數位學習教材之品質認證標準的建立及其信度分析

Establishing Certification Standards for e-Learning Courseware Quality and Analyzing its Reliabilities and Applications

10.6188/JEB.2009.11(4).07

宋曜廷(Yao-Ting Sung)；張國恩(Kuo-En Chang)；林慧藍(Hui-Lan Lin)；李宜芬(Yi-Fen Lee)；陳明溥(Ming-Puu Chen)

數位教材 ； 品質認證 ； 品質認證中心 ； e-Learning Courseware ； Quality Certification ； e-Learning Quality Certification Center

電子商務學報

11卷4期（2009 / 12 / 01）

823 - 845

繁體中文

對數位學習的品質進行認證已是先進國家的趨勢。本研究介紹國內數位學習品質認證中心的數位教材品質認證制度的作法，並以實徵的方式探討認證工具的信度，以及參與認證的數位教材製作廠商在製作數位教材時所遭遇的困難。本研究以67件參與認證的數位教材研究為資料來源，透過通過率和鑑別力分析，發現多數數位教材品質檢核表有良好的鑑別力。而透過推論力分析發現，數位品質認證的檢核工具有可接受的信度。而數位學習設計廠商在與教學評量、學習策略，以及將教學方法、教學評量和教學目標相搭配等設計面向上遭遇的困難較多。

Conducting certification to e-learning quality has been an international trend. This study introduces the methods of e-learning courseware quality certification adopted by eLearning Quality Certification Center in Taiwan. In addition, an imperial study was implemented to investigate the reliabilities of the certification tools. Difficulties facing by elearning producers and benefits of implementing certification will also be discussed in this paper. In this study, 67 e-learning courseware evaluated by e-Learning Courseware Quality Checklist (eLCQC) were the participants. Based on an analysis of item difficulty and discrimination, the results show that the eLCQC overall has good item discriminations. An analysis of generalizability also indicates that the eLCQC has a fair reliability. In terms of elearning courseware designs, e-learning courseware producers often face difficulties on designing teaching methods, assessments, and learning strategies to be incorporated to instructional goals of the courseware.

1. Anastasi, A.,Urbina, S.(1997).Psychological Testing.New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc..
2. Barbera, E.(2004).Quality in virtual education environments.British Journal of Educational Technology,35,13-20.
3. Barker, K. C.(2007).B-learning quality standards for consumer protection and consumer confidence: A Canadian case study in e-learning quality assurance.Educational Technology & society,10,109-119.
4. Bersin, J.(2007).Enterprise Learning and Talent Management 2007 Trends, Areas of Focus and Predictions for 2007.Oakland, CA:Bersin & Associates.
5. Brennan, R. L.(2001).Generalizability Theory.New York:Springer-Verlag.
6. CEN CWA 15533
7. Ehlers, U. D.,Hildebrandt, B.,Gortz, L.,Pawlowski, J. M.(2005).Use and Distribution of Quality Approaches in European e-learning.Thessaloniki, Greece:CEDEFOP.
8. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 19796-1:2005
9. Pawlowski, J. M.(2007).The quality adaptation model: Adaptation and adoption of the quality standard ISO/IEC 19796-1 for learning, education, and training.Educational Technology & Society,10(2),3-16.
10. Making the grade: Online education in the United States, 2006
11. Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States
12. Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United Slates, 2003 and 2004
13. 2nd International SCIL Congress

1. 陳明裡(2019)。烘焙課程應用團隊合作學習模式之教學成效。萬能學報，41，89-98。
2. 高翎紘、吳政叡(2016)。英語數位資源的學習動機與滿意度之研究：以輔仁大學大學部學生為例。圖資與檔案學刊，89，77-107。
3. 盧秀琴、方慧娟(2017)。「昆蟲學特論」課程培育國小在職教師的科技學科教學知識（TPACK）。科學教育學刊，25(1)，75-96。
4. 盧秀琴、李怡嫻(2016)。「昆蟲學」師培課程培育國小師資生開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具與設計測驗卷。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，9(3)，1-28。
5. 盧秀琴、林毓哲(2018)。國小教師開發「昆蟲桌遊教具」以增強學童「沈浸經驗、科學過程技能」。課程與教學，21(1)，105-131。
6. 袁宇熙,胡宜蓁(2019)。以科技導向數位學習培育大學生餐飲業創業素養之研究。當代教育研究季刊，27(4)，71-114。
7. 莊涵芬、吳玫瑩(2015)。台灣便利商店員工使用數位學習平台的學習成效之研究。Journal Of Data Analysis，10(6)，27-49。
8. (2024)。建構博物館與美術館導覽行動應用程式評量規準表之研究。國際數位媒體設計學刊，16(1)，23-48。