多元智能側面圖應用於大學志願選擇之研究

Using a Multiple Intelligences Profile in the Selection of a Major Discipline

10.7118/JHSS.201006.0013

呂勝瑛(Sheng-Ying Lii)；翁淑緣(Shu-Yeng Wong)

多元智能側面圖 ； 大學主修科系選擇 ； 性別差異 ； multiple intelligences profile ； college major selection ； sex differences

人文暨社會科學期刊

6卷1期（2010 / 06 / 01）

13 - 30

繁體中文

本研究由參加第九屆(2003)大學博覽會的應屆考生中取得1651人爲研究對象，進行多元智能的測量及志願就讀學院的調查。研究發現全體男女學生的多元智能有顯著的差異，男生強於數學、邏輯、空間、肢體－動覺及自然的智能，女生強於語文、音樂、人際及內省的智能。同時也發現每個學院吸引各有其優勢及弱勢智能的學生。志願就讀人文社會學門與理工學門的學生，其優勢與弱勢智能正好相反，人際、內省及語文智能爲選擇就讀人文社會學門學生的優勢智能，而爲選讀理工學院學生的弱勢智能；空間、自然、及邏輯－數學智能爲選讀理工學門學生的優勢智能，而爲選讀人文社會學門學生的弱勢智能。選讀藝能學門之學院的學生，在音樂、肢體－動覺、及空間智能的優勢則各有不同。本研究建議，學生可以利用多元智能側面圖來辨識自己的優勢及弱勢智能，作爲選系的參考。

The sample for this study consisted of 1651 students who had taken the College Entrance Exam, participated in the 9th College Exhibition, and chosen the academic fields they wanted to enter. The participants were asked to complete our Multiple Intelligence Scale. With regard to gender differences, it was found that male students have higher logical-mathematical, spatial, naturalistic, and bodily-kinesthetic intelligences; whereas, female students have higher linguistic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and musical intelligences. The data also revealed that students who are interested in different academic schools have their strengths and weaknesses in different intelligences. In our analysis of the obtained data, students headed for a School of Humanities and Social sciences were compared with those planning to enroll in a School of Engineering and Science. The former had strengths in interpersonal, intrapersonal, and linguistic intelligences; whereas, these were shown to be weaknesses for the latter. Similarly, the former had weaknesses in spatial, naturalistic, and logical-mathematical intelligences; whereas, these were indicated as strengths for the latter. Students who chose academic schools which provide training in artistic skills had different strengths in musical, spatial, and bodily-kinesthetic intelligences than those who chose other types of schools. Therefore, it is suggested that the use of multiple intelligences profile can help students to identify their own superior and inferior intelligences. The same instrument can also serve as a guideline for selecting a major discipline.

