题名

大壩風潮下湄公河流域的水域治理難題:以越南為例

并列篇名

Difficulties in Water Governance in the Mekong River Basin under the Dam Surge: A Case Study of Vietnam

作者

李欣欣(Hsin-Hsin Lee)

关键词

湄公河 ; 大壩 ; 區域合作 ; 非傳統安全 ; 水域治理 ; Mekong River ; dam ; regional cooperation ; non-traditional security ; water governance

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

18卷3期(2022 / 09 / 01)

页次

141 - 165

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

二十多年來,湄公河中上游的水電大壩開發,形成一股大壩風潮,這明顯地改變了下游水文條件及特性。其可能引起的各種後果,除了包括傳統的軍事安全之外,另外也造成湄公河流域利害關係國的各種環境與經濟等非傳統安全上的疑慮。由於中上游大壩的快速發展,湄公河流域的國家就籠罩相似的社會、經濟、環境等等問題。特別是處於下游的國家,需要以區域合作的方式來加以應對。本文以湄公河下游的越南為例,討論越南目前面對的難題。因為水壩大都建造在上游的河流谷地,所以從上游以降皆造成各種不同影響。建造大壩代表著會有一定面積的土地被淹沒,並導致不少村莊的遷徙,以及居民的重新安置;同時也使得下游的國家對於河流資源的合理使用、水源的減少產生憂慮,內心縈繞著資源被剝奪的焦慮感。本文在各類研究報告及親身實地訪查湄公河的基礎上,發現越南面對的各項水域治理難題,主要有大壩建設後的水源減少、下游乾旱,泥沙減少造成的河岸侵蝕,地下水位降低引起的土壤鹽化。而越南所採取的對應策略則為善用運河灌溉系統、普及自來水、嚴管河沙開採與保留洪氾平原,法規中加入應對氣候變化和可持續發展的新目標,並利用區域組織、資訊平台、主動協調等,強化區域合作。

