餐飲技職體系學生人體計測與實驗室工作器材之評量

Ergonomic Assessment on Anthropometry and Lab Equipment for Foodservice Vocational Student

10.6572/JHHE.3(3).7

全中妤(Jong-Yu Chyuan)

人體計測 ； 工作平台高度 ； 頻率／施力／距離感覺 ； Anthropometry ； lab equipment height ； repetition/force/distance perception

餐旅暨家政學刊

3卷3期（2006 / 09 / 01）

427 - 435

繁體中文

This paper considers standards relevant to foodservice vocational laboratory's environmental ergonomics. It includes description of student anthropometric, perceived frequency/exertion/distance ratings, and lab equipment height. A cross-section survey was conducted in 519 students. Male (46.3%) and female (53.7%) students were aged 20.28 years. They used to perform job by right hand (92.1%). The average male/female height: 172.87/160.81cm, with elbow height: 107.28/100.42 cm. Although female had less hand grip and back strength compared to male, they had better back flexibility. Male had normal weight-length index (0.9≤WHI≤1.09)，but female were lighter (0.8≤WHI≤0.89). However, both of them had normal body mass index (18.5≤BBMI≤24). They took lab work as light-heavy job according to their frequency/exertion/distance perception. Their desired working table height (male 88.61/female 86.45cm), cutting board height(male 89.16/female 86.94cm), and sink height (male 91.27/female 89.3cm) were all agreed with ergonomist's recommendation (below elbow 10-15cm). Despite a number of anthropometric factors being fitted into the regression model, they only account for less 23.1% R^2 of the overall variation in desired working height.

This paper considers standards relevant to foodservice vocational laboratory's environmental ergonomics. It includes description of student anthropometric, perceived frequency/exertion/distance ratings, and lab equipment height. A cross-section survey was conducted in 519 students. Male (46.3%) and female (53.7%) students were aged 20.28 years. They used to perform job by right hand (92.1%). The average male/female height: 172.87/160.81cm, with elbow height: 107.28/100.42 cm. Although female had less hand grip and back strength compared to male, they had better back flexibility. Male had normal weight-length index (0.9≤WHI≤1.09)，but female were lighter (0.8≤WHI≤0.89). However, both of them had normal body mass index (18.5≤BBMI≤24). They took lab work as light-heavy job according to their frequency/exertion/distance perception. Their desired working table height (male 88.61/female 86.45cm), cutting board height(male 89.16/female 86.94cm), and sink height (male 91.27/female 89.3cm) were all agreed with ergonomist's recommendation (below elbow 10-15cm). Despite a number of anthropometric factors being fitted into the regression model, they only account for less 23.1% R^2 of the overall variation in desired working height.

1. 全中妤、杜宗禮、葉文裕、李中一(2002)。台灣旅館業餐飲人員工作動作特性與肌肉骨骼傷病之橫斷式研究。台灣公共衛生雜誌，21(2)，140-149。
   連結：
2. Hsu, C. H. C.(2002).The curriculum reform and trends of hospitality higher education development in United States.Proceedings of 2002 Hospitality Education International Conference
3. Taiwan labor anthropometry data base
4. Konz, S.(1995).Work design-industrial ergonomics.Scottsdale, AZ:Publishing Horizons, Inc.
5. Kroemer, K,Kroemer, H.,Kroemer-Elbert, K.(1994).Ergonomics.N.J.:Prentice Hall.
6. Kruorinka, I.(Eds),Forcier, L. (Eds)(1995).Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): a reference book for prevention.London:Taylor & Francis.
7. Mizoue, T.,Nishisaka, S.,Nishikuma, K.,Yoshimura, T.(1996).Occupational and lifestyle factors related to musculoskeletal and fatigue symptoms among middle-aged female workers in a frozen food processing factory.Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi,38(5),223-229.
8. Pheasant, S. T.,Richardson, B.,Eastlake, A. (ed.)(1994).Physiotherapy in Occupational Health. Management, Prevention & Health Promotion in the Work Place.Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd.
9. 林燕慧(2001)。工作取向動作控制於下背痛物理治療之應用－以持重抬舉爲例。FJPT，26(5)，241-245。
10. 張一岑(1998)。人因工程學。台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。