题名 |
Aeronautical Decision-Making Training Mnemonics: Experts and Novices Evaluated Five Alternative Methods |
DOI |
10.6459/JCM.200609_3(2).0001 |
作者 |
W. C. Li;F. E. Wu;T. H. Li |
关键词 |
Aeronautical decision-making (ADM) ; Human error ; Situation assessment ; Risk management ; Time pressure |
期刊名称 |
危機管理學刊 |
卷期/出版年月 |
3卷2期(2006 / 09 / 01) |
页次 |
1 - 8 |
内容语文 |
英文 |
英文摘要 |
The purposes of this study was to analyze the suitability of ADM mnemonics, from the perspectives of instructor pilots and cadet pilots, as a basis for ADM training across a range of different tactical environments. Sixty instructor pilots and forty-seven cadet pilots in the Republic of China Air Force Academy participated. They assessed the suitability of five different ADM mnemonics (SHOR-Wohl, 1981; PASS -Maher, 1989; FOR-DEC-Hormann, 1995; SOAR-Oldaker, 1995; and DESIDE-Murray, 1997) in the 6 different basic types of decision-making situation described by Orasanu (1993): go/no go decisions; recognition-primed decisions; response selection; resource management decisions; non-diagnostic procedure, and problem-solving. The findings indicated that SHOR was regarded as the most suitable mnemonic for application in time-limited and critical, urgent situations. DESIDE was thought to be superior for knowledge-based decisions which needed more comprehensive consideration but were less time limited. |
主题分类 |
社會科學 >
管理學 |
参考文献 |
|