题名

柬埔寨的國家認同─榮耀與傷痛的連動

并列篇名

National Identity of Cambodia: Interaction between Glory and Grief

作者

紀舜傑(Shun-jie Ji)

关键词

吳哥文明 ; 赤柬 ; 佛教民族主義 ; Angkor Civilization ; Khmer Rouge ; Buddhism Nationalism

期刊名称

台灣國際研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

19卷2期(2023 / 07 / 01)

页次

43 - 62

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

柬埔寨的國家形象經常吳哥文明的榮耀,與赤柬恐怖統治的對比。本文以原生論與建構論之脈絡檢驗柬埔寨國家認同之要素與議題。我們發現柬埔寨的國家認同涉及了歷史、文化、社會和政治等多個領域,反映了長期與周邊社會交流和互動的歷史結果,特別是印度和東南亞其他國家文化對柬埔寨語言、宗教、藝術和建築等的影響,以及法國殖民主義和之後赤柬政權對柬埔寨身份認同都有深遠的影響。赤柬的恐怖統治摧毀所有文化傳承的媒介與機制,讓進入全球化時代的柬埔寨重新建構國家認同的要素。專制政權與貪汙腐敗仍是嚴峻的挑戰。

英文摘要

On the common images of Cambodia, it is seen of the splendid architecture of Angkor Wat contrarily with the brutal ruling of Khmer Rouge. These two strongest images have dominated the formation of Cambodian national identity since the French colonization to the globalization eras. The glorious historical elements gave Cambodians a source of nationalism to cope with French ruling and the Cold War politics. Just like Thailand and Burma, Buddhism also plays a big role in Cambodian nationalism. Although there is no obvious conflicts among religions, however, the sole and noble position of Buddhism still enact as a potential threat to common identity. The future challenges of Cambodia lie on the path of democratic reforms, in which decentralization of power and elimination of severe corruption are the keys to new Cambodia.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 紀舜傑(2021)。泰國的國家認同。台灣國際研究季刊,17(4),47-66。
    連結:
  2. 紀舜傑(2022)。緬甸的國家認同。台灣國際研究季刊,18(4),1-19。
    連結:
  3. 維基百科, 2023b。〈 柬埔寨國旗 〉( https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/柬埔寨國旗 )(2023/4/22)。
  4. 維基百科,2023b。〈真臘風土記〉(https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/周达观)(2023/4/22)。
  5. Anderson, Benedict(1983).The Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.London:Verso.
  6. Brinkley, Joel(2012).Cambodia’s Curse: The Modern History of a Troubled Land.New York:PublicAffairs.
  7. Brinkley, Joel,楊芩雯(譯)(2014).柬埔寨:被詛咒的國度.台北:聯經.
  8. Chandler, David(1999).Brother Number One: A Political Biography of Pol Pot.London:Routledge.
  9. Chandler, David(2007).A History of Cambodia.London:Routledge.
  10. Clymer, Kenton(2004).The United States and Cambodia, 1969-2000: A Troubled Relationship.London:Routledge.
  11. Downie, Sue,Kingsbury, Damien(2001).Political Development and the Re-emergence of Civil Society in Cambodia.Contemporary Southeast Asia,23(1),43-64.
  12. Ear, Sophal(2013).Aid Dependence in Cambodia: How Foreign Assistance Undermines Democracy.New York:Columbia University Press.
  13. Ebrahim, Shireen(2015).Political Psychology, Identity Politics, and Social Reconciliation in Post-Genocidal Cambodia.Global Societies Journal,3,60-68.
  14. Hinton, Alexander L.(1998).Why Did You Kill?: The Cambodian Genocide and the Dark Side of Face and Honor.Journal of Asian Studies,57(1),93-122.
  15. Kopsa, Andy. 2019. “How Cambodia’s Day of Remembrance for Genocide Victims Has Always Been Complicated by Politics.” Time, May 20 (https://time.com/5591061/cambodia-remembrance-day-history/) (2023/5/1)
  16. Kozymka, Irena(2014).The Diplomacy of Culture: The Role of UNESCO in Sustaining Cultural Diversity.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Linton, Suzannah(2004).Reconciliation in Cambodia.Phnom Penh:Documentation Center of Cambodia.
  18. Long, Colin,Reeves, Keir(2008).Dig a Hole and Bury the Past in It: Reconciliation and the Heritage of Genocide in Cambodia.Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with “Difficult Heritage”,New York:
  19. Mertha, Andrew(2014).Brothers in Arms: Chinese Aid to the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  20. Mydans, Seth. 2022. “In Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge Trials Come to an End.” New York Times, September 22 (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/22/world/asia/cambodia-khmer-rouge-tribunal.html) (2023/5/2)
  21. Randall, Groves, J.(2014).Southeast Asian Identities: The Case of Cambodia.Comparative Civilizations Review,70(70),9-25.
  22. Shawcross, William(2002).Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon, and the Destruction of Cambodia.New York:Cooper Square Press.
  23. Smith, Anthony D.(1991).National Identity.Reno, Nev.:University of Nevada Press.
  24. Taylor, Adam. 2014. “Why the World should not Forget Khmer Rouge and the Killing Fields of Cambodia.” Washington Post, August 7 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/08/07/why-the-world-should-not-forget-khmer-rouge-and-the-killing-fields-of-cambodia/) (2023/4/22)
  25. UNESCO(1992).Nominations of Cultural and Natural Properties to the World Heritage List and List of World Heritage in Danger.World Heritage Committee, 16th session
  26. United Nations. 2022. “Cambodia: UN-Backed Tribunal Ends with Conviction Upheld for Last Living Khmer Rouge Leader.” UN News, September 11 (https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1127521) (2023/4/22)
  27. WIPO. n.d. “The Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia.” (https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/zh/text/491134) (2023/5/1)
  28. 中華民國外交部,2023。〈柬埔寨王國〉(https://www.mofa.gov.tw/CountryInfo.aspx?CASN=5&n=5&sms=33&s=198)(2023/4/22)。
  29. 東華日報,2019。〈洪森:柬埔寨從未發生過宗教衝突〉(https://jianhuadaily.com/20190507/52296)(2023/5/01)。
  30. 林仕祥,2022。〈「台版柬埔寨」驚全國、台灣為何成詐騙天堂?〉《遠見雜誌》(https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/96287)(2023/4/12)。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。寮國的國家認同──殖民與戰爭後的重建。臺灣國際研究季刊,20(1),71-89。