题名

改變中的新加坡集選區

并列篇名

The Changing of Singapore's Group Representation Constituency

作者

劉曉鵬(Hsiaopong Liu);黃奕維(I-Wei Huang)

关键词

集選區 ; 單選區 ; 李顯龍 ; 李光耀 ; group representation constituency ; single member constituency ; Lee Hsien Loong ; Lee Kuan Yew

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

13卷1期(2017 / 03 / 01)

页次

103 - 109+111-116+118-122

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

集選區是李光耀於1988 年設計的一種團隊參選制。這個制度將非華裔少數族群包括在較多的華人候選人中,一般認為有利於新加坡的種族和諧,更有利於執政黨。作者有二個主要論點。首先,由於錯誤假定少數族群無法在一對一的單選區中競爭,集選區制對族群和諧的助益十分有限。其次,集選區也可能有利於反對黨。這些事實解釋為何李顯龍總理必須迅速開始改革這個制度。

英文摘要

The Group Representation Constituency (GRC) is a team election system designed by Lee Kuan Yew since 1988. The system includes non-Chinese minorities in predominant Chinese candidates, and has been generally believed to be favorable to the ruling party and Singapore's racial harmony. The authors have two main arguments. First, the GRC system is not helpful to racial harmony because it erroneously assumes that non-Chinese minorities cannot win on "one-on-one" Single Member Constituency (SMC) campaign. Second, the GRC can be favorable to the opposition party. Factual evidence presented explains why Premier Lee Hsien Loong must reform this system.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 施奕任(2011)。新加坡選舉制度與政治效應:1988-2011 國會選舉分析。政治學報,52,65-99。
    連結:
  2. 翁俊桔、顧長永(2004)。2001 年新加坡國會大選評析。國家發展研究,3(2),87-116。
    連結:
  3. Channel News Asia. 2016b. “Lee Wei Ling's accusations 'completely untrue': PM Lee.” Channel News Asia, April 10 (http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/lee-wei-ling-s/2683042.html) (2016/12/14)
  4. Singapore Department of Statistics. 2016. “Basic Demographic Characteristics.” (http://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2000/census_2000_release1/excel/t1-7.xls)(2016/9/2)
  5. AsiaOne. 2011. “Singapore's new cabinet ministers sworn in.” AsiaOne, May 18 (http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20110518-279432.html) (2016/9/3)
  6. Kotkin, Joel. 2015. “Singapore After Lee Kuan Yew: Future Is Uncertain For The Utilitarian Paradise He Created.” Forbes, March 22 (http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2015/03/22/lee-kuan-yew-dead-singapore/2/#23270dd825a4) (2016/12/14)
  7. Singapore Elections Department. 2015. “Parliamentary Election Results.” (http://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_past_parliamentary.html) (2016/6/2)
  8. Singapore Elections Department. 2016b. “Parliamentary Elections Results.”(http://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_past_parliamentary.html) (2016/9/2)
  9. 吳宗泰,2014。〈原住民代表,是被保障還是被遺忘?〉《新聞E 論壇》11 月28日( http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20141128/515028/ )(2016/9/2)。
  10. Singapore Department of Statistics. 1981. Census of Population 1980 Singapore. Singapore: Department of Statistics.
  11. Singapore Department of Statistics. 2011. “Census of Population 2010.” (https://www.singstat.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/publications/publications_and_papers/cop2010/census_2010_release1/cop2010sr1.pdf ) (2016/9/2)
  12. Singapore Elections Department. 2016a. “Types of Electoral Divisions.”(http://www.eld.gov.sg/elections_type_electoral.html#group) (2016/9/2)
  13. 陳慶文,2016。〈對徐順全博士表現的不同看法〉《聯合早報》5 月11 日(http://www.80sd.org/pl/2016/05/11/98539_3.html)(2016/9/2)。
  14. BBC NEWS. 2015. “Singapore's founding father Lee Kuan Yew dies at 91.” BBC NEWS, March 23 (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32012346) (2016/12/14)
  15. 黃曉恩,2015。〈分析:後李光耀時代的新加坡何去何從?〉《BBC 中文網》3月29 日(http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world/2015/03/150329_analysis_singapore_lee-kuan-yew)(2016/12/14)
