题名

運用情境模擬教學提升加護病房護理人員身體評估之能力

并列篇名

The Use of Simulation Teaching to Improve Physical Assessmant Ability of Nursing Staff in Intenslve Care Unit

作者

林佳蓉(Chia-Jung Lin);郭嘉竹(Chia-Chu Kuo);許瑋玲(Wei-Ling Hsu);侯怡吟(Yi-Yin Hou);吳貞蓉(Chen-Jung Wu)

关键词

情境模擬 ; 加護病房 ; 身體評估能力 ; Simulation Teaching ; Intensive Care Unit ; Physical Assessment Ability

期刊名称

嘉基護理

卷期/出版年月

20卷2期(2020 / 12 / 01)

页次

17 - 29

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

加護病房病人疾病複雜度高且易有突發狀況,護理人員需要具備足夠的身體評估實務與應變能力;故本專案經現況資料收集,發現護理人員執行身體評估正確率為50.38%及認知正確率為67.25%;主要原因為:1.缺乏相關在職教育課程;2.身體評估認知及操作技能不足;3.未有身體評估稽核制度。本專案的目的欲提升加護病房護理人員身體評估能力及認知正確率達80%;改善方案:運用多元教學及情境模擬教學、制定稽核制度,經後測身體評估正確率及認知率皆達閾值。本專案運用多元策略方式導入情境模擬教學,確實可提升加護病房護理人員身體評估能力,故持續將改善方案推展於臨床實務中,以提升病人安全及專業的照護品質。

英文摘要

The situation of patients in intensive care unit is complicated and tending to change easily. So the nursing personnel need to have adequate cognition and adapt ability during physical evaluation. This study has collected data of present nursing condition , noting that the nurses have 50.38% about the accuracy rate of physical assessment and 67.25% about cognizance scores. The main causes are 1. lack of in-service education. 2. inadequate cognition and practicing skill. 3.lack of checking system about physical assessment. This study aims at elevating the accuracy rate and cognizance scores of physical assessment for intensive care unit nursing personnel to 80%. The methods include: Using diversified teaching and situation simulation, setting a monitor system, posttest the accuracy rate and cognizance scores achieve the threshold. This study is situation simulation teaching as pivot, ability of intensive care unit nursing personnel elevate at physical assessment actually. So, the above-mentioned methods will be practiced at clinical nursing service to promote safety and profession care for the patients.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 林育如,林雯萱,王敏芳,葉淑敏,徐紫娟,張玉婷(2019)。提升透析電子護理記錄完整性之專案。護理雜誌,66(1),93-100。
    連結:
  2. 林惠玉,李依玲,陳瑾樺,李世凱(2018)。精神專科醫院護理人員身體評估能力之改善專案。精神衛生護理雜誌,13(2),39-49。
    連結:
  3. 邱淑芬,蘇秀娟,劉桂芬,黃慧芬(2015)。翻轉教室-資訊科技融入護理教育的新教學策略。護理雜誌,62(3),5-10。
    連結:
  4. 范姜玉珍,顏雅卉,陳淑雯(2019)。護理指導資訊化輔助降低導尿管及非導管之泌尿道感染率之改善專案。護理雜誌,66(2),77-84。
    連結:
  5. 張雅玲,黃惠玲,林雅玲,陳秀琍,翁淑媛,郭秋雅,陳怡呈(2017)。運用多元策略提升護理人員執行疼痛評估正確率之專案。長庚護理,28(1),47-58。
    連結:
  6. Munshi, F.,Lababidi, H.,Alyousef, S.(2015).Low-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences,10(1),12-15.
  7. Rousseau, M.,Könings, K. D.,Touchie, C.(2018).Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design.BMC Medical Education,18(1),302-302.
  8. Tokunaga, J.,Takamura, N.,Ogata, K.,Setoguchi, N.,Sato, K.(2016).Physical assessment education using various simulators.Yakugaku Zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan,136(7),981.
  9. Xie, A.,Carayon, P.(2015).A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE) based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.Ergonomics,58(1),33.
  10. Zambas, S. I.,Smythe, E. A.,Koziol-Mclain, J.(2016).The consequences of using advanced physical assessment skills in medical and surgical nursing: A hermeneutic pragmatic study.International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being,11(1),32090.
  11. 吳佩樺,陳茹芳,翁于晴,張蕙瀅,洪瑞鎂(2017)。淺談台澳護理教育之情境模擬教學:以澳洲中央昆士蘭大學及長庚科技大學為例。長庚科技學刊,27,87-95。
  12. 李書芬,郭梅珍(2014)。身體檢查與評估技術影音教學光碟與手冊之製作與應用。耕莘學報,12,5-14。
  13. 李國箴,張菁惠,紀政儀,張雅雯,林雅玟,蘇曇紅,呂淑華(2016).健康問題與護理評估-OSCE 之應用.台北市:華杏.
  14. 沈季香,吳美幸,劉怡,武香君(2014)。提升胸腔內科病房護理人員執行呼吸系統評估之正確率。醫院雙月刊,47(3),48-60。
  15. 林嘉玲,林君萍,蘇美禎,張媚(2014)。情境模擬教學在護理教育。台灣醫學,18(2),238-243。
  16. 邱豔芬(2014).身體評估護理上之應用.台北市:華杏.
  17. 唐景俠,黃秀雲,吳孟凌,宋寧娟,盤松青,李德芬,藍淑菁(2018).急重症護理學.台北市:華杏.
  18. 財團法人醫院評鑑醫療品質策進會(2019)‧108 年醫院評鑑基準 ‧ 取自https://www.jct.org.tw/dl-4233-7feb3ec35e144917a98676c79f47 e419.html
  19. 陳夏蓮,黃采薇,劉千琪、李薇莉(2014)。情境模擬教學與學習理論於護理教育之應用。榮總護理,31(3),220-225。
  20. 陳翠芳,林靜幸,周碧玲,藍菊梅,徐惠禎,陳瑞娥,王采芷(2018).身體檢查與評估指引.新北市:新文京.
  21. 童麗錡,張麗君(2017)。情境模擬訓練對護理人員同理心之成效。台灣擬真醫學教育期刊,4(1),12-23。
  22. 黃淑芸,陳夏蓮,胡庭禎(2012)。探討加護病房護理人員應具備之臨床能力。榮總護理,29(3),243-254。