論蔣景祁《瑤華集》之編纂要義及輯校價值－以卷二十二為考察範圍

The Editing Essentials and Collating Values of ＂Yaohua Ji＂ of Jiang, Jing-qi-Vol.22 as the Scope of Study

許淑惠(Hsu, Shu-Hui)

蔣景祁 ； 《瑤華集》 ； 《全清詞．順康卷》（含補編） ； 清詞選 ； Jiang, Jing-qi ； ＂Yaohua Ji＂ ； ＂Quan Qing Ci. Shunkang Juan＂ (including the supplement) ； Ci collections of the Qing dynasty

高雄師大國文學報

34期（2021 / 10 / 01）

115 - 152

繁體中文

清初陽羨後學蔣景祁選錄《瑤華集》，擇明末清初詞人507家，詞作2467首，堪稱繼《倚聲初集》、《東白堂詞選初集》後，最大型之詞選本，諸多詞作賴此以存，深具文獻價值，本文先探討其編纂要義；且前賢編輯《全清詞．順康卷》時多方參酌各類詞選集，厥功甚偉，《瑤華集》亦在查考之列，然其工程龐大繁瑣，資料更是浩如煙海，不得不匯集眾人之力，失收、錯謬在所難免，故本文擬就現今可見之《瑤華集》康熙天藜閣原刻二十二卷本，與《全清詞．順康卷》二十冊（含補輯四冊）所錄相對照，礙於篇幅所限，筆者僅先聚焦於《瑤華集》卷二十二為考察範圍，逐一與《全清詞．順康卷》比對後，補輯失收詞及區辨詞句異文，藉此更可言而有據地彰顯蔣景祁《瑤華集》於詞學研究里程上的特殊意義及價值。

Jiang, Jing-qi, a follower of the Yang Xian school, edited the ＂Yaohua Ji＂ in the early-Qing dynasty. He selected 2467 pieces of Ci which were written by 507 Poets. ＂Yaohua Ji＂ was the largest Ci selection after the ＂Yisheng Chuji＂ and ＂Dongbaitang Cixuan Chuji＂. A lot of the Ci could be preserved because of it. It is high in philological value. The editing essentials of the ＂Yaohua Ji＂ will be discussed in the first part of this article. The second part is the comparison between the ＂Yaohua Ji＂ (Vol.22 of Kangxi Tianlüge Yuanke) and the ＂Quan Qing Ci. Shunkang Juan＂ (vol.20, including 4 volumes of the supplement). While editing ＂Quan Qing Ci. Shunkang Juan＂, the predecessors revised the different kinds of Ci collections and did a great job. Since the editing work was heavily loaded and cumbersome, it needed the efforts of several editors. Therefore, omissions and errors were unvoidable. Due to the length limitation, the scope of study was restricted to Vol.22 of the ＂Yaohua Ji＂. The selected Ci of the ＂Yaohua Ji＂ (vol.22) and the ＂Quan Qing Ci. Shunkang Juan＂ would be examined thoroughly. Those omitted by the ＂Quan Qing Ci. Shunkang Juan＂ would be supplemented. Different wordings of same Ci in these two collections would be pointed out. The significances and values of the ＂Yaohua Ji＂ in the research mileage of Ci arena could be highlighted solidly.

1. （元）黃鎮成（編）(2009).秋聲集.合肥:黃山書社.
2. （宋）李昉(2009).太平御覽.合肥:黃山書社.
3. （宋）洪興祖（補注）(2009).楚辭補注.北京:中華書局.
4. （宋）陳師道(2008).宋金元詞話全編.南京:鳳凰出版社.
5. （明）張溥（輯）(1968).漢魏六朝一百三家集.臺北:新興書局.
6. （清）丁紹儀(2005).聽秋聲館詞話.北京:中華書局.
7. （清）王奕清（纂）(2008).欽定詞譜.北京:學苑出版社.
8. （清）王昶(2005).國朝詞綜.北京:商務印書館.
9. （清）田同之(2005).西圃詞說.北京:中華書局.
10. （清）朱孝臧（輯校）(1989).彊村叢書.上海:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社.
11. （清）朱彝尊（編）,（清）汪森（編）(2008).詞綜.上海:上海古籍出版社.
12. （清）吳之振（編）(1986).宋詩鈔.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
13. （清）吳修（編）(1967).昭代名人尺牘小傳.臺中:立德出版社.
14. （清）吳綺(1997).選聲集.臺南:莊嚴文化事業有限公司.
15. （清）沈雄(2005).古今詞話.北京:中華書局.
16. （清）曹寅（編）(2009).全唐詩.北京:中華書局.
17. （清）陳廷焯,（清）屈興國（校注）(1983).白雨齋詞話足本校注.山東:齊魯書社.
18. （清）甯楷(1965).宜興縣志.臺北:新興書局.
19. （清）萬樹(2013).詞律.上海:上海古籍出版社.
20. （清）鄒祇謨(2005).遠志齋詞衷.北京:中華書局.
21. （清）蔣景祁（編）(2002).瑤華集.上海:上海古籍出版社.
22. （清）蔡嵩雲(2005).柯亭詞論.北京:中華書局.
23. （清）聶先（編）(2002).百名家詞.上海:上海古籍出版社.
24. 王兆鵬(2004).詞學史料學.北京:中華書局.
25. 江合友(2008).明清詞譜史.上海:上海古籍出版社.
26. 余意(2009).明代詞學之建構.上海:上海古籍出版社.
27. 施蟄存（編）(1994).詞籍序跋萃編.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
28. 唐圭璋（編）(1998).全宋詞.北京:中華書局.
29. 夏承燾(1997).夏承燾集.杭州:浙江古籍出版社.
30. 張仲謀(2002).明詞史.北京:人民文學出版社.
31. 張宏生（編）(2008).全清詞・順康卷補編.南京:南京大學出版社.
32. 張宏生（編）(2002).全清詞・順康卷.南京:南京大學出版社.
33. 陳乃乾（輯）(1982).清名家詞．湖海樓詞.上海:上海書店.
34. 馮乾（編校）(2013).清詞序跋彙編.南京:鳳凰出版社.
35. 趙秀紅(2016).瑤華集與清初詞壇.河南:鄭州大學出版社.
36. 蕭鵬(1992).群體的選擇─唐宋人選詞與詞選通論.臺北:文津出版社.
37. 嚴迪昌(2001).清詞史.南京:江蘇古籍出版社.