英文摘要

This article takes Vietnam in the lower Mekong River as an example to discuss the difficulties that Vietnam is currently facing. Because dams are mostly built in upstream river valleys, there are various impacts from upstream and downstream. The construction of the dam means that a certain area of land will be submerged, which will lead to the relocation of many villages and the resettlement of residents; at the same time, it also makes the downstream countries which are full of anxiety about being deprived of resources worry about the rational use of river resources and the reduction of water sources. Based on various research reports and field visits to the Mekong River, this article finds out that Vietnam faces various water governance difficulties, mainly including the reduction of water sources after the construction of the dam, the downstream drought, the erosion of riverbanks caused by the reduction of sediment, and the salinization of soil caused by the reduction of the groundwater level. The corresponding strategies adopted by Vietnam are to make good use of canal irrigation systems, popularize running water, strictly control river sand mining and preserve floodplains, add new goals to address climate change and sustainable development in regulations, and use regional organizations, information platforms, active coordination, etc., to strengthen regional cooperation.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王崑義(2010)。非傳統安全與台灣軍事戰略的變革。台灣國際研究季刊,6(3),1-43。
    連結:
  2. 王啟明(2018)。雙層國際社會化與中國環境政策存在的問題:以怒江反壩爭議為例。遠景基金會季刊,19(4),1-40。
    連結:
  3. 曾怡仁,吳政嶸(2009)。密特蘭尼的功能主義國際關係理論——一種比較的觀點。台灣國際研究季刊,5(4),143-167。
    連結:
  4. 維基百科,2020。〈越南地理區劃〉(https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/越南地理區劃)(2020/10/2)。
  5. 維基百科,2022。〈湄公河委員會〉(https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/湄公河委員會)(2022/3/20)。
  6. Beley, Alebel Abebe,Haq, Shah Md Atiqul,Chien, Vuong Quoc,Arafat, Badandi(2010).The Challenges of Integrated Management of Mekong River Basin in Terms of People’s Livelihood.Water Resource and Protection,2,61-68.
  7. Biggs, David(2012).Small Machines in the Garden: Everyday Technology and Revolution in the Mekong delta.Modern Asian Studies,46(1),47-70.
  8. Biggs, David(2008).Breaking from the Colonial Mold: Water Engineering and the Failure of Nation-Building in the Plain of Reeds, Vietnam.Technology and Culture,49(3),599-623.
  9. Brocheux, Pierre(1995).The Mekong Delta: Ecology, Economy, and Revolution, 1860-1960.Madison:Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  10. Jacobs, Jeffrey W.(2002).The Mekong River Commission: Transboundary Water Resources Planning and Regional Security.Geographical Journal,168(4),354-364.
  11. Jacobs, Jeffrey W.(1995).Mekong Committee History and Lessons for River Basin Development.Geographical Journal,161(2),135-148.
  12. Kirchherr, Julian,Charles, Katrina J.(2016).The Social Impacts of Dams: A New Framework for Scholarly Analysis.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,60,99-114.
  13. McHale, Shawn(2013).Ethnicity, Violence, and Khmer-Vietnamese Relations: The Significance of the Lower Mekong Delta, 1757-1954.Journal of Asian Studies,72(2),367-390.
  14. Mekong Dam Monitor. 2022. “Basin-Wide Dams and Connectivity.” (https://monitor.mekongwater.org/basin-wide-dams-and-connectivity/?v=1642195188734) (2022/3/20)
  15. Mekong River Commission(2017).Mekong Delta Water Resources Management ProjectMekong Delta Water Resources Management Project,Vientiane, Lao PDR:.
  16. Meyfroidt, Patrick,Lambin, Eric F.(2009).Forest Transition in Vietnam and Displacement of Deforestation Abroad.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,106(38),16139-16144.
  17. Molle, Francois,Chu, Thai Hoanh(2009).Work IWMI Research ReportWork IWMI Research Report,未出版
  18. Nguyen, Nghia Hung,Delgado, José Miguel,Vo, Khac Tri,Le, Manh Hung,Merz, Bruno,Bárdossy, András,Apel, Heiko(2012).Floodplain Hydrology of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.Hydrological Processes,26(5),674-686.
  19. Nguyen, Van Manh,Nguyen, Viet Dung,Nguyen, Nghia Hung,Matti, Kummu,Bruno, Merz,Heiko, Apel(2015).Future Sediment Dynamics in the Mekong Delta Floodplains: Impacts of Hydropower Development, Climate Change and Sea Level Rise.Global and Planetary Change,127,22-33.
  20. Pearse-Smith, Scott W. D.(2012).The Impact of Continued Mekong Basin Hydropower Development on Local Livelihoods.Consilience: Journal of Sustainable Development,7(1),73-86.
  21. Radio Free Asia. 2012. “Lao Expert Blames Chinese Dams.” (https://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/mekong-03302012201901.html) (2020/1/15)
  22. Sneddon, Chris,Fox, Coleen(2006).Rethinking Transboundary Waters: A Critical Hydropolitics of the Mekong basin.Political Geography,25,181-202.
  23. Socialist Republic of Vietnam(2005).National Report On Disaster Reduction In Vietnam.World Conference on Disaster Reduction,Kobe-Hyogo, Japan:
  24. Socialist Republic Of Vietnam. 2017. Nghị quyết số 120/NQ-CP (https://datafiles.chinhphu.vn/cpp/files/vbpq/2017/12/120.signed.pdf) (2022/3/15)
  25. Tilt, Bryan,Gerkey, Drew(2016).Dams and Population Displacement on China’s Upper Mekong River: Implications for Social Capital and Social–Ecological Resilience.Global Environmental Change,36,153-162.
  26. Tran, Dung Duc,Weger, Jacob(2017).Barriers to Implementing Irrigation and Drainage Policies in an Giang Province, Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Irrigation and Drainage Strategy in the Vietnamese Mekong Floodplain.Irrigation and Drainage,67,81-95.
  27. United Nations in Viet Nam(2014).Migration, Resettlement and Climate Change in Viet Nam: Reducing Exposure and Vulnerabilities to Climatic Extremes and Stresses Through Spontaneous and Guided Migration.Hanoi:Phu Sy Printing Co.
  28. van der Geest, Kees,Nguyen, Viet Khoa,Nguyen, Cong Thao(2014).Internal Migration in the Upper Mekong Delta, Viet Nam: What Is the Role of Climate-Related Stressors?.Asia-Pacific Population Journal,29(2),25-42.
  29. Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio,Avagyan, Mikayel,Firlus, Marit,Helbing, Georg,Kabakova, Margarita(2016).Hydropower vs. Fisheries Conservation a Test of Institutional Design Principles for Common-Pool Resource Management in the Lower Mekong Basin Social-Ecological System.Ecology and Society,21(1),234-252.
  30. Wang, Pu,Lassoie, James P.,Dong, Shikui,Morreale, Stephen J.(2013).A Framework for Social Impact Analysis of Large Dams: A Case Study of Cascading Dams on the Upper-Mekong River, China.Journal of Environmental Management,117,131-140.
  31. Watcharejyothin, Mayurachat,Shrestha, Ram(2009).Regional Energy Resource Development and Energy Security under CO2 Emission Constraint in the Greater Mekong sub-region.Energy Policy,37,4428-4441.
  32. Watcharejyothin, Mayurachat,Shrestha, Ram(2009).Effects of Cross-border Power Trade between Laos and Thailand: Energy Security and Environmental Implications.Energy Policy,37,1782-1792.
  33. Werthmann, Christine(2010).Water Management in Seasonal Floodplains of the Mekong Delta: A Case Study from Four Villages in Cambodia and Vietnam.Consilience,3,139-158.
  34. 三立新聞台,2018。〈東南亞糧倉「湄公河」養活 6 千萬人漸成過去式中國蓋水壩「重創生態」居民成經濟孤兒〉10月2日(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19FRZsPDIEQ)(2020/I0/8)。
  35. 今天頭條,2016。〈中國同意開閘放水救越南一命越網民沸騰了〉3月20日(https://www.twgreatdaily.com/cat44/node969856)(2020/3/30)
  36. 王小民(2001)。湄公河水電開發對環境的影響。東南亞研究,3,10-14。
  37. 百度百科,2015。〈非傳統安全〉《百度百科》8月8日(https://baike.baidu.com/item/非傳統安全)(2019/3/25)。
  38. 李文堂(2015)。台中,東海大學政治學系。
  39. 李欣欣(2014)。埔里,暨南國際大學東南亞研究所。
  40. 李慶新(2010)。鄚玖與河仙政權(港口國)。南方華裔研究雜志,4,176-188。
  41. 昔日太陽電子報,2016。〈泰抽湄公河水治旱〉《昔日太陽電子報》3月19日(http://the-sun.on.cc/cnt/china_world/20160319/00423_001.html)(2020/10/21)。
  42. 財團法人中技社(2013).非傳統安全議題對我國之衝擊評估與因應.台北:財團法人中技社.
  43. 陳麗暉,何大明(2000)。瀾滄江——湄公河水電梯級開發的生態影響。地理學報,55(5),577-586。
  44. 蒂莫.拉薩寧,2017。〈研究稱水電開發改變湄公河水文〉《中外對話》2月13日(https://chinadialogue.net/zh/4/43505/)(2021/3/27)。
  45. 羅金義,秦偉燊(2017).老撾的地緣政治學——扈從還是避險?.香港:香港城市大學出版社.