1. Armstrong, T.(1994).Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom.Alexandria, Va:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
2. Azar, A.(2006).Relationship of multiple intelligences profiles with area of concentration in high school and university entrance exam scores.Educational Administration: Theory & Practice,46,157-174.
3. Bowd, A. D.,Brady, P. H.(2003).Gender differences in mathematics anxiety among preservice teachers and perceptions of their elementary and secondary school experience with mathematics.The Alberta Journal of Education Research,9(1),24-36.
4. Campbell, L.,Campbell, B.(1999).Multiple intelligences and student success: Success stories from six schools.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Chan, D. W.(2003).Multiple intelligences and perceived self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong.Educational Psychology,23(5),521-533.
6. Chen, J.,Krechevsky, M.,Viens, J.(1998).Building on children's strengths: The experience of project spectrum.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
7. Delgado, A. R.,Prieto, G.(2003).Cognitive mediators and sex-related differences in mathematics.Intelligence,32,25-32.
8. Furnham, A.,Chamorro-Premuzic, T.(2005).Estimating one's own and one's relatives' multiple intelligence: A study from Argentina.Spanish Journal of Psychology,8(1),12-20.
9. Furnham, A.,Clark, K.,Bailey, K.(1999).Sex differences in estimates of multiple intelligences.European Journal of personality,13(4),247-259.
10. Furnham, A.,Hosoe, T.,Tang, T. L. P.(2001).Male hubris and female humility? A cross-cultural study of ratings of self, parental, and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain, and Japan.Intelligences,30,101-115.
11. Furnham, A.,Rakow, T.,Sarmany-Schuller, I.,De Frugt, F.(1999).European differences in self-perceived multiple intelligence.European Psychologist,4,131-138.
12. Furnham, A.,Shahidi, S.,Baluch, B.(2002).Sex and culture differences in self-perceived and family estimated multiple intelligence: A British-Iranian comparison.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33,270-285.
13. Furnham, A.,Tang, T. L. P.,Lester, D.,O''Connor, R.,Montgomery, R.(2002).Estimates of ten multiple intelligences - Sex and national differences in the perception of oneself and famous people.European Psychologist,7(4),245-255.
14. Furnham, A.,Ward, C.(2001).Sex differnces, test experience and the self-estimation of multiple intelligences.New Zealand Journal of Psychology,30(2),52-59.
15. Gardner, H.(1997).Multiple intelligences as a partner in school improvement.Educational Leadership,55(1),20-22.
16. Gardner, H.(1999).Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.New York, NY:Basic Books.
17. Gardner, H.(1993).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York, NY:Basic Books.
18. Guilford, J. P.(1967).The nature of human intelligence.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
19. Honigsfeld, A.,Dunn, R.(2003).High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations.Journal of Educational Research,96(4),1-12.
20. Loori, A. A.(2005).Multiple intelligences: A comparative study between the preferences of males and females.Social Behavior and Personality,33(1),77-88.
21. Moir, A.,Jessel, D.(1993).Brain sex: The real difference between men and women.London:Penguin Books Ltd.
22. Neto, F.,Ruiz, F.,Furnham, A.(2008).Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Portuguese adolescents.High Ability Studies,19(2),189-204.
23. Rammstedt, B.,Rammsayer, T.(2000).Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence.Personality and Individual Differences,29,869-880.
24. Royster, D. C.,Harris, M. K.,Schoeps, N.(1999).Dispositions of college mathematics students.International Hournal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology,3,317-333.
25. Shearer, C. B.(2004).Using a multiple intelligences assessment to promote teacher development and student achievement.Teachers College Record,106(1),147-162.
26. Shearer, C. B.(1994).The MIDAS: A professional manual.Kent, OH:MI Research and Consulting.
27. Shore, J. R.(2001).The George Washington University.
28. Silver, H.,Strong, R.,Perini, M.(1997).Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences.Educational Leadership,55(1),22-27.
29. Sternberg, R. J.(1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of humanintelligence.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Yuen, M.,Furnham, A.(2005).Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents.High Ability Studies,16(2),187-199.
31. 王淑芬(2002)。屏東，屏東師範學院數理教育研究所。
32. 田耐青(1999)。多元智能論：學習是可以快樂的、成功的。台北:世紀領袖出版社。
33. 余民寧(2003)。多元智能理論教學評量省思。教育研究月刊，110，57-67。
34. 吳武典(2003)。多元智能理與學校經營。教育研究月刊，110，20-40。
35. 吳毓津(1997)。中壢，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
36. 林怡君(2004)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
37. 邱連煌(1998)。啟發兒童的智能：多元智能理論在教學上的應用。資優教育教師專業知能研討會—多元智能與成功智能的理論與實務會議手冊，台北:
38. 金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫(1993)。興趣量表編製之研究報告（一）。台北:中華民國大學入學考試中心。
39. 張美玉(2001)。從多元智能的觀點談歷程檔案評量在教育上的應用。教育研究資訊，9(1)，32-54。
40. 張瓊友(2001)。新竹，國立新竹師範學院課程與教學研究所。
41. 曾才銘(2001)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
42. 雷敏君(2001)。台北，國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所。
43. 歐慧敏(2002)。台北，國立政治大學教育學系。
44. 鄭博真(2003)。多元智能理論及其在課程教學與評量革新之應用。初等教育學報，16，111-142。
45. 簡維君(2001)。多元智能的評量與教學。資優教育季刊，78，1-7。

1. 陳文長、徐偉庭、周宏室(2012)。青少年版肢體動覺智慧量表之發展。體育學報，45(2)，157-166。
2. 翁淑緣(2013)。大學生之多元智能、自我效能和學習意願。人文暨社會科學期刊，9(2)，1-16。