题名

從新制度主義看墨西哥憲政體制對其政黨政治的影響

并列篇名

Analyzing the Impact of Mexico's Constitutional System on its Party Politics from the Perspective of New Institutionalism

作者

蘇彥斌(Yen-Pin Su)

关键词

墨西哥 ; 憲政體制 ; 政黨政治 ; Mexico ; constitutional system ; party politics

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

14卷2期(2018 / 06 / 01)

页次

79 - 101

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文從新制度論的角度出發,分析墨西哥的憲政體制如何影響該國的政黨政治發展。具體而言,本文認為墨西哥憲政體制中的「總統集權」與「民選官員不得連選連任」兩大特徵,對於該國政黨體系結構的發展、立法過程以及府會關係,具有重要的影響力。在2000年政黨輪替之前,這兩個憲政特徵的加乘效果強化了由革命建制黨(PRI)所主導的黨國體制。然而,從2000年開始,這兩個憲政規定加劇了行政—立法衝突,對於政治代表的品質與政治課責造成若干負面影響。

英文摘要

This article uses a new institutionalist perspective to analyze how Mexico's constitutional system influences the country's party politics. Specifically, it argues that the centralization of power in the presidency and the prohibition of reelection of elected officials are two crucial features in Mexico's constitution that have important influences on party system development, the law-making process, and executive-legislative relations. Before the party turnover in 2000, these two constitutional features helped strengthen the party-state of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). However, since 2000 the two constitutional features have worsened executive-legislative relations under divided government, which in turn has reduced the quality of political representation and political accountability.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 施正鋒(2015)。台灣民族主義的發展、現況、以及挑戰。台灣國際研究季刊,11(4),1-32。
    連結:
  2. Aguilar Méndez, Sergio,Lugo, José Luis Benitéz,Macklen, Rolando Tafolla(2006).Problemas Sociales, Económicos y Políticos de México.Mexico, D.F.:Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
  3. Aguilar, Karina. 2016. “Los Vetos De Los Presidentes.” 24 Horas (http://www.24-horas.mx/los-vetos-de-los-presidentes/) (2017/10/15).
  4. Álvarez, Jorge Arturo(2013).Why Has the Transition to Democracy Led the Mexican Presidential System to Political Instability? A Proposal to Enhance Institutional Arrangements.Mexican Law Review,5(2),277-304.
  5. Camp, Roderic A.(1990).Camarillas in Mexican Politics: The Case of the Salinas Cabinet.Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos,6(1),85-107.
  6. Carpizo, Jorge(1977).El Presidencialismo En México.México, D.F.:Siglo XXI.
  7. Centeno, Miguel Angel(1999).Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico.University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  8. Centro de Estudios Sociales y de Opinión Pública. 2006. “Temas De Política Interior.” (http://archivos.diputados.gob.mx/Centros_Estudio/Cesop/Comisiones/4_pinterior.htm) (2017/10/05).
  9. Cesar, Ma. Amparo(1999).Las Relaciones Entre El Poder Ejecutivo Y El Legislativo: El Caso De México.Política y Gobierno,6(1),83-128.
  10. Chand, Virkham K.(2001).Mexico's Political Awakening.Notre Dame:University Press of Notre Dame.
  11. Collier, Ruth B.,Collier, David(1991).Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  12. Colomer, Josep M.(2001).Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Cornelius, Wayne A.(ed.),Gentleman, Judith(ed.),Smith, Peter H.(ed.)(1989).Mexico's Alternative Political Futures.La Jolla:Center for U.S.- Mexican Studies.
  14. Cornelius, Wayne,Craig, Ann(1991).The Mexican Political System in Transition: The End of an Era.La Iolla:Center for U.S.-Mexican Relations, University of California.
  15. Cosio Villegas, Daniel(1975).La Sucesión Presidencial.México, D.F.:Editorial Joaquin Mortiz.
  16. de la Garza, Jose Maria Serna(2013).The Constitution of Mexico: A Contextual Analysis.Oxford:Hart Publishing.
  17. Domínguez, Jorge I.(ed.)(1999).Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion.London:Routledge.
  18. Edmonds-Poli, Emily,Shirk, David A.(2009).Comtemporary Mexican Politics.Lanham, Md.:Rowman & Littlefield.
  19. Eisenstadt, Todd A.(2004).Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  20. Elazar, Daniel J.(ed.)(1990).Constitutionalism: The Israeli and American Experiences.Lanham, Md.:University Press of America.
  21. Friedman, Edward(ed.),Wong, Joseph(ed.)(2008).Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose.New York:Routledge.
  22. Gamboa, Claudia, and Sandra Valdés. 2011. “Análisis De La Figura Del Veto.” Subdirección de Análisis de Política Interior, Cámara de Diputados LXI Legislatura (http://www.diputados.gob.mx/sedia/sia/spi/SAPI-ISS-14-11.pdf) (2017/10/12).
