大學生休閒興趣量表編製之建構與驗證

Construction and Confirmation of the Measure Instrument of Leisure Interest of University Students

10.7037/JNTUE.200706.0053

吳明蒼(Ming-Tsang Wu)

休閒興趣量表 ； 驗證 ； 大學生 ； 休閒興趣模式 ； Instrument of leisure interest ； Confirmation ； University student ； Model of leisure interest

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

21卷1期（2007 / 06 / 01）

53 - 73

繁體中文

本研究旨在以Beard與Ragheb發展之休閒興趣量表爲基礎，建構大學生休閒興趣量表，並驗證其適配度。本研究以日間部大學生爲研究對象，共進行兩次問卷調查，以隨機取樣方式，各發出問卷450份，分別回收有效問卷380份以及391份，有效問卷回收率分別是84.%與86.9%，問卷回收資料經由項目分析、信度測試、探索性因素分析及驗證性因素分析，共萃取六個因素，計有服務、戶外、文化藝術、體能、機械、社交等六個構面，保留二十三個測量題項，而量表各層面之α係數均高於70，全量表之α係數甚至達80以上，顯示其內部一致性佳。至於驗證模式經修改後，該模式適配度經驗證性因素分析，結果顯示其適配度良好。

The purpose of this study was to construct the measure instrument of leisure interest of university students and to confirm the fit of the instrument, which were based on the Leisure Interest Measure (LIM) developed by Beard and Ragheb. The population of this study was university students of the day division, and surveys were conducted during two different periods of time by random sample selection. Four hundred and fifty survey instruments were distributed during each period, and the number of effective instrument were 380 and 391, for an effective rate of 84.8% and 86.9% respectively. The data collected were analyzed by item analysis, reliability estimation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Six factors were extracted from the results, including service domain, outdoor domain, cultural and artistic domain, fitness domain, mechanical domain, and social dimension; twenty-three items in the LIM were retained. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the entire instrument was significantly greater than.80, and in each dimension greater than. 70. Thus, high internal consistency of the survey instrument was revealed. In addition, after modification of the confirmation model, results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the good fit of the model was demonstrated.

1. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
2. Cattell, R. B.(1966).The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research,1,245-276.
3. Cordes, K. A.,Ibrahim, H. M.(1999).Applications in recreation and leisure for today and the future.Boston:McGraw-Hill.
4. Cronbach, L. J.(1951).Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika,16,297-334.
5. Devellis, R. F.(1991).Scale development: Theory and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6. Fink, B.,Wild, K.(1995).Similarities in leisure interests: Effects of selection and socialization in friendships.Journal of Social Psychology,135(4),471-482.
7. Fornell, C.,Locker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
8. Hendel, D. D.,Harrold, R. D.(2004).Undergraduate student leisure interests over three decades.College Student Journal,38(4),557-568.
9. Huang, C. Y.(2003).TX,University of the Incarnate Word.
10. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
11. Kelly J. R.,Valeria, J. F.(1999).21st century leisure: Current issues.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
12. Kraut, A. I.,A. I. Kraut (Ed)(1996).Organizational survey: Tool for assessment and change.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
13. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
14. Pilgrim-Hector, J.(2005).NY,Touro College.
15. Ragheb M. G.,Beard J. G.(1993).Idyll Arbor leisure battery.Enumclaw, WA:Idyll Arbor.
16. Scott, D.,Willits, F. K.(1998).Adolescent and adult leisure patterns: A reassessment.National Recreation and Park Association,30(3),319-330.
17. Sorebo, O.,Christensen G. E.,Eikebrokk T. R.(2004).The impact of purposeful end-user computing activities on job performance: An empirical investigation.Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology,36(2),111-124.
18. Thompson, S.,Grant, B.,Dharmalingam, A.(2002).Leisure time in midlife: What are the odds?.Leisure Studies,21,125-143.
19. Trottier, A. N.,Brown, G. T.,Hobson, S. J. G.,Miller W.(2002).Reliability and validity of the Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS-short form) and the Adolescent Leisure Interest Profile (ALIP).Occupational Therapy International,9(2),131-144.
20. Vondracek, F. W.,Skorikov, V. B.(1997).Leisure, school, and work activity preferences and their role in vocational identity development.Career Development Quarterly,45(4),322-340.
21. 吳萬益、林清河(2001)。企業研究方法。台北市:華泰。
22. 邱政皓(2004)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北市:雙葉。

1. 張瑋珊(2017)。臺灣一般釋迦與鳳梨釋迦之消費行為研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2017。1-149。