the legislative and the judicial branches have expressed themselves when religious lands are taken by the local government via eminent domain and whether the peoples’ freedom of religion of the people has been infringed. We shall start with an understanding of the importance of lands to freedom of religion and the rationales underlying the oppositions against any attempts at regulating religious land uses. After reviewing the tug-of-war between Congress and the Supreme Court on this issue over the years, we shall introduce the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) passed in 2000 with a special focus on some key concepts. In addition, we will examine whether eminent domain is under the jurisdiction of land use regulations. Before we come to the conclusions, we will also investigate some court cases after the promulgation of the RLUIPA.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Blumenthal, Ralph. 2006. "Humble Church Is at Center of Debate on Eminent Domain." New York Times, January 25 (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/national/25depot.html?_r=0) (2012/10/26)
  2. Giaimo, Michael S. 2004. "Summary of Land Use Case Law under Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act." (http://www.rc.com/documents/LandUse CaseLaw%20Giaimo.doc) (2012/10/30)
  3. 郝雪卿，2012。〈反對南屯天主堂重劃，教友遊行〉《中央社新聞網》5 月26 日（http://www.cna.com.tw/News/aLOC/201205260171.aspx）（2012/ 10/16）。
  4. Williams, Joseph P., and Amy E. Souchuns. 2003. "Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000." (http://www.Shipmangoodwin.com/files/Publication/7829583a-4f62-4a3c-8b2e-3a6c721558df/Presentation/Publication Attachment/9bd8f6a7-7a35-41c5-a783-538bdf0a9a8d/religious_land_use.pdf)(2012/10/30)
  5. 《聖經》〈列王紀（上）〉（http://www.ccreadbible.org/Chinese%20Bible/sigao/1_Kings_bible_Ch_21_.html）（2012/10/16）。
  6. Horner, Roger. 2006. "Land Use Decisions Under the. Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000: A Guide to RLUIPA." (http://www.tmaa.us/pdfs/rluipa.pdf) (2012/10/19)
  7. 吳佳玲、張嘉慧，2012。〈2011 台灣教勢報告，基督徒人口5.44%〉《今日基督教報》9 月12 日（http://news.dhf.org.tw/News.aspx?cate=01&key=2788）（2012/10/16）。
  8. 庄仔，2008。〈五叔的二兒子庄谷峰要結婚了〉（http://jimmyzhuang.blogbus.com/logs/2008/01/d28.html）（2012/10/18）。
  9. 劉振忠，n.d.。〈浴火重生的西螺天主堂〉《新聖堂落成紀念冊》（http://www.cdd.org.tw/Costantinian/508/50818.htm）（2012/10/18）。
  10. Wenliang（Wen-Liang Chen），1995。〈哀，教友死諫〉（http://bbs.nsysu.edu.tw/txtVersion/boards/catholic-youth/M.809424442.A.html）（2012/10/18）。
  11. 天主教會台灣地區主教團， 2010。〈2010 年台灣地區天主教會教務統計表〉（http://www.catholic.org.tw/catholic/2012/New%20Book/2012HandBook/2010Statistics.pdf）（2012/10/16）。
  12. 賴春標，2001。〈山刀出鞘─記東埔挖抗[墳]議事件〉（http://www.abohome.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=597:records-record16-597&catid=47:record15&Itemid=246）（2012/10/21）
  13. 施曉光、范正群，2012。〈同為民請命，她行他碰壁：李鴻源獨厚高金？廖國棟不平〉《自由時報》10 月21 日（http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/oct/21/today-t3.htm）（2012/10/21）。
  14. Wikipedia. 2012. "Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. "(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Land_Use_and_Institutionalized_Persons_Act)(2012/10/30)
  15. Alden, Bram(2010).Reconsidering RLUIPA: Do Religious Land Use Protections Really Benefit Religious Land Users?.UCLA Law Review,57,1779-818.
  16. Antos, Karen L.(2008).A Higher Authority: How the Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Affects State Control over Religious Land Use Conflicts.Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,35,557-91.
  17. Baker, Matthew(2008).RLUIPA and Eminent Domain: Probing the Boundaries of Religious Land Use Protection.Brigham Young University Law Review,2008(4),1213-42.
  18. Bollettino, Vikki(2009).The Quest for Congruence: Why the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Should Apply to Eminent Domain.Seton Hall Law Review,39(4),1263-97.
  19. Carmella, Angela C.(2009).RLUIPA: Linking Religion, Land Use, Ownership and the Common Good.Albany Government Law Review,2,485-536.
  20. Carnell, E. Darren(2002).Zoning Churches: Washington State Constitutional Limitations on the Application of Land Use Regulations to Religious Buildings.Seattle University Law Review,25,699-729.
  21. Chaffee, Karla L.,Merriam, Dwight H.(2009).Six Fact Patterns of Substantial Burden in RLUIPA: Lessons for Potential Litigants.Albany Government Law Review,2,437-83.
  22. Crisalli, Noelle(2005).Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v. City of Chicago: A Defining Case for the Substantial Burden Test under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act..Pace Environmental Law Review,23,263-87.
  23. Dalton, Daniel(2010).The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act-Recent Development.Urban Lawyer,42(3),561-80.
  24. David, Robin M.(2006).GOD v. WAL-MART: The Battle over the 'Better Use' of Land: Has the Supreme Court Allowed for Economic Development at the Cost if Invaluable Religious Rights?.Penn State Law Review,111(1),239-61.
