题名

菲律賓的族群圖像與政策

并列篇名

Multicultural Politics of the Philippines

作者

謝國斌(Kuo-Pin Hsieh)

关键词

菲律賓 ; 族群政治 ; 少數族群 ; the Philippines ; ethnic politics ; ethnic minority

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

12卷4期(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

55 - 79

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

菲律賓是一個多元族群的國家,本文是一篇探索性與描述性的文章,目的在探究菲律賓的族群圖像以及語言和少數族群等主要族群政策。在族群圖像方面,本文發現菲律賓的族群歧異主要體現在語言與宗教層面;其中語言族群的分布與其分散的地理區域有密切的關聯性,至於宗教信仰則大致上與過去的殖民經驗有關。在語言政策方面,在獨立建國初期,菲律賓的語言政策圍繞在國語的選定與官方語言的認定上;而當代則有母語教育的議題。至於少數族群政策則規範於憲法裡,並體現在自治區的設立,以及原住民族權利的承認上。

英文摘要

The Philippines is a multiethnic country with diverse cultural characteristics, which are mainly represented in terms of ethno-linguistic and religious differences. The primary purpose of this paper aims to depict the Philippines’s ethnic composition as well as to analyze its major ethnic policies, including language policy and policy toward ethnic minorities. The major findings include: First, the Philippines’s ethnic cleavages were shaped by scattered geographical locations as well as colonial experiences. Second, the selection and reaffirmation of national language and official languages was the major issue of language politics in the 20^(th) century, while the politics about mother tongue education has come on stage contemporarily. Third, the ethnic minority issues of the Philippines are regulated as a constitutional-level policy, which is primarily practiced in the establishment of autonomous regions and recognition of indigenous rights.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 謝國斌(2013)。新加坡的族群政治。台灣國際研究季刊,9(1),33-58。
    連結:
  2. Dait-Cawed, Dahlialyn D. n.d. “An Introduction to The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997: An IP Human Rights Based Policing Framework.”(http://hrao.pnp.gov.ph/images/downloads/IPRALAW.pdf) (2016/8/26)
  3. Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA). 2016. “Highlights of the Philippine Population 2015 Census of Population.” (https://psa.gov.ph/content/highlightsphilippine-population-2015-census-population) (2016/8/25)
  4. Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 1987 (http://www.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/) (2016/8/25)
  5. Ethnologue. n.d. “Philippines.” Ethnologue: Languages of the World. (https://www. ethnologue.com/country/PH) (2016/8/29)
  6. National Statistics Office. 2014. “Philippines in Figures 2014.” (http://web0.psa. gov.ph/sites/default/files/2014%20PIF.pdf) (2016/8/27)
  7. Taglog Lang. n.d. “Filipino? Tagalog? Pilipino?” (http://tagaloglang.com/filipinotagalog-pilipino/) (2016/8/31)
  8. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs(IWGIA). n.d. “Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines.” (http://www.iwgia.org/regions/asia/philippines) (2016/12/9)
  9. National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. n.d. “Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines.” (http://ncipro67.com.ph/indigenous-peoples-of-the-philippines/)(2016/8/26)
  10. Ranada, Pia. 2016. “Duterte: I Shot a Bully San Beda Law Student.” (http://www. rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2016/130284-duterte-shot-bully-san-beda-st udent) (2016/9/1)
  11. United States Department of State. 2012. “Philippines 2012 International Religious Freedom Report.” (http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/208472.pdf) (2016/9/1)
  12. Dumatog, Rose C., and Diane E. Dekker. 2003. “First Language Education in Lubuagan, Northern Philippines.” (http://www-01.sil.org/asia/ldc/parallel_papers/ dumatog_and_dekker.pdf) (2016/9/1)
  13. Congress of the Philippines. 2013. “Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013.”(http://www.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/) (2016/9/1)
  14. CIA. 2016. “Philippines.” The World Factbook (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rp.html) (2016/8/26)
  15. BBC. 2016. “Philippines: Bomb Attack on Davao Market Kills 12.” BBC News,September 3 (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37262499) (2016/9/3)
  16. Wikipedia. 2016. “Philippines.” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines) (2016/8/25)
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital (https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm.) (2015/10/11)
  18. Congress of the Philippines. 1997. “The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997.”(http://ncipro67.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/RA08371.pdf) (2016/8/26)
  19. Ashcroft, Bill,Griffiths, Gareth,Tiffin, Helen(2002).The Empire Writes Back Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures.New York:Routledge.
  20. Dawe, Christopher J.(2014).Language Governmentality in Philippine Education Policy.Working Papers in Educational Linguistics,29(1),61-77.
  21. Gagliardi, Raul(ed.)(1995).Teacher Training and Multiculturalism.Paris:UNESCO International Bureau of Education.
  22. Gera, Weena(2015).The Politics of Ethnic Representation in Philippine Bureaucracy.Ethnic and Racial Studies
  23. Gonzalez, Andrew B.(1980).Language and Nationalism: The Philippine Experience Thus Far.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  24. Hitchcock, Robert K.,Vinding, Diana(2004).Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Southern Africa.Copenhagen:International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs=IWGIA.
  25. Kuper, Adam(2003).The Return of the Native.Current Anthropology,44,389-402.
  26. Lourdes, M.A.(ed.),Bautista, S.(ed.),Bolton, Kingsley(ed.)(2009).Philippine English: Linguistic and Literary Perspectives.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.
  27. Rappa, Antonio L.,Wee, Lionel H. A.(2006).Language Policy and Modernity in Southeast Asia: Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand.New York:Springer.
  28. Schwarz, Henry(ed.),Ray, Sangeeta(ed.)(2005).A Companion to Postcolonial Studies.Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.
  29. Sercombe, Peter(ed.),Tupas, Ruanni(ed.)(2014).Language, Education and Nation-Building: Assimilation and Shift in Southeast Asia.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. Tupas, Ruanni(2015).The Politics of 'p' and 'f': A Linguistic History of Nation-building in the Philippines.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,36(6),587-97.
  31. UNESCO(2012).UNESCO Guidelineson Intercultural Education.
  32. Yamamoto, Kazuya(2007).Nation-Building and Integration Policy in the Philippines.Journal of Peace Research,44(2),195-213.
  33. 施正鋒編(2016)。人民力量革命三十年的菲律賓
被引用次数
  1. 官大偉(2020)。在地視角下的文化地景保存:以菲律賓伊富高梯田為例。地理學報,95,61-93。
  2. 謝國斌(2020)。印尼的族群政策。臺灣國際研究季刊,16(1),41-69。
  3. (2024)。多族群國家的國族打造──以東南亞國家為例。台灣國際研究季刊,20(2),1-43。