题名

「身歷其境」的行動行銷：遊戲式廣告聯結程度對心理模擬與廣告效果之影響

并列篇名

Get Inside the Game? The Influence of Engagement on Mental Simulations and Advertising Effect of Mobile Advergames

DOI

10.3966/181666012016101202001

作者

留淑芳(Shu-Fang Liu)；許綺芬(Chi-Fen Hsu)

关键词

遊戲式廣告 ； 聯結程度 ； 心理模擬 ； advergames ； engagement ； mental simulations

期刊名称

行銷科學學報

卷期/出版年月

12卷2期（2016 / 10 / 01）

页次

85 - 117

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

智慧型手機的興起，行動行銷（Mobile Marketing）席捲全球，許多店家建立專屬品牌或產品的App，透過互動遊戲的方式將產品訊息傳達給消費者，稱為「遊戲式廣告」（Advergames），身歷其境的臨場感，讓消費者彷彿親身使用或消費該產品，這種消費者與科技載體間的互動，即為本研究所定義的聯結（Engagement）。過往以模擬對象為主題的相關研究，多著重於廣告文字表達或影像圖像視角，鮮少應用於遊戲式廣告中的人物角色模擬，本研究以心理學基礎認知理論（Grounded Cognition Theory）及自我參照理論（Self-reference Theory）為基礎，應用於遊戲式廣告聯結程度所引發的心理模擬（Mental Simulations）及廣告效果，以補足相關研究缺口。本研究透過情境模擬，設計2（遊戲式廣告聯結程度：高聯結/低聯結）×2（模擬對象：第一人稱/第三人稱）×2（先前產品消費經驗：有/ 無）共8 組實驗情境，以197位受測者進行實證。研究結果顯示：(1)高聯結遊戲式廣告有助於過程焦點心理模擬（ProcessorientedMental Simulations）；低聯結則導致較多結果焦點心理模擬（Outcome-focused Mental Simulations）；(2)使用第一人稱（FirstpersonPerspective）模擬對象能產生較佳的心理模擬；(3)聯結程度與模擬對象（Simulation Object）間存在交互作用，高聯結搭配第一人稱的遊戲式廣告效果最佳；(4)心理模擬乃聯結程度與模擬對象對廣告效果的中介變項；(5) 無先前產品消費經驗者，高聯結遊戲式廣告可提升心理模擬及廣告效果；模擬對象則不受先前產品消費經驗所干擾，研究結果可作為廣告實務策略制定參考。
英文摘要