  16. Chang, Rachel. 2015. “PM Lee Hsien Loong names Cabinet aimed at leadership succession.” Straits Times, September 29 (http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/pm-lee-hsien-loong-names-cabinet-aimed-at-leadership-succession) (2016/6/2)
  17. Channel News Asia. 2016a. “PM Lee Hsien Loong moots changes to GRC, NCMP, Elected President schemes.” Channel News Asia, January 27 (http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pm-lee-hsien-loong-moots/2462182.html)(2016/6/2)
  18. 黃譯萱,2015。〈邱進益:新加坡一黨獨大有來由〉《台灣醒報》9 月10 日(https://anntw.com/articles/20150910-umO5)(2016/8/30)。
  19. Bird, Karen(2014).Ethnic Quotas and Ethnic Representation Worldwide.International Political Science Review,35(1),12-26.
  20. Bird, Karen(2012).Toward an Integrated Perspective of Minority Representation: Views from Canada.Gender and Politics,8(4),529-535.
  21. Casellas, Jason(2011).Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  22. Celis, Karen,Mazur, Amy G.(2012).Hanna Pitkin's 'Concept of Representation' Revisited.Gender and Politics,8(4),508-12.
  23. Chakrabarty, Bidyut(1989).The Communal Award of 1932 and Its Implications in Bengal.Modern Asian Studies,23(3),493-523.
  24. Chew, Melanie(1996).Leaders of Singapore.Singapore:Resource Press.
  25. Chua, S. C.(1964).Report on the Census of Population 1957.Singapore:Government Printer.
  26. Dresang, Dennis L.(1974).Ethnic Politics, Representative Bureaucracy and Development Administration: The Zambian Case.American Political Science Review,68(4),1605-17.
  27. Gay, Claudine(2001).The Effect of Minority Districts and Minority Representation on Political Participation in California.San Francisco:Public Policy Institute.
  28. Grose, Christian(2011).Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  29. Kymlicka, Will(1995).Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  30. Mathur, Raj(1997).Parliamentary Representation of Minority Communities: The Mauritian Experience.Africa Today,44(1),61-82.
  31. Miller, Raymond(1997).New Zealand Politics in Transition.New York:Oxford University Press.
  32. Minta, Michael D.(2012).Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Political Representation in the United States.Gender and Politics,8(4),541-47.
  33. Mutalib, Hussin(2012).Singapore Malays: Being Ethnic Minority and Muslim in a Global City-State.New York:Routledge.
  34. Phillips, Anne(1995).The Politics of Presence.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  35. Pitkin, Hannah F.(1967).The Concept of Representation.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  36. Tan, Kevin(1999).The Singapore Legal System.Singapore:Singapore University Press.
  37. Tan, Kevin Y.L.(2015).The Constitution of Singapore: A Contextual Analysis.Oxford:Hart Publishing Ltd.
  38. Tan, Kevin,Thio, Li-ann(2016).Singapore: 50 Constitutional Moments That Defined a Nation.Singapore:Marshall Cavendish International.
  39. Tan, Netina(2013).Multiracialism and Politics of Regulating Ethnic Relations in Singapore.annual meeting of Canadian Political Science Association,Victoria, British Columbia, Canada:
  40. Williams, Melissa S.(1998).Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failing of Liberal Representation.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  41. Young, Iris Marion(2000).Inclusion and Democracy.New York:Oxford University Press.
  42. 施正鋒(2005)。原住民族的選舉制度-少數族群的代表性的國際觀點。原住民族立委選制的展望研討會,台北:
  43. 洪鎌德、郭俊麟(1997)。從新加坡看台灣族群問題-族群和諧與共榮。族群正義與人權保障學術研討會,台北:
  44. 韋紅、謝偉民(2012)。新加坡集選區制度初探。南洋問題研究,1,47-54。
  45. 翁俊桔(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投,國立暨南國際大學東南亞研究所。
  46. 楊昊編、陳琮淵編(2013)。台灣東南亞研究新論:圖象與路向。台北:洪葉文化。
  47. 顧長永(2013)。東南亞各國政府與政治:持續與變遷。台北:台灣商務印書館。