题名

東協中心性與避險策略之研究：以加入『區域全面經濟夥伴協定』與『跨太平洋夥伴全面進步協定』經濟倡議為例

并列篇名

ASEAN Centrality and Hedging Strategy: Cases of RCEP and CPTPP

作者

鄧育承(Yu-Cheng Teng)

关键词

東協中心性 ； 避險 ； 區域全面經濟貿易夥伴協定 ； 跨太平洋夥伴全面進步協定 ； ASEAN Centrality ； hedging ； Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ； Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

18卷3期（2022 / 09 / 01）

页次

83 - 101

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

自冷戰以來，東南亞國家協會成員國因懼怕共產勢力在東南亞蔓延，而進行戰略上的團結，維護區域和平。冷戰結束後，該組織透過「多邊談判」以及「區域經濟整合」等方式進行貿易自由化，並逐步消除區域內之關稅。值得注意的是東協十個成員國的經濟發展、社會文化、政治制度與宗教信仰迥然有異，卻能夠透過「尋求共識」、「共同協商」、「不干預內政」及「相互包容」原則推行「東協模式」，為「東協經濟共同體」奠定良好基礎，促進區域一體化。然而，21世紀所建構的「東協中心性」，透過現有的五個東協加一，計有中國、日本、韓國、紐西蘭、澳洲與印度的自由貿易協定，印度因中國對其貿易順差過大而退出，擴大區域化整合形成『區域全面經濟貿易夥伴協定』發揮綜效。本文主張東協應支持RCEP與『跨太平洋夥伴全面進步協定』鞏固「東協中心性」，平衡大國權力，避免受其牽制。
英文摘要

Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations have been strategically uniting to maintain regional peace out of fear of the spread of communism in Southeast Asia ever since the Cold War. Followed by the Cold War, the organization underwent trade liberalization through multilateral negotiations and regional economic integration, and gradually eliminated tariffs in the region. It is worth noting that the despite the ten members of ASEAN having different economic development, societal cultures, political systems, and religious beliefs, they could construct ASEAN Way through consensus, consultation, non-interference, and mutual respect. These paved the way for the ASEAN Economic Community, facilitating regional integration. However, ASEAN Centrality was catalyzed in the 21^(st) century through the framework of 'ASEAN Plus One', including Free Trade Agreements with China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Australia, and India, with the latter being in a status of trade surplus to withdraw. The respective FTAs that emerged gradually led to the formation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This article proposes that ASEAN should engage in the RCEP and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) to consolidate ASEAN Centrality. By doing so, a hedging strategy can counter balance the influence of great powers and avoid interdependence.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 吳玲君(2007)。東協國家與東亞經濟合作：從「東協加三」到「東亞高峰會」。問題與研究，46(2)，117-119。
    連結：
  2. 吳祖田(1998)。「東南亞國家協會」組織之發展與回顧。問題與研究，37(8)，35-48。
    連結：
  3. 吳崇涵(2018)。中美競逐影響力下的臺灣避險策略。歐美研究，48(4)，513-547。
    連結：
  4. 李瓊莉(2015)。亞太區域經濟構築中的「東協中心性」。遠景基金會季刊，16(4)，71-113。
    連結：
  5. 蔡明彥,張凱銘(2015)。「避險」戰略下大國互動模式之研究：以美中亞太戰略競合為例。遠景基金會季刊，16(3)，1-68。
    連結：
  6. (2008).ASEAN Charter.
  7. Bhagwati, Jagdish,Greenaway, David,Panagariya, Arvind(1998).Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy.Economic Journal,108(449),1128-1148.
  8. Caballero-Anthony, Mely(2014).Understanding ASEAN’s Centrality: Bases and Prospects in an Evolving Regional Architecture.Pacific Review,27(4),563-584.
  9. Cho, Hyun, Il,Park, Seo-Hyun(2013).The Rise of China and Varying Sentiments in Southeast Asia toward Great Powers.Strategic Studies Quarterly,7(2),69-92.
  10. Dalpino, Catharin(2009).Southeast Asia in 2008: Challenges and Without.Southeast Asian Affairs,3-16.
  11. Drysdale, Peter(1991).Open Regionalism: A Key to East Asia’s Economic Future.Canberra:Australia-Japan Research Centre.
  12. Dymond, Tony, Cameron Sim, and Tiffany Chan. 2022. “Dispute Settlement Mechanisms under the CPTPP and the RCEP.” Global Arbitration Review(https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-asia-pacific-arbitration-review/2023/article/dispute-settlement-mechanisms-under-the-cptpp-and-the-rcep) (2022/7/17)
  13. Goh, Evelyn(2005).Policy Studies 16–Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies.Washington, D.C.:East-West Center.
  14. Hack, Karl(2011).Negotiating with the Malayan Communist Party, 1948-89.Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History,39(4),607-632.
  15. Hansson, Eva,Hewis, Kevin,Glassman, Jim(2020).Legacies of the Cold War in East and Southeast Asia: An Introduction.Journal of Contemporary Asia,50(4),493-510.
  16. Kuik, Cheng-Chwee(2008).The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China.Contemporary Southeast Asia,30(2),159-185.
  17. Lim, Darren J.,Cooper, Zack(2015).Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia.Security Studies,24(4),696-727.
  18. Mahbubani, Kishore,Sng, Jeffery,翟崑（譯）,麗娜（譯）(2017).解讀東協：前進東協,你不可不知道的經濟、政治、歷史背景,以及現況與未來.台北:遠流.
  19. Mueller, Maximilian Muelle(2019).ASEAN Centrality under Threat: The Case of RCEP and Connectivity.Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies,8(2),177-198.
  20. Mueller, Maximilian Muelle(2019).Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and Hedging in Connectivity Governance.Pacific Review,34(5),747-777.
  21. Narine, Shaun(2002).Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia.Boulder, Colo.:Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  22. Nishimura, Hidetoshi,Ambashi, Masahito,Iwassaki, Fusanori(2019).Strengthened ASEAN Centrality and East Asia Collective Leadership: Role of Japan-ASEAN Cooperation as Development of Heart to Heart Diplomacy.Collective Leadership, ASEAN Centrality, and Strengthening the ASEAN Institutional Ecosystem
  23. Roosa, John(2006).Pretext for Mass Murder: The September 30th Movement and Suharto’s Coup d'Etat in Indonesia.Madison, Wis.:University of Wisconsin Press.
  24. Shambaugh, David,黃中憲(2021).中美爭霸：兩強相遇東南亞.台北:春山出版有限公司.
  25. Stubbs, Richard(2014).ASEAN’s Leadership in East Asian Region-building: Strength in Weakness.Pacific Review,27(4),523-538.
  26. Taylor, Keith(2019).Southeast Asia’s Cold War: An Interpretive History.Journal of Cold War Studies,21(1),195-196.
  27. US-ASEAN. 2021. “About CPTPP and RCEP.” April 6 (https://www.usasean.org/regions/tpp/about) (2022/6/28)
  28. Walt, Steven(1987).The Origins of Alliances.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  29. Weitsman, Patricia A.(2004).Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War.Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press.
  30. 宋鎮照(1997)。東南亞金融風暴之政治經濟意涵。海峽評論，82
  31. 李志強(2018)。11 國簽署 CPTPP 與美「中」貿易摩擦。展望與探南，16(4)，21-26。
  32. 林若雩(2016)。「東協共同體內外安全治理之困境——新區域主義的觀點。淡江國際與區域研究，5(1)，1-43。
  33. 郝培芝,羅至美(2007)。國際整合與區域主義。國際關係總論，台北:
print cancel