  23. González Campean, Miguel(ed.),Lomelí, Leonardo(ed.)(2000).El Partido De La Revolución: Institución Y Conflicto (1928-1999).Mexico, D.F.:Fondo de Cultura Economica.
  24. Grayson, George W.(1988).Mexico: From Corporatism to Pluralism?.Fort Worth, Tex.:Harcourt Brace & Co.
  25. Huntington, Samuel P.(1991).The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
  26. Johnson, Kenneth F.(1984).Mexican Democracy: A Critical View.New York:Praeger.
  27. Krasner, Stephen(1984).Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.Comparative Politics,16(2),223-46.
  28. Laakso, Markku,Taagepera, Rein(1979).Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.Comparative Political Studies,12(1),3-27.
  29. Lehoucq, Fabrice(2007).¿Qué Es El Fraude Electoral? Su Naturaleza, Sus Causas Y Consecuencias.Revista Mexicana de Sociología,69(1),1-38.
  30. Mainwaring, Scott(1993).Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.Comparative Political Studies,26(2),198-228.
  31. Mainwaring, Scott(ed.),Scully, Timothy R.(ed.)(2003).Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflict.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  32. Mainwaring, Scott(ed.),Shugart, Matthew S.(ed.)(1997).Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  33. Martínez, Jan. 2014. “La Casa De La Esposa De Peña Nieto Desata Una Polémica En México.” El País (https://elpais.com/internacional/2014/11/10/actualidad/1415637362_407817.html) (2017/10/06).
  34. Morgenstern, Scott(ed.)(2002).Legislative Politics in Latin America.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  35. Nacif, Benito(2004).Las Relaciones Entre Los Poderes Ejecutivo Y Legislativo Tras El Fin Del Presidencialismo En México.Política y Gobierno,11(1),9-41.
  36. North, Douglass C.(1990).Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  37. Peters, B. Guy(2012).Institutional Theory in Political Science.New York:Continuum.
  38. Peters, B. Guy,Pierre, Jon,King, Desmond S.(2005).The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.Journal of Politics,67(4),1275-1300.
  39. Pierson, Paul(2004).Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  40. Presidencia de la República. 2017. “Quinto Informe De Gobierno.” (http://framework-gb.cdn.gob.mx/quintoinforme/5IG_ANEXO_FINAL_TGM_250818.pdf) (2017/10/05).
  41. Rhodes, R. A. W.(ed.),Binder, Sarah A.(ed.),Rockman, Bert A.(ed.)(2006).The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  42. Sartori, Giovanni(1976).Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  43. Schatz, Sara(2000).Elites, Masses, and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: A Culturalist Approach.Westport, Conn.:Praeger.
  44. Shepsle, Kenneth A.(1989).Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.Journal of Theoretical Politics,1(2),131-47.
  45. Smith, Martin J.(2009).Power and the State.London:Palgrave MacMillan.
  46. Spoon, Jae-Jae,Gómez, Amalia Pulido(2017).Unusual Bedfellows? Pri-Pvem Electoral Alliances in Mexican Legislative Elections.Journal of Politics in Latin America,9(2),63-92.
  47. Starr, Pamela K.(2014).Mexico's Problematic Reforms.Current History,113(760),51-56.
  48. Stein, Ernesto(ed.),Tommasi, Mariano(ed.)(2008).Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies.New York:Inter-American Development Bank.
  49. Steinmo, Sven(ed.),Thelen, Kathleen A.(ed.),Longstreth, Frank(ed.)(1992).Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  50. Steinmo, Sven(ed.),Thelen, Kathleen(ed.),Longstreth, Frank(ed.)(1992).Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  51. Trevizo, Dolores(2011).Rural Protest and the Making of Democracy in Mexico, 1968-2000.University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  52. Valverde, Miguel A.(2016).The Craftsmanship of Politics: Negotiating the 2014 Political-Electoral Reform in Mexico.Journal of Public Governance and Policy: Latin American Review,1(3),135-56.
  53. Wood, Duncan(2012).Mexico's Democratic Challenges.Washington Quarterly,35(4),93-104.
  54. Wuhs, Steven T.(2008).Savage Democracy: Institutional Change and Party Development in Mexico.University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  55. Zhong, Nan. 2015. “Rail Firm to Get $1.31m Compensation from Mexico.” China Daily (http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2015- 05/23/content_20798096.htm)(2016/10/6).
  56. 施正鋒,2017。〈公務人員的罷工權〉《民報》(http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/f69d4344-6ec9-4cfa-be45-e1c4fbef9580)(2018/3/3)。
  57. 施正鋒(2010)。十年來半總統制在台灣的運作。半總統制與民主學術研討會,台北:
  58. 蘇彥斌(2005)。墨西哥的社會運動與民主化。台北:台灣國際研究學會。