题名

應用HQKMS-DMAIC方法論建立醫療品質指標管理機制

并列篇名

Application of HQKMS-DMAIC Methodology for Establishing a Mechanism of Medical Quality Management

DOI

10.6188/JEB.201912_21(2).0001

作者

鄭雅穗(Ya-Suey Cheng);盧以詮(Yi-Chuan Lu);鄭雅文(Ya-Wen Cheng);李松澤(Sung-Tse Li)

关键词

財務知識管理系統 ; HQKMS-DMAIC方法論 ; 醫療品質指標管理 ; 管制圖 ; FKMS ; HQKMS-DMAIC methodology ; medical quality indicator management ; control chart

期刊名称

電子商務學報

卷期/出版年月

21卷2期(2019 / 12 / 01)

页次

147 - 170

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

醫療品質指標是評值與衡量醫療品質的重要工具,近年來為提升台灣醫療品質,屬台灣的醫療品質指標系統正如火如荼發展中。本文以HQKMS-DMAIC方法論建立醫療品質指標管理機制:「定義」以TCPI要素為基準,整合TCPI、QIP與P4P系統之資料要素;「衡量」以管制圖與同儕資料作為衡量工具;「分析」以落於管制圖+2SD或+3SD之外為判讀規則之標準;「改善」依管制圖判讀規則之標準、指標監測議題之重要性與急迫性決定;「控制」為持續監測、追蹤品質之穩定性。應用HQKMS-DMAIC方法論建立之管理機制,有助落實醫療品質指標監測日常化,不但有助病人安全的保障,改善醫病關係,更可促進醫療品質不斷提升與精進。

英文摘要

Medical quality indicators are keys to evaluate the performance of medical quality. We proposed a "hospital quality knowledge management system" (HQKMS), where the DMAIC methodology was implemented for medical quality management. In the HQKMS-DMAIC process, first in the "Define" phase, all medical quality indicators such as TCPI, QIP and P4P are defined to be the core data sets for quality performance measures. Secondly, in the "Measure" phase, control charts and the measurement unit for benchmark are determined as knowledge sets by professional users. In the "Analyze" phase, the system shows signals where there seems to have significant changes in one of the major indicators, or to have urgent attention or actions taken. Relevant solutions and decisions follow immediately in the "Improve" stage, to help the hospital quality management team achieve the desired objectives. Finally, in the "Control" phase, continuous monitoring and tracking the performance indicators by the HQKMS ensure the service quality and stability.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 張石柱,蕭幸金,陳美惠,王詩鳳(2008)。醫療品質與生產力變動之評估─以台灣醫療品質指標計畫(TQIP)為例。當代會計,9(1),1-32。
    連結:
  2. Chen, S. H.(Ed.),Wang, P. P.(Ed.)(2004).Computational intelligence in economics and finance.Berlin:Springer.
  3. Donabedian, A.(1980).The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment.Ann Arbor, MI:Health Administration Press.
  4. Institute of Medicine(2001).Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century.Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
  5. Lohr, K. N.(Ed.)(1990).Medicare: A strategy for quality assurance.Washington D.C.:National Academy Press.
  6. Lu, Y. C.,Cheng, H.,Sheu, C.(2011).Embedded DMAIC methodology into financial knowledge management system.Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE 2011),Las Vegas, NV, USA:
  7. 沈聖倫(2016)。台灣,桃園,元智大學管理學院。
  8. 許加文(2007)。台灣,桃園,元智大學管理學院。
  9. 衛生福利部(2013)。醫院醫療品質指標-為什麼要篩選醫院醫療品質指標。取自2016 年 1 月 20 日,衛生福利部,健康服務品質政策資訊平台網址 https://hcqm.mohw.gov.tw/cont.php?cid=9d5426d1b31111e29e960800200c9a66