Mobile marketing prevailed over the world because of the smart phone developing in recent years. Lots of stores owner designed exclusive brand and product's App to deliver information to customer by interacting in games, which was called mobile advergames. Getting inside the games makes user feels like that he is involving consumption and using the product. The interaction between consumer and technical carrier was defined as ＂engagement＂ in this study. Most of past studies on simulation object focused on word expression, image and picture of Ad copy, but few studies have dealt with the issues of the simulation of character role in advergames, which are even more dependent on the advertising effect of mobile advergames. This research based on grounded cognition theory and self-reference theory lied for mental simulations of causing by engagement degree of advergames and advertising effect to fill the gaps in existing researches. This study used a 2(engagement degree of advergames: high engagement / low engagement)2(simulation object: the first person perspective / the third person perspective)2(use experience: experienced users / novice) between-subject factorial design and 197 subjects are tested in the empirical process. The results of this study show below: (1) Advergames with high engagement will faciltate the process-oriented mental simulations, and low engagement advergames creates more outcome-focused mental simulations. (2) Utilizing simulation object of first-person perspective in advergames have better mental simulations than third-person perspective. (3) Interaction effect is significant between engagement degree and simulation object of advergames, and the effect is best when high engagement matches first-person perspective in mobile advergames. (4) Mental simulation represents a significant mediator with regard to advertising effect. (5) Advergames with high engagement degree that will facilitate mental simulation and advertising effect if consumers have no pre-experience with product but simulation object does not moderate the influence of engagement degree on mental simulations. Finally, the results can provide strategic establishment of advertising practice with reference.
主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Jones, S. C., & Thom, J. A. (2013). Advergames play with nutrition by making fast food rewarding. The Conversation, 6 December, pp. 1-4
  2. Melodiadorata. (2008). Engagement Advertising : A New Face for the Advertising World.http://expertvoices.nsdl.org/cornellinfo204/2008/03/29/engagement-advertising-a-new-face-for-theadvertising-world/
  3. Achterberg, W.,Pot, A. M.,Kerkstra, A.,Ooms, M.,Muller, M.,Ribbe, M.(2003).The effect of depression on social engagement in newly admitted Dutch nursing home residents.The Gerontologist,43(2),213-218.
  4. Babin, L. A.,Burns, A. C.,Biswas, A.(1992).A framework providing direction for research on communications effects of mental imagery-evoking advertising strategies.Advances in Consumer Research,19(1),621-628.
  5. Barsalou, L. W.(2008).Grounded cognition.Annual Review of Psychology,59,617-645.
  6. Brodie, R. J.,Hollebeek, L. D.,Juric, B.,Ilic, A.(2011).Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research.Journal of Service Research,14(3),252-271.
  7. Chang, C.(2013).Imagery fluency and narrative advertising effects.Journal of Advertising,42(1),54-68.
  8. Chang, W. C.(2012).A Study on Use of User Demand Evaluation in Interactive Interface-Using Virtual Fitting-Room as an Example.World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,6(11),114-118.
  9. Chisholm, J. D.,Chapman, C. S.,Amm, M.,Bischof, W. F.,Smilek, D.,Kingstone, A.(2014).A cognitive ethology study of first- and third-person perspectives.PLoS One,9(3),e92696.
  10. Coyle, J. R.,Thorson, E.(2001).The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites.Journal of Advertising,30(3),65-77.
  11. Debevec, K.,Romeo, J. B.(1992).Self-referent processing in perceptions of verbal and visual commercial information.Journal of Consumer Psychology,1(1),83-102.
  12. Elder, R.S.(2011).Cognition and sensory perception: The effects of advertising and mental simulation on the perceptual consumption experience.Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan.
  13. Elder, R.S.,Krishna(2012).The "visual depiction effect" in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation.Journal of Consumer Research,38(6),988-1003.
  14. Escalas, J. E.(2007).Self Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration.Journal of Consumer Research,33(4),421-429.
  15. Escalas, J. E.(2004).Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion.Journal of Advertising,33(2),37-48.
  16. Escalas, J. E.,Luce, M. F.(2003).Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising.Journal of Consumer Psychology,13(3),246-254.
