『跨大西洋貿易及投資夥伴協議』之回顧與展望

Review and Prospect on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

紀舜傑(Shun-jie Ji)

『跨大西洋貿易及投資夥伴協議』 ； 自由貿易 ； 英國脫歐 ； 多層次因果分析法 ； Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ； free trade ； Brexit ； Causal Layered Analysis

台灣國際研究季刊

17卷2期（2021 / 07 / 01）

29 - 46

繁體中文

美國與歐盟的『跨大西洋貿易及投資夥伴協議』是在2013年宣布開展，是世界上兩個最大的經濟體的自由貿易談判，當時總共製造了全世界40%的GDP，貿易量佔全球1/3，將會是全世界最大的貿易協定。此貿易協定在當時的確讓世人眼界大開，也高度好奇這個涵蓋8億消費者，以及協調歐盟和北美從食品安全領域、環境保護、到銀行金融領域的協定，結果將會是如何。本文的目的在理解這個人類歷史上最大量的自由貿易協定，探索從其產生的背景因素，到談判的困難，終至停止的發展歷程，最後以未來學的「多層次因果分析法」進行自由貿易之深層剖析，並探討其可能之未來發展。本文發現，雙方從一開始就知道戰略意義大於經濟效益，不只是兩造的經濟規模的龐大，更重要的是它的屬性是要一個全面性的大規模的管理協定，加上非關稅障礙的問題複雜，難度是史無前例的高。此外，該協議更有重要的戰略意義，著眼點在於鞏固美歐的戰略同盟、維護美歐在全球經貿規範中的話語權，並且降低歐洲對俄羅斯能源的依賴等。目前是終止狀態，但是仍保有重新開啟的可能性。

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) of the United States and the European Union was initiated and launched in 2013. This agreement was targeted at the two biggest economy units of the world and would be the biggest trade agreement of the world. It certainly caught global enormous attention, in which curiosity and expectation mixed by different observers' interests. The main purpose of this paper is to review the development of TTIP and examine the difficulties behind this complicated negotiation which covered issues from environmental, cybersecurity, privacy, and even cultural differences. The finding and conclusion suggest that TTIP was more than trade and economic purposes from the beginning. Especially the geopolitical strategy consideration prevailed over the original trade objectives. Although it seems idle now, its reopening still remains as the possible future.

1. (2015).The TTIP of the Spear.Economist,October 17
2. BBC. 2016. “Protests in Germany against Transatlantic TTIP and Ceta Trade Deals.” September 17 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37396796) (2021/2/22)
3. Dator, James(ed.),Bezold, Clement(ed.)(1981).Judging the Future.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
4. De Ville, Ferdi,Siles-Brugge, Garvriel(2017).Why TTIP is a Game-changer and Its Critics Have a Point.Journal of European Public Policy,24(10),1491-1505.
5. Dür, Andreas,Schlipphak, Bernd(2021).Elite Cueing and Attitudes towards Trade Agreements: The Case of TTIP.European Political Science Review,13(1),41-57.
6. Erlanger, Steven. 2021. “Blinken’s Welcome by NATO Doesn’t Hide Differences on Key Issues.” New York Times, March 24 (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/24/world/europe/Blinken-Biden-NATO-Europe.html) (2021/4/24)
7. Foucault, Michael(1973).The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.New York:Vintage Books.
8. Freytag Andreas,Draper, Peter,Fricke, Susanne(2014).The Impact of TTIP, Volume 2: Political Consequences for EU Economic Policymaking, Transatlantic Integration, China and the World Trade Order.
9. Galtung, Johan(1996).Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization.London:Sage Publishing.
10. Ikenson, Daniel J. 2016. “RIP TTIP?” (https://www.cato.org/blog/rip-ttip) (2021/4/24)
11. Ikenson, Daniel J.(2013).The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: A Roadmap for Success.Free Trade Bulletin,55
12. Inayatullah, Sohail(2004).The Causal Layered Analysis Reader.Taipei:Tamkang University Press.
13. Kelpie, Colm. 2016. “Public Wants Referendum on TTIP: Poll.” Independent.ie, July 25 (https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/public-wants-referendum-on-ttip-poll-34908749.html) (2021/4/24)
14. MacAskill, Ewen, Nick Davies, Nick Hopkins, Julian Borger, and James Ball. 2013. “GCHQ Intercepted Foreign Politicians’ Communications at G20 Summits.” Guardian, June 16 (https://web.archive.org/web/20130617155557/http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/16/gchq-intercepted-communications-g20-summits) (2021/4/24)
15. Malmström, Cecilia. 2015. “TTIP on Track.” (http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/march/tradoc_153214.pdf) (2021/4/24)
16. Mansfield, Edward D.,Mutz, Dianna C.,Silver, Laura R.(2015).Men, Women, Trade, and Free Markets.International Studies Quarterly,59(2),303-315.
17. Martin, Lisa L.(ed.)(2015).The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Pelkmans, Jacques,Lejour, Arjan,Schrefler, Lorna,Mustilli, Federica,Timini, Jacopo(2014).Detailed Appraisal by the EP Ex-ante Impact Assessment Unit of the European Commission’s Impact Assessment EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.
19. Reuters. 2016. “Survey Shows Plunging Public Support for TTIP in U.S. and Germany.” April 21 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-usa-trade-idUSKCN0XI0AT) (2021/4/24)
20. Stokes, Bruce. 2015. “Americans’ Views on Trade, TTP and TTIP.” Pew Research Center (https://www.wita.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Bruce-Stokes-Politics-in-Trade-10.7.15.pdf) (2021/4/24)
21. Studdart, Amy(2014).Europe’s Trade Strategy at a TTIP-Ing Point.Global Economics Monthly,3(7)
22. Tatam, Robert. 2015. “Christians Must Protest against TTIP.” Church Times, October 2 (https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2015/2-october/comment/opinion/christians-must-protest-against-ttip) (2021/4/24)
23. 鍾志恆，2016。〈德法批TTIP談判失敗，罪在美國〉《工商時報》8月30日(https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160830000070-260203?chdtv) (2021/3/21)

1. 紀舜傑(2022)。美國印太經濟架構與跨太平洋夥伴全面進步協定。臺灣國際研究季刊，18(2)，143-162。