  25. Doyle, Martin,Felder, David(2008).Condemnation of Church Property resents Unique Legal Issues.Legal Intelligencer
  26. Finetti, Cristina(2008).Limiting the Scope of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act: Why RLUIPA Should Not Be Amended to Regulate Eminent Domain Actions Against Religious Property.Seton Hall Law Review,38,667-713.
  27. Gerwig-Moore, Sarah(2012).Saving Their Own Souls: How RLUIPA Failed to Deliver on Its Promises.Legislation and Policy Review,4(1),119-58.
  28. Glover, Andrew(2011).The Pit and the Pendulum: How Far Can RLUIPA Go in Protecting the Amish?.Penn State Environmental Law Review,19(1),109-30.
  29. Haddad, Nicholas William(2006).Public Use or Private Benefit? The Post-Kelo Intersection of Religious Land Use and the Public Use Doctrine.Fordham Law Review,75,1105-42.
  30. Hamilton, Marci A.(2009).The Constitutional Limitations on Congress's Power over Local Land Use: Why the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Is Unconstitutional.Albany Government Law Review,2(2),366-436.
  31. Hatch, Orrin,Kennedy, Ted(2000).Not Land Use Immunity.Congressional Record,146(2)
  32. Infranca, John(2012).Institutional Free Exercise and Religious Land Use.New York University, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers,322
  33. Kamptner, Greg(2012).The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook.Albemarle County, Va.:County Attorney's Office.
  34. Laycock, Douglas,Goodrich, Luke W.(2012).University of Virginia School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research PaperUniversity of Virginia School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper,未出版
  35. Lennington, Daniel P.(2006).Thou Shalt Not Zone: The Overbroad Applications and Troubling Implications of RLUIPA's Land Use Provisions.Seattle University Law Review,29,805-42.
  36. Leomczyk, Canon Kenneth G., Jr..RLUIPA and Eminent Domain: How a Plain Reading of a Flawed Statue Creates an Absurd Result.Texas Review of Law and Politics,13,311-64.
  37. Lerman, Daniel N.(2008).Taking the Temple: Eminent Domain and the Limits of RLUIPA.Georgetown Law Journal,96,2057-101.
  38. MacLeod, Adam J.(2010).A Non-Fatal Collision: Interpreting RLUIPA Where Religious Land Uses and Community Interests Meet.Urban Lawyer,12(1)
  39. MacLeod, Adam J.(2011).Resurrecting the Bogeyman: The Curious Forms of the Substantial Burden Test in RLUIPA.Real Estate Law Journal,40
  40. Mathues, G. David(2006).Shadow of a Bulldozer?: RLUIPA and Eminent Domain after Kelo.Notre Dome Law Review,81(4),1653-96.
  41. Ostrow, Ashira Pelman(2008).Judicial Review of Local Land Use Decisions: Lessons from RLUIPA.Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,31,717-60.
  42. Owens, David W.(2009).Regulation of Religious Land Uses.the City Attorneys Conference
  43. Raccuis, Thomas E.(2012).RLUIPA and Exclusionary Zoning: Government Defendants Should Have the Burden of Persuasion in Equal Terms Cases.Fordham Law Review,80,1853-88.
  44. Reilly, Elizabeth(2009).Akron Research PaperAkron Research Paper,未出版
  45. Rice, Terry(1988).Re-Evaluating the Balance between Zoning Regulations and Religious and Educational Uses.Pace law Review,8(1),1-61.
  46. Saxer, Shelley Ross(1995).When Religion Becomes a Nuisance: Balancing Land Use and Religious Freedom When Activities of Religious Institutions Bring Outsiders into the Neighborhood.Kentucky Law Journal,84,507-52.
  47. Saxer, Shelley Ross(2004).Eminent Domain Actions Targeting First Amendment Land Uses.Missouri Law Review,69,653-95.
  48. Saxer, Shelley Ross(2009).Assessing RLUIPA's Application to Building Codes and Aesthetic Land Use Regulation.Albany Government Law Review,2,623-52.
  49. Scaduto, Allison(2008).RLUIPA as a Possible Shield from the Government Taking of Religious Property.Seton Hall Law Review,38,823-57.
  50. Serkin, Christopher,Tebbe, Nelson(2009).Condemning Religion: RLUIPA and the Politics of Eminent Domain.Notre Dame Law Review,85(1),1-54.
  51. Smolik, Sara(2004).The Utility and Efficacy of the RLUIPA: Was It a Waste?.Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,31,723-59.
  52. Stout, Kelli(2011).Tent Cities and RLUIPA: How New Religious Land-Use Issue Aggravates RLUIPA.Seton Hall Law Review,41,465-99.
  53. Tuttle, Robert W.(2000).How Firm a Foundation? Protecting Religious Land Use after Boerne.George Washington Law Review,68,861-924.
  54. Weinstein, Alan C.(2012).The Effect of RLUIPA's Land Use Provisions on Local Government.Fordham Urban Law Journal,39
  55. Weiss, Jonathan D.,Lowell, Randy(2002).Supersizing Religion: Megachurches, Sprawl, and Smart Growth.Saint Louis University Public Law Review,21,313-29.
  56. Ziegler, Edward H.(2009).University of Denver Legal Studies Research PaperUniversity of Denver Legal Studies Research Paper,未出版
  57. 陳韋鑑(2012)。南屯天主堂，每月打卡抗議重劃。台灣教會公報
  58. 陳振貴(2012)。支持526 南屯天主堂遊行祈福。天主教博愛會刊，78，4。
  59. 傅恩平(2000)。馬赫俊神父2000 年台灣紀行。台灣教會公報，2545
print cancel