  17. Etkin, J.,Sela, A.(2015).How Experience Variety Shapes Post-Purchase Product Evaluation.Journal of Marketing Research,52(2)
  18. Fisher, J. C.(2006).Does Simulation Theory Really Involve Simulation?.Philosophical Psychology,19(4),417-432.
  19. Glass, Z.(2007).The effectiveness of product placement in video games.Journal of Interactive Advertising,8(1),23-32.
  20. Glenberg, A. M.(2010).Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,1(4),586-596.
  21. Grigorovici, D. M.,Constantin, C. D.(2004).Experiencing interactive advertising beyond rich media: Impacts of ad type and presence on brand effectiveness in 3D gaming immersive virtual environments.Journal of Interactive Advertising,5(1),22-36.
  22. Hoch, S. J.,Deighton, J.(1989).Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience.Journal of Marketing,53(2),1-20.
  23. Hoch, S. J.,Ha, Y. W.(1986).Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience.Journal of Consumer Research,13(2),221-233.
  24. Hollebeek, L. D.(2011).Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus.Journal of Marketing Management,27(7-8),785-807.
  25. Hung, I. W.,Wyer, R. S., Jr(2009).Differences in perspective and the influence of charitable appeals: When imagining oneself as the victim is not beneficial.Journal of Marketing Research,46(3),421-434.
  26. Kim, K.,Zhang, M.,Li, X.(2008).Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations.Journal of Consumer Research,35(4),706-713.
  27. Kinard, B. R.,Hartman, K. B.(2013).Are You Entertained? The Impact of Brand Integration and Brand Experience in Television-Related Advergames.Journal of Advertising,42(2-3),196-203.
  28. Klein, L. R.(2003).Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence.Journal of Interactive Marketing,17(1),41-55.
  29. Kretchmer, Susan B.(2005).Changing Views of Commercialization in Digital Games: In-Game Advertising and Advergames as Worlds in Play.Digital conference,Vancouver:
  30. Krishna, A.(2012).An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology,22(3),332-351.
  31. Lakoff, G.,Johnson, M.(1980).The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system.Cognitive Science,4(2),195-208.
  32. Lee, M.(2004).Let the Advergames Begin! The Effects of Brand Placement Proximity and Game Involvement on Brand Memory.American academy of advertising conference,LA:
  33. Levin, I. P.,Gaeth, G. J.(1988).How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product.Journal of Consumer Research,15(3),374-78.
  34. Li, H.,Daugherty, T.,Biocca, F.(2001).Feeling the presence of products:Consumer learning from virtual experience.American Marketing Association Winter Educators Conference,Scottsdale:
  35. Lombard, M.,Ditton, T.(1997).At the heart of it all: The concept of presence.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,3(2)
  36. Lukaszewski, W.,Jarczewska-Gerc, E.(2012).Mental simulation and persistence in action.Journal of Russian & East European Psychology,50(3),26-46.
  37. Marks, L. J.,Kamins, M. A.(1988).The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers' Belief Strength, Belief Confidence, and Attitudes.Journal of Marketing Research,25(3),266-281.
  38. McIsaac, H. K.,Eich, E.(2002).Vantage point in episodic memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9(1),146-150.
  39. Meyers-Levy, J.,Peracchio, L. A.(1996).Moderators of the impact of self-reference on persuasion.Journal of Consumer Research,22(4),408-423.
  40. Mondak, J. J.,Hibbing, M. V.,Canache, D.,Seligson, M. A.,Anderson, M. R.(2010).Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior.American Political Science Review,104(1),85-110.
  41. Moulton, S. T.,Kosslyn, S. M.(2009).Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,364(1521),1273-1280.
  42. Nelson, M. R.,Yaros, R. A.,Keum, H.(2006).Examining the influence of telepresence on spectator and player processing of real and fictitious brands in a computer game.Journal of Advertising,35(4),87-99.
  43. Nicovich, S. G.(2005).The effect of involvement on ad judgment in a video game environment: The mediating role of presence.Journal of Interactive Advertising,6(1),29-39.
  44. Peck, J.,Barger, V.,Webb, A.(2013).In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership.Journal of Consumer Psychology,23(2),189-196.
  45. Petrova, P. K.,Cialdini, R. B.(2005).Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals.Journal of Consumer Research,32(3),442-452.
  46. Redondo, I.(2012).The effectiveness of casual advergames on adolescents' brand attitudes.European Journal of Marketing,46(11/12),1671-1688.
  47. Reeves, B.,Nass, C.(1996).How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places.California:CSLI Publications.
  48. Renard, D.(2013).Online promotional games: impact of flow experience on word-of-mouth and personal information sharing.International Business Research,6(9),93-100.
