夏威夷主權運動

The Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement

官大偉(Da-Wei Kuan)

夏威夷 ； 主權運動 ； 原住民族 ； Hawaii ； Sovereignty Movement ； Indigenous Peoples

台灣國際研究季刊

14卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

35 - 62

繁體中文

夏威夷群島在波里尼西亞地區具有重要的門戶地位，在17世紀和西方航海者接觸後，夏威夷群島發展成為一個國際承認的君主立憲國家，儘管在1893年被美國武力推翻，並於1959年經過公投成為美國的一州，但恢復夏威夷主權的聲音未曾停止，其論述超越原住民族權利的範疇，對原住民族、國家與主權之關係的思考，有深刻而具啟發性的意義。本文包含幾個部份：(1)回顧夏威夷王國的歷史、其和西方勢力之間的關係，以及被美國兼併的過程；(2)介紹夏威夷主權運動的重要事件、演變與現況，並分析其和內部政治經濟發展、太平洋島國獨立浪潮、國際原住民族運動之間的關係；(3)檢視夏威夷主權運動的影響，包括對於王國歷史的重新認識、和本土環境意識的連結，以及原住民族與國家之關係的辯證等。最後，本文並將討論夏威夷主權運動對台灣的啟發。

Hawaiian Islands distributes in a very important strategic location in the Polynesian Region. After encountering the navigators from Europe in 17th century, Hawaii Islands developed into a Constitutional monarchy country recognized in the international society. Even though the Hawaiian Kingdom was overthrown with the help of U.S. military force in 1893, and annexed as a state in 1959, the claim for restoring the Hawaiian sovereignty has never been stopped. The discourse of Hawaiian sovereignty movement goes beyond the discourse of indigenous rights, and provides insights for rethinking the relations between state and indigenous people. This article reviews the history of Hawaiian Kingdom, its relations with the Western countries, and the process of annexation. Furthermore, it describes the important events of Hawaiian sovereignty movement, its transition and current situation. This article also examines the influences of Hawaiian movement, its relevance to the decolonization process in the Pacific, and the inspiration it gives to understand the state/indigenous people relations. In the end, tit elaborates the lesson Taiwan indigenous peoples can learn from the Hawaiian experience.

1. Apology Resolution (Public Law 103-150), 1993.
2. Abbott, George(1990).Sugar.London:Routledge.
3. Ahluwalia, Pal,Knight, Roger,Ashcroft, Bill(1999).White and Deadly: Sugar and Colonialism.Hauppauge, N.Y.:Nova Science Publishers.
4. Bedor, J. Roman(2015).Palau: From the Colonial Outpost to Independent Nation.Author.
5. Chinen, Jon J.(1958).The Great Mahele: Hawaii's land division of 1848.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
6. Chinen, Jon J.(2002).They Cried For Help: The Hawaiian Land Revolution of the 1840s and 1850s.Philadelphia:Xlibris Corp.
7. Craven, Matthew(2004).Hawai'i, History and International Law.Hawaiian Journal of Law and Politics,1,6-22.
8. Crosby, Alfred W.(1972).The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492.Westport, Conn.:Greenwood Press.
9. Deloria, Vine, Jr.(ed.)(1985).American Indian Policy in the Twentieth Century.Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
10. Gray, Russell,Jordan, Fiona M.(2000).Correction: Language Trees Support the Express-Train Sequence of Austronesian Expansion.Nature,405,1052-55.
11. Hawkins, Richard A.(2006).The Impact of Sugar Cane Cultivation on the Economy and Society of Hawaii, 1835-1900.Iiles i Imperis,9,59-77.
12. Heitmann, John A.(1986).Organization as Power: The Louisiana Sugar Planters' Association and the Creation of Scientific and Technical Institutions, 1877-1910.Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association,27(3),281-94.
13. Jobs, Sebastian(ed.),Mackenthun, Gesa(ed.)(2013).Agents of Transculturation: Border-Crossers, Mediators, Go-Betweens.Münster:Waxmann.
14. Kame'eleihiwa, Lilikala(1992).Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea LA E Pono Ai?.Honolulu:Bishop Museum Press.
15. Keal, Paul(2003).European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Kirch, Patrick Vinton,Green, Roger C.(2001).Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia: An Essay in Historical Anthropology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
17. Kuykendall, Ralph S. 1938. The Hawaiian Kingdom, Vol. 1, 1778-1854: Foundation and Transformation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
18. Kuykendall, Ralph S.(1953).The Hawaiian Kingdom.Honolulu:University of Hawaii.
19. Kuykendall, Ralph S.(1967).The Hawaiian Kingdom.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
20. Manning, Anita,Vance, Justin W.(2014).Hawai'i at Home during the American Civil War.Hawaiian Journal of History,48,145-70.
21. Minton, Nālani(ed.),Silva, Noenoe K.(ed.)(1998).Kū'ē: The Hui Aloha 'Āina Anti-annexation Petitions, 1897-1898.Honolulu:N?lani Minton and Noenoe K. Silva.
22. Mintz, Sidney Wilfred(1985).Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History.New York:Viking.
23. n.a. 1976. “I.D.C. Int'l Propose Maug Superport.” Marianas Variety, November 26. Newlands Resolution, House Resolution 259.
24. Ralston, Caroline(1984).Hawaii 1778-1854: Some Aspects of Maka'ainana Response to Rapid Cultural Chang.Journal of Pacific History,19(1),21-40.
25. Roman, J. Bedor(2015).Palau: From the Colonial Outpost to Independent Nation.Palau:Self-publishing.
26. Sai, David Keanu(2011).Ua Mau Ke Ea, Sovereignty Endures: An Overview of the Political and Legal History of the Hawaiian Islands.Honolulu:Pua'a Foundation.
27. Sai, David Keanu(2008).University Of Hawaii.
28. Schmitt, Robert C.(2000).The Cemetery for Foreigners.Hawaiian Journal of History,34,63-67.
29. Silva, Noenoe K.(2004).Aloha Betrayed: Native Hawaiian Resistance to American Colonialism.Durham, N.C.:Duke University Press.
30. Trask, Haunani-Kay(2000).The Struggle for Hawaiian Sovereignty: Introduction.Cultural Survival Quarterly,24(1)
31. Van Dyke, Jon M.(1998).The Political Status of the Native Hawaiian People.Yale Law and Policy Review,17(1),95-147.
32. Williams, Julie Stewart(1997).From the Mountains to the Sea: Early Hawaiian Life.Honolulu:Kamehameha Schools Press.
33. 官大偉(2008)。夏威夷大學Kamakaūokalani─夏威夷研究中心的課程。原教界，20，42-49。
34. 林淑雅(2007)。台北，國立台灣大學法律學研究所。
35. 信夫清三郎編、天津社會科學院日本問題研究所譯(1980)。日本外交史。中國北京:商務印書館。
36. 施正鋒(2012)。原住民族主權與國家主權。台灣原住民研究論叢，12，1-56。
37. 馬騰嶽(2011)。新竹，國立清華大學。
38. 郭佩宜(2016)。太平洋歷史研究學會。原教界，71，54-57。
39. 蔡志偉、杜芸樸(2016)。太平洋共同體秘書處。原教界，71，50-53。