以本體論及Bloom分類為基礎之電腦輔助題庫產製系統架構

Computer-Aided Generation of Item Banks Based on Ontology and Bloom's Taxonomy

10.6188/JEB.2007.9(4).02

應鳴雄(Ming-Hsiung Ying)；楊亨利(Heng-Li Yang)

線上測驗 ； 測驗題庫 ； Bloom教育目標分類 ； 本體論 ； 詞彙網路 ； Online Test ； Test lien ； Bank ； Bloom's Taxonomy ； Ontology ； Semantic Web

電子商務學報

9卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

653 - 687

繁體中文

線上學習與線上測驗已成為資訊教育的重要議題。學習者是否達到線上學習系統設定的教育目標，可藉由線上測驗來評量其學習成效。線上測驗應不只是在測驗後給予受測者一個分數，而應讓學習者了解自己在知識向度及認知向度的學習結果，因此測驗系統試題應包含Bloom教育目標分類資訊、本研究提出一個能輔助教師產製題庫的線上測驗系統架構，期望電腦所產製的試題能涵蓋新版Bloom認知領域教育目標分類中的知識向度及認知向度概念。本研究的成果不僅能減少教師人工出題的負擔，系統輔助產製的試題也能評量事實、概念及程序等三種知識及記憶、了解、應用、分析及評鑑等五種認知向度能力、雖然目前尚無法產製屬於創造認知層次的試題，但是卻已能產製的試題已能更有意義的來評量學習成效。

The on-line learning and testing have been as important topics of information education. Students could take online test to evaluate their achievements to learning goals. However, the results of test should give student scores as well as the evaluation on the achievement of knowledge and cognition levels. Currently teachers still need to spend much time on producing and maintaining on-line testing item banks. This research has applied ontology. Chinese semantic database, artificial intelligence, Bloom's taxonomy, to propose an on-line testing system framework to assist teachers in creating test items. As the result, the computer would assist teachers to produce a large number of test items quickly. These test items would cover three types of knowledge (factual, conceptual, and procedural) and five dimensions of cognitive skills (remember, understand, apply, analyze, and evaluate), though there are still no items to test 'creative' skill. These test items could be used to assess the learning level meani ngfully.

1. 楊亨利、應鳴雄(2006)。具備智慧型模糊評分機制之線上測驗系統架構。資訊管理學報，13(1)，41-74。
   連結：
2. Alderson. J.C.(2000).Technology in Testing: The Present and Future.Elsevier Science Document System,28(4),593-603.
3. Anderson, W.,D.R. Krathwohl(2001).A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Blooms` Educational Objectives.NY:Longman.
4. Bloom, B.S.,M.D. Englehart,E. J. Furst,W.H. Hill,D.R. Krathwohl(1956).A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, The Cognitive Domain.N.Y.:David Mckay.
5. Bunge. M.(1977).Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol.3: Ontology I: The Furniyure of the World.Boston, MA:Reidel.
6. Desai. B.C.(1997).Supporting Discovery in Virtual Libraries.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,48(3),190-204.
7. Devedzic, V.B.(2003).Key Issues in Next-Generation Web-Based Education.IEEE Trans- actions On Systemsm, Man, And cybernetics-PART C: Applications And Reviews,33(3),339-349.
8. Fellbaum, C.(1998).Word Net: An Electronic Lexical Databas.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
9. Fensel, D.,F. Harmelen,I. Horrocks,D.L. McGuinnesm,P.F. Patel-Schneider(2001).OIL: An Ontology Infranstructure For The Semantic Web.IEEE intelligent Systems,16(2),38-45.
10. Flavell, J.H.,Weiner, F.E. (edited),R.H. Kluwe(1987).Metacognition, motivation, and understanding.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
11. Gronlund, N.E.(1998).Assessment of Student Achievement.Needham Heights, M.A.:Allyn & Bacon.
12. Guarino, N.,Guarino, N. (edited),Trentom Italy(1998).Formal Ontology and Information System.Formal Ontology In Information Systems, Proc. Of the 1st International Conference
13. Liu, C.L.,C.H. Wang,Z.M. Gao,S.M. Huang(2005).Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP.Ann Arbor, Michigan:
14. McCormack, D.,D. Jones(1997).Building a Web-Based Education System.N.Y.:Wiley.
15. Mitkov, R.,L. Ha(2003).Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using Natural Language Processing.Edmonton, Canada:
16. Rosenberg, M.J.(2001).E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age.AcGraw-Hill.
17. Sumita, E.,F. Sugaya,S. Yamamoto(2005).Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP.Ann Arbor, Michigan:
18. Uschold, M.,M. Gruninger(1996).Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications.The Knowledge Engineering Review,11(2),93-136.
19. West, C. K.,J. A. Farmer,P. M. Wolff(1991).Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
20. 王俊弘、劉昭麟、高照明(2004)。利用自然語言處理技術自動產生英文克漏詞試題之研究。中華民國計算語言學學會第十六屆自然語言與語音處理研討會論文集
21. 何榮桂(1990)。電腦教學系統中的測驗設計。中等教育，41(2)，29-34。
22. 何榮桂、蘇建誠、郭再興(1996)。遠距適性測驗系統架構。資訊與教育雜誌，42，29-35。
23. 周文正(1998)。WWW上電腦輔助測驗系統之研製。中華民國第七屆電腦輔助教學研討會
24. 林盈達、林義能(1999)。DIYExamer：題庫收集、測驗與鑑別系統及其效能。TANET`99論文集
25. 侯妤青(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學商業教育研究所。
26. 陳英豪、吳裕益(1982)。測驗的編制與應用。台北:偉文出版社。
27. 陳筱菁(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所。
28. 曾憲雄、黃國禎、江孟峰、蔡昌均、林耀聰(2002)。專家系統導論：導論／工具／應用。台北:松崗。
29. 黃居仁(2003)。語意網、詞網與知識本體：淺談未來網路的知識運籌。佛教圖書館館訊，33，1-16。
30. 黃昭義、陳美紀(1999)。電腦輔助測驗之命題模式研究。第八屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會
31. 葉連祺(2000)。教師自編紙筆式測驗試題類型之探討。研習資訊，17(4)，42-53。
32. 葉連祺、林淑萍(2003)。布魯姆認知領域教育部標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究月刊，105，94-106。
33. 蔡松齡(1992)。電腦在題庫命題作業之運用（下）。師友月刊，298，54-58。