  49. Rice, H. J.,Rubin, D. C.(2009).I can see it both ways : First and third-person visual perspectives at retrieval.Consciousness and cognition,18(4),877-890.
  50. Rodríguez-Ardura, I.,Martínez-López, F. J.(2014).Another look at 'being there'experiences in digital media: Exploring connections of telepresence with mental imagery.Computers in Human Behavior,30,508-518.
  51. Saks, A. M.(2006).Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement.Journal of Managerial Psychology,21(7),600-619.
  52. Sanna, L. J.(2000).Mental Simulation, Affect, and Personality A Conceptual Framework.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(5),168-173.
  53. Schlosser, A. E.(2006).Learning through virtual product experience: The role of imagery on true versus false memories.Journal of Consumer Research,33(3),377-383.
  54. Schlosser, A. E.(2003).Experiencing products in the virtual world: the role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions.Journal of Consumer Research,30(2),184-198.
  55. Schubert, T. W.,Koole, S. L.(2009).The embodied self : Making a fist enhances men's power-related self-conceptions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45(4),828-834.
  56. Sela, A.,Wheeler, S. C.,Sarial-Abi, G.(2012).We are not the same as You and I : Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers' attitudes toward brands.Journal of Consumer Research,39(3),644-661.
  57. Shen, H.,Sengupta, J.(2012).If you can't grab it, it won't grab you: The effect of restricting the dominant hand on target evaluations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48(2),525-529.
  58. Sherman, S. J.,Cialdini, R. B.,Schwartzman, D. F.,Reynolds, K. D.(1985).Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease the mediating effect of ease of imagery.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,11(1),118-127.
  59. Smith, L. B.(2005).Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment.Developmental Review,25(3),278-298.
  60. Song, K.,Fiore, A. M.,Park, J.(2007).Telepresence and fantasy in online apparel shopping experience.Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,11(4),553-570.
  61. Steuer, J.(1992).Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence.Journal of Communication,42(4),73-93.
  62. Sukoco, B. M.,Wu, W. Y.(2011).The effects of advergames on consumer telepresence and attitudes: A comparison of products with search and experience attributes.Expert Systems with Applications,38(6),7396-7406.
  63. Taylor, S. E.,Schneider, S. K.(1989).Coping and the simulation of events.Social Cognition,7(2),174-194.
  64. Terlutter, R.,Capella, M. L.(2013).The gamification of advertising: Analysis and research directions of in-game advertising, advergames, and advertising in social network games.Journal of Advertising,42(2-3),95-112.
  65. Trampe, D.,Stapel, D. A.,Siero, F. W.(2011).The self-activation effect of advertisements: Ads can affect whether and how consumers think about the self.Journal of Consumer Research,37(6),1030-1045.
  66. Trope, Y.,Liberman, N.(2003).Temporal Construal.Psychological Review,110(3),403-421.
  67. Vivek, S. D.,Beatty, S. E.,Morgan, R. M.(2012).Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase.Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,20(2),122-146.
  68. Wang, A.(2006).Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects.Journal of Advertising Research,46(4),355-368.
  69. Wiles, M. A.,Danielova, A.(2009).The worth of product placement in successful films : An event study analysis.Journal of Marketing,73(4),44-63.
  70. Wise, K.,Bolls, P. D.,Kim, H.,Venkataraman, A.,Meyer, R.(2008).Enjoyment of advergames and brand attitudes: The impact of thematic relevance.Journal of Interactive Advertising,9(1),27-36.
  71. Yang, M.,Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R.,Dinu, L.,Arpan, L. M.(2006).The Effectiveness of "in-Game" Advertising: Comparing College Students' Explicit and Implicit Memory for Brand Names.Journal of Advertising,35(4),143-152.
  72. Zaichkowsky, J. L.(1994).The personal involvement inventory : Reduction, revision, and application to advertising.Journal of advertising,23(4),59-70.
  73. Zhao, M.,Hoeffler, S.,Dahl, D. W.(2012).Imagination difficulty and new product evaluation.Journal of Product Innovation Management,29(S1),76-90.
  74. Zhao, M.,Hoeffler, S.,Zauberman, G.(2011).Mental simulation and product evaluation: The affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation.Journal of Marketing Research,48(5),827-839.
  75. 方昇鴻(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學傳播研究所。
  76. 陳桂玲(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學管理研究所在職專班。
  77. 劉晉德(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立成功大學電機工程學系碩博士班。
被引用次数
  1. 廖冠聿,周軒逸(2021)。第一或第三人稱視角：業配文圖片視角對於消費者產品態度與購買意願之影響。資訊管理學報，28(3)，247-280。
print cancel