系統特性、任務特性與電腦自我效能對個人線上學習行為傾向影響

The Effects of Technology Characteristics, Task Characteristics and Computer Self-efficacy on Behavioral Intention of Electronic Learning

10.6188/JEB.2007.9(2).02

邱郁文(Yuh-Wen Chiu)；林益民(Yi-Min Lin)；施東河(Dong-Her Shih)

線上學習 ； 自我效能 ； 任務科技配適模式 ； 科技接受模式 ； 結構化方程式模型 ； E-learning ； self-efficacy ； Task-Technology fit model TTF ； Technology Acceptance Model TAM ； Structured Equation Model SEM

電子商務學報

9卷2期（2007 / 06 / 01）

235 - 266

繁體中文

線上學習提供了一個跨越時間區隔與空間距離、沒有人數限制的學習途徑。雖然線上學習的學習方式不論在時間上、空間上均有很大的彈性，但學習者需更有自律精神及明瞭自己學習的目的、需求、學習動機與自我效能，方能引發學習者的使用意願，進而增加學習的效果。 本研究綜合「自我效能」、「科技接受模式」與「任務科技配適模式」的觀點，提出「個人線上學習行為傾向」因果模式，經結構化方程式模型之建構與實證。就線上學習系統採用而言，研究結果發現：(1)任務（教材內容）、科技（彈性、互動性、系統規範）、個人特質（線上學習自我效能、意見領袖與相容性）三者配合愈高，愈會正向影響個人使用線上學習的有用與易用的信念。(2)任務、科技、個人特質三者相互的配合，方能影響個人的知覺有用，再轉而正向影響其使用意願。(3)使用態度對使用傾向的影響最顯著，其次為配適度、知覺有用與知覺易用。

People can learn anytime and anywhere by Electronic learning (e-learning), but the context of Electronic learning and the role of learner differ from the traditional classroom. Electronic learning make learning more flexible and interactive, and more self-regulation, self-efficacy, goal setting seem more necessary. This paper integrates self-efficacy, technology acceptance model and task-technology fit model to explore the behavior and intention of e-learning user. A framework of e-learning behavioral intention model was proposed and verified by Structure Equation Model (SEM). The data showed that (1) the fit of Task (content quality), technology (flexibility, interactivity and system norm) and personal characteristic (e-learning self-efficacy, opinion leadership and compatibility) has positive effect on the belief of ease and usefulness. (2) The relationship between perceived usefulness and the intention was indirect by the influence of fitting. (3) Attitudes toward E-learning has most significant influence on the behavioral intention to use E-learning, then the fitting, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.

