题名

廣域災害衝擊傳播論都市基礎設施耐災韌性危機

并列篇名

A Study of Disaster Resilience Among Urban Infrastructure Based on Cascading Effects

DOI

10.6459/JCM.202009_17(2).0002

作者

許智豪(C. H. Hsu)；鄧敏政(M. C. Teng)

关键词

基礎設施 ； 災害衝擊傳播 ； 耐災韌性 ； Infrastructure ； Cascading Effects ； Disaster Resilience

期刊名称

危機管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

17卷2期（2020 / 09 / 01）

页次

11 - 20

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

都市在廣域災害下基礎設施常受到損壞，並導致都會機能受系統相互影響傳播而衝擊到正常的運作，如維生、運輸機能、金融、疫病、及防救災等面向，倘若設施失效除衝擊基本民生服務、社會經濟外，民心士氣也將受到影響（民眾信心、國際形象）。基礎設施為都市機能的命脈、支持各重要設施的核心業務，根據聯合國減災風險辦公室（UNDRR）於2015年頒布「仙台減災綱領」中，強調基礎設施韌性提升方案，藉解析設施系統相互關聯、抑止影響傳播，來維持設施災後持續運作功能；然現今國內對於基礎設施相互影響傳播觀念較缺乏，因此本研究藉彙整國內外廣域災害案例文獻，並以2017年815全臺大停電為例，將災害衝擊傳播理論結合情境模擬，來探討災害期間基礎設施相互影響性（電力、自來水、醫療院所），與面臨的耐災韌性危機。本研究結果可以提供都市管理者作為災害管理與危機處理之參考應用。
英文摘要

Infrastructure is defined as an aggregation of numerous facilities that constitute the backbone of urban operations. The wide-area disaster event adversely affect infrastructure, severely impairing most urban functions. The Infrastructure have interdependencies; thus damage to one system can potentially cause a chain reaction, triggering failures in related and connected systems that then lead to a cascade of disasters or failures. Taiwan is located in natural disaster frequently occur. Therefore, understanding the effects of wide-area disaster on the infrastructure, as well as how those effects contribute to disaster scenarios in urban area, is a critical issue for the Taiwanese government. This study considered the direct damages and cascading effects to develop a method for impact chain assessment on infrastructure during disaster. Therefore, the result of this study assistant the authority to make an intelligent decision for infrastructure disaster or resource management.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. abc news, (2017). “Fresh flames rage at Texas chemical plant flooded byHarvey,”Retrieved Sep. 1, 2017, from https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-chemical-plant-fire-federal-investigation-launched/story?id=49548581
  2. National Infrastructure Protection Plan 2013 “NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience,”from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/National-Infrastructure-Protection-Plan-2013-508.pdf
  3. Bruneau, M.,Chang, S.E.,Eguchi, R.T.,Lee, G.C.,O’Rourke, T.D,Reinhorn, A.M.,Shinozuka, M.,Tierney, K.,Wallace, W.A.,von Winterfeldt, D.(2003).A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities.Earthquake Spectra,19(4),737-738.
  4. Hassel, H.,Johansson, J.,Cedergren, A.(2014).D2.1.CascEff Project (FP7 EU project 607665)D2.1.CascEff Project (FP7 EU project 607665),未出版
  5. Lloyd’s. (2018). “Lloyd's City Risk Index 2015-2025,” from https://cityriskindex. Lloyds.com.
  6. Maplecroft. (2011). “Natural Hazards Risk Atlas 2011: Nations Most Exposed to Natural Disasters,” from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011//08/12/natural-hazards-risk-tlas_n_925518.html
  7. Omer, M.,Mostashari, A.,Nilchiani, R.,Mansouri, M.(2012).2012. A framework for assessing resiliency of maritime transportation systems.Maritime Policy and Management,39(7),6865-6703.
  8. Rinaldi, Steven M.,Peerenboom, James P.,Kelly, Terrence K.(2001).Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies.IEEE Control Systems Magazine,21(6),11-25.
  9. UNDRR(2019).Words in Action Guideline: Implementation guide for local disaster risk reduction and resilience strategies.Geneva:UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, USA.
  10. World Bank(2005).,未出版
  11. 中央災害應變中心(2014)。,台北:行政院。
  12. 內政部(2016)。,台北:內政部。
  13. 日本內閣府(2018). “平成 30 年北海道胆振いぶり東部地震に係る被害状況等について ,” 取自http://www.bousai.go.jp/updates/h30jishin_hokkaido/pdf/300920_jishin_hokkaido_01.pdf.
  14. 行政院(2016)。,台北:行政院。
  15. 傅鏸漩,林美君,謝蕙如,許智豪,黃柏誠,張志新(2018)。颶風哈維(Harvey)對德州衝擊影響。災害防救電子報，152
  16. 傅鏸漩,施虹如,張志新(2019)。2018.年全球重大天然災害回顧。災害防救電子報，165
  17. 維基百科 (2010). “墨西哥灣漏油事件,”取自 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010 年墨西哥灣漏油事故
  18. 鄧敏政,許智豪(2018)。從災例中探討都市維生系統之災防管理課題。2018 臺灣災害管理研討會，台北:
print cancel