以激發學習潛力探討數學短期課後補習的學習效能

The Stimulation of Learning Potential: An Exploration of the Effects of Short Term Supplemental Instruction on Mathematics Learning

陳美惠(Mei-Huei Chen)

補習文化 ； 課外補習 ； 學習能力 ； Supplemental Instruction Culture ； Extra Instruction ； Learning Ability

人文暨社會科學期刊

10卷2期（2014 / 12 / 01）

1 - 9

繁體中文

數學是具思考性且失敗率高的學科，影響學生學習的意願，而數學是一門必修的基礎課程作為之後專業應用所準備，避免學習的挫折才能延續未來專業的追求。許多學生自貶不如人而放棄學習，對於這些有學習能力的低成就學生，利用適當的方式和時機給予額外補習教學，激發學習潛力以完成基本數學學習。本研究以國三學生參加第二次基測重點數學補習的一次基測pr值介於25%～65%的學生為對象，給予短期加強補習。由前後測詴的成績，發現學生為求進入理想學府，努力學習，以積極的學習動機、展現補習成效，分數呈現顯著的進步。現今教育追求更適切的改革，希望孩子有信心於困難的學習並有充裕的時間邁向多專業的培養，舊式傳統的長期補習文化應配合科技時代作調整改革。

Learning a thoughtful subject of mathematics easily approached to fail. Students learned it with low willingness. Mathematics is a required basic course for preparation as a professional application. In order to have professional pursuits in the future, it is necessary to avoid the frustration of learning. Many students gave up learning from self-deprecating. Those students who had not high achievement were possessing abilities of learning mathematics. They could be administrated the supplemental instruction by appropriate methods and suitable time to stimulate learning potential and finished the fundamental knowledge of mathematics. The samples were from the ninth graders and attempted to take the second Basic Test. Of the PR value between 25% and 65% in their first Basic Test, these students were taught with short term extra instruction. By the results of before and after tests, we found students aimed at good college and were eager to learn. They had positive motivation and tried to get better achievement. Education reformation pursued an appropriate improvement nowadays. We hope students have confidence in math learning and keep plenty of time to cultivate multi-aspects of skills. In the technological era, the reformation of traditional long-term supplemental instruction should be considered.

1. 林大森、陳憶芬(2006)。台灣高中生參加補習之效益分析。教育研究集刊，52(4)，35-70。
   連結：
2. 林忠正、黃璀娟(2009)。補習文化。人文及社會科學集刊，21(4)，587-643。
   連結：
3. 張新仁(2000)。補救教學面面觀。九年一貫課程改革下補救教學方案研習會
   連結：
4. 梁育維、陳芳慶(2009)。高中二年級數學科補救教學成效之前驅研究。中等教育，60(2)，112-127。
   連結：
5. Dewey, J. (1917). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
6. 李佩芬 (2005)。五招擺脫「數學恐懼症」。親子天下。2011年1 月5 日，擷取自 http://parenting.cw.com.tw/web/docDetail.do?docId=2083
7. UMKC Supplemental Instruction Website. (2003). Overview of supplemental instruction. Retrieved October 5, 2003, from http://www.umkc.edu/cad/si/index.htm
8. 台灣教育部 (2002)。台灣地區中等以下各級學校學生學習及生活概況調查摘要報告。2010 年3 月24 日，擷取自 http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/STATISTICS/EDU7220001/project/k902.htm
9. Carlson, S. A.(1985).The ethical appropriateness of subject-matter tutoring for learning disabled adolescents.Learning Disability Quarterly,8,310-314.
10. Cook, T. D.,Campbell, D. T.(1979).Quasi-experimentation design & analysis issues for field settings.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflinc.
11. Doidge, N.(2008).The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science.:Brilliance Audio.
12. Fan, X.,Chen, M.,Matsumoto, A. R.(1997).Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Findings from the national education longitudinal study of 1988.Journal of Experimental Education,65,229-242.
13. Hock, M. F.,Schumaker, J. B.,Deshler, D. D.(1995).Training strategic tutors to enhance learner independence.Journal of Developmental Education,19,18-26.
14. Sternberg, R. J.(1986).Intelligence Applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills.New York:Harcourt Brace & Company.
15. Stevenson, D. L.,Baker, D. P.(1992).Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan.American Journal of Sociology,97(6),1639-1657.
16. Tinto, V.(1987).Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
17. 王文科(1991)。學習心理學─學習理論導論。台北:五南。
18. 邱孟德(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所。
19. 洪蘭(1999)。活用智慧： 超越IQ 的心智訓練。台北:遠流。
20. 張新仁(2001)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。
21. 許崇憲(2010)。高中學生參加補習的情境決定因素及對學業成績的影響。教育與心理研究，33(3)，77 -105。
22. 陳美惠(2008)。數學課外補習長度和學習成效相關性的探討─以中部三個不同學制的高中職為例。僑光學報，30，173-180。
23. 楊孟麗譯、謝水南譯、Fraenkel, J. R.、Wallen, N. E(2003)。教育研究法 : 研究設計實務。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
24. 魏敏媛(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所。
25. 關秉寅、李敦義(2008)。補習數學有用嗎？一個「反事實」的分析。臺灣社會學刊，41，97-148。