1. Ajzen, I(1991).The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organization Behavior Human Decision Process.
2. Ajzen, I.(1989).Attitude, Personality, and Behavior.
3. Ajzen, I.(2002).Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
4. Ajzen, I.,J. Kuh,J. Bechmann(1985).Form intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior.Action Control Form Cognition to Behavior.
5. Ajzen, I.,M. Fishbein(1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
6. Arbaugh, J. B.(2000).Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA.Journal of Management Education.
7. Auster, E.,C. W. Choo(1993).Environmental scanning by CEOs in two Canadian industries.Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
8. Bagozzi, R. P.,Y. Yi(1988).On the evaluation for structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
9. Bandura, A(1978).The self-system in reciprocal determinism.American Psychologist.
10. Bandura, A(1989).Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.Development Psychology.
11. Bandura, A(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist.
12. Bandura, A(1991).Social cognitive theory of self-regulation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
13. Bandura, A.(1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
14. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.
15. Baumgartner, H.,C. Homburg(1996).Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review.International Journal of Research in Marketing.
16. Benford, T. L.,J. E. Hunton(2000).Incorporating information technology considerations into an expanded model of judgment and decision making in accounting.International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.
17. Bentler, P. M.(1992).On the fit of models to covariance and methodology to the bulletin.Psychological Bulletin.
18. Bentler, P. M.(1990).Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin.
19. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York:John Wiley and Sons.
20. Burns, J.,J. Clift,J. Duncan(1990).Understanding of understanding: implications for learning and teaching.British Journal of Educational Psychology.
21. Carmines, E.,J. Mclver,Bohmstedt G.,E. Borgatta,Beverly Hills(1981).Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures.Social measurement: Current Issues,Calif:
22. Chin, W. W.,A. Gopal(1995).Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs.DATABASE.
23. Chin, W.W.,P. Todd(1995).On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution.MIS Quarterly.
24. Chiu, C. M.,M. H. Hsu,S. Y. Sun,T. C. Lin,P. C. Sun(2005).Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions.Computers & Education.
25. Compeau, D. R.,C. A. Higgins(1995).Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test.MIS Quarterly.
26. Culnan, M. J.(1985).The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: implications for the delivery of information systems and services.Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
27. Daft, R. L.,R. H. Lengel(1986).A Proposed Integration Among Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design.Management Science.
28. Davis, F. D.(1986).A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information System: Theory and Results, Doctoral dissertation.
29. Davis, F. D.(1993).User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies.
30. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly.
31. Davis, F. D.,R. P. Bagozzi,P. R. Warshaw(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science.
32. Dennis, A. R,B. H. Wixom,R. J. Vandenberg(2001).Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis.MIS Quarterly.
33. DeSanctis, G.,M. Poole(1994).Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use : Adaptive Structuration Theory.Organization Science.
34. Dickerson, M. D.,J. W. Gentry(1983).Characteristics of adopter and non-adopters of home computers.Journal of Consumer Research.
35. Dishawa, M. T.,D. M. Strong(1999).Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs.Information and Management.
36. Eastlick, M. A.(1993).Predictors of videotex adoption.Journal of Direct Marketing.
37. Fenech, T.(1998).Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the worldwide web.Computer Networks and ISDN Systems.
38. Fleming, M. L.,W. H. Levie(1993).Instructional message design. Principles from the behavioral and cognitive science.
39. Fornell, C.,D. F. Larcker(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobervables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research.
40. Gist, M. E.,C. Schwoerer,B. Rosen(1989).Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training.Journal of Applied Psychology.
41. Goldsmith, R. E.,S. J. Newell(1997).Innovativeness and price sensitivity: managerial, theoretical and methodological issues.Journal of Product and Brand Management.
42. Goodhue, D. L.,R. L. Thompson(1995).Task-technology fit and individual performance.MIS Quarterly.
43. Hair, J. F.,R. E Anderson,R. L. Tatham,W. C. Black(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.
44. Hannafin, M.,L. Rieber(1989).Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part I.Educational Technology Research and Development.
45. Henderson, R.,D. Rickwood,P. Roberts(1998).The beta test of an electronic supermarket.Interacting with Computers.
46. Henry, J. W.,R. W. Stone(1997).The development of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales in a nonvolitional context.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers.
47. Hoffer, J. A.,M. B. Alexander(1992).The Diffusion of Database Machines.DATABASE.
48. Joreskog, K. G.,D. Sorbom(1992).LISREL: A Guide to the Program and Applications.
49. Kettanurak, V.,K. Ramamurthy,W. D. Haseman(2001).User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles.International Journal Human-Computer Studies.
50. Klaus, T.,T. Gyires,H. W. Joseph(2003).The use of Web-based information systems for non-work activities: An empirical study.Human Systems Management.
51. Klobas, J. E.,L. A. Clyde(2000).Adults learning to use the Internet: a longitudinal study of attitudes and other factors associated with intended Internet use.Library and Information Science Researc.
52. Klopping I. M.,E. McKinney(2004).Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce.Information Technology Learning, and Performance Journal.
53. Legrisa, P.,J. Inghamb,P. Collerette(2003).Why do people use information technoogy? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.Information and Management.
54. Lern=Learning Resources Network(1998).Online education: Growing presence and growing pains.Lifelong Learning Today.
55. Martocchio, J. J.(1994).Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training.Journal of Applied Psychology.
56. Mathieson, K.(1991).Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.Information System Research.
57. Mathieson, K.,M. Keil(1998).Beyond the interface: ease of use and task/technology fit.Information and Management.
58. Moore, M. H.,G. Kearsley(1996).Distance Education- A System View.
59. Ong, C. S.,J. Y. Lai(2006).Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance.Computers in Human Behavior.
60. Ong, C. S.,J. Y. Lai,Y. S. Wang(2004).Factors Affecting Engineers` Acceptance of Asynchronous E-learning Systems in High-tech Companies.Information and Management.
61. Orlikowski, W. J.,D. Robey(1991).Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations.Information Systems Research.
62. Repman, J.,S. Logan(1996).Interaction at a Distance Possible Barriers and Collaborative Solutions.Techtrends,41(6),38.
63. Rogers, E. M.(1983).Diffusion of innovations, third edition.
64. Rosenberg, J. M.(2001).E-learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age.
65. Schunk, D. H.,Schunk D. H.,B. J.,Zimmerman(1994).Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings.Self-regulation of Learning and Performance.
66. Szajna, B.(1996).Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science.
67. Taylor, S.,P. A. Todd(1995).Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience.MIS Quarterly.
68. Teo, T. S. H.,V. K. G. Lim,R. Y. C. Lai(1999).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage.The International Journal of Management Science,27(1),25-37.
69. Venkatesh, V.,F. D. Davis(2000).A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.Management Science.
70. Venkatraman, M. P.(1990).Opinion leadership, enduring involvement and characteristics of opinion leaders: a moderating or mediating relationship?.Advances in Consumer Research.
71. Vessey, I.,D. Galletta(1991).Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition.Information systems research.
72. Wang, Y. S.(2003).Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems.Information and Management.
73. Weller, H.(1988).Interactivity in microcomputer-based instruction: its essential components and how it can be enhanced.Educational Technology.
74. Wheeler, B. C.,J. S. Valacich(1996).Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment.Information Systems Research.
75. Wood, R.,A. Bandura(1989).Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
76. Zigurs, I.,B. K. Buckland,J. R. Connolly,E. V. Wilson(1999).A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems.ACMSIGMIS Database.

1. 蔡文龍,徐濟世(2021)。以設計思考開發運用臉部表情辨識學習狀態之非同步遠距教學系統。科技管理學刊，26(2)，25-53。
2. 陳鴻基,張伊婷,李爵安,吳岳穎(2023)。專案目標、目標承諾與專案績效之探討：大數據分析解決方案。電子商務學報，25(3)，241-279。
3. 許致嘉、李慶芳、朱彩馨(2014)。知易行難：以施行理論觀點探索數位學習導入失敗。中山管理評論，22(4)，857-900。
4. 林宜蓁(2009)。原住民學生族語數位學習之研究。中華印刷科技年報，2009，595-607。
5. 蘇竑彰,陳德霖,邱德原,邱紹群(2022)。玩賞YouTube雙語標竿EMI課程教學之實踐。管理實務與理論研究，16(2)，81-99。
6. 顏奕仁、林裕勛、周惠文(2010)。個人工作績效之探討—整合任務科技配適模式與社會認知理論。中原企管評論，8(1)，143-165。
7. 鄭青展、蔡明春、張雅媛(2010)。台灣互動電視潛在消費者行為意向模式。台北海洋技術學院學報，3(2)，24-53。
8. 鄭宇珊、吳銘達(2010)。教師教學行為、學生學習動機對學習成效之影響：階層線性模式分析。中等教育，61(3)，32-51。