國民中學教師所秉持學校組織變革意識型態之調查研究

The Investigative Study of Ideology of Teachers for Organizational Change in Junior High Schools

10.7037/JNTUE.200712.0001

黃乃熒(Nai-Ying Whang)

國民中學 ； 教師 ； 學校組織變革意識型態 ； Junior High Schools ； Teacher ； Ideology of Organizational Change in Schools

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

21卷2期（2007 / 12 / 01）

1 - 28

繁體中文

本文旨在探索國民中學教師所秉持學校組織變革意識型態的狀況。學校組織變革係指新理念的採用，會透過意識型態爲媒介，進而影響變革執行的行動。而學校組織變革意識型態，係指在學校組織變革中，個體回應權力階級所形的價值體系，會由教師對於工作的認知加以呈現，且分爲正面與負面兩個向度；正面意識型態對於變革執行投入有正面的影響，反之亦然。加上學校背景，包括教師之性別、學歷、職位、年資，以及他們所教學之所在地、學校規模等等，會影響其所秉持之學校組織變革意識型態，有必要深入探索，以利建立有效的學校組織變革執行條件。爲了達到本研究目的，本研究採用調查研究法，並在全臺灣地區719所國民中學，以分層隨機取樣抽取105所學校教師爲樣本，共寄出2500份問卷，有效回收問卷爲1280，有效回收率爲53%，並以單因子變異數分析進行統計處理，並加以討論，據以提出結論與建議。

The study is to explore the quo status of ideology of teachers for organizational change in junior high schools. In fact, organizational change in schools is the adoption of a new idea by an organization. And ideology refers to a set of closely related ideas. Therefore, ideology, as its medium, will influence the implementation of organizational change in schools. In general, ideology of organizational change in schools is defined as the process and product of forming value systems. And it can appear in individual's cognition of work Ideology involves positive and negative conceptual systems. And the background of a school includes sex, degree, and position, and age of teachers, and area, and scale of teachers of their teaching environoment, which will cause different influences in implementation of organizational change in schools. In order to facilitate positive ideology of organizational change in schools, the six issues of background in schools must be measured. Therefore the study uses the questionnaire method to collect data, choosing 105 out of 719 junior schools, through a stratified random sampling approach, as samples; of 2500 questionnaires sent out, 1280 teachers completed ones were obtained and studied. The One-Way ANOVA was then used to test research problems.

1. 林純雯(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺灣師範大學。
   連結：
2. Alexander, H. A.(2005).Education in ideology.Journal of Moral Education,34(1),1-18.
3. Bawn, K.(1999).Constructing "Us": Ideology, coalition politics, and false consciousness.American Journal of Political Science,43(2),303-334.
4. Beauchamp, G.,H. A. Giroux,A.N. Penna,W. F. Pinar(Eds.)(1981).Curriculum & instruction: Alternative in education.Berkerley, CA:McCutchan.
5. Beyer, J. M.,P. C. Nystrom,W. H. Starbuck (Eds.)(1981).Handbook of organizational Design: II.New York:Oxford University Press.
6. Boudon, R.(1989).The analysis of ideology.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
7. Boyce, M. E.(1995).Solidarity and praxis: Being a change agent in a university setting.Journal of Organizational Change Management,8(6),58-67.
8. Calinescu, M.(1987).Five faces of modernity.CA:Duke University Press.
9. Coobs, G.,S. Bacharach(Ed.)(1992).Research in the sociology of organization: V10.London:Jaipres.
10. Daft, R.(1989).Organization theory and design.New York:West Publishing Company.
11. Day, M. T.(1998).Transformational discourse: Ideologies of organizational Change in the academic library.Library Trnds,46(4),635-668.
12. Deem, R.,Brehony, K. J.(2005).Management as ideology: The case of `New managerialism` in higher education.Oxford Review of Education,31(2),217-235.
13. Derrida, J.(1978).Writing and difference.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
14. Dickerson, D. B.,Kouzmin, A.,Korac-Kakabadse, N.(2006).Taking Ideology out of ethics: From failed business strategies to new cross-cultural Platforms.Baltic Journal of Management,1(3),285-299.
15. Eaglteon, T.(1991).Ideology.London:Verso.
16. Finlayson, J. G.(2003).The theory of ideology and the ideology of theory: Habermas Contra Adorno.Historical Materialism,11(2),165-187.
17. Foucault, M.(1997).Ethics: Subjectivity and truth.New York:The New Press.
18. Fullan, M. G.(1991).The new meaning of educational change.New York:Teacher College, Columbia University Press.
19. Giroux, H. A.,A. N. Penna,W. F. Pinar (Eds.)(1981).Curriculum & Instruction.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
20. Hamilton, M. B.(1987).The elements of the concept of ideology.Political Studies,X(xxv),18-38.
21. Hartsock, N. C. M.(1998).The feminist standpoint revisited & other essays.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
22. Larrain, J.(1979).The concept of ideology.London:Hutchinson.
23. Leonardo, Z.(2003).Discourse and critique: Outlines of a post-structural theory of ideology.Journal of Education Policy,18(2),203-214.
24. McKinley, W.,Mone, M.,Barker, V.(1998).Some ideological foundations of organizational downsizing.Journal of Management Inquiry,7(3),198-212.
25. McLaren, P.,Martin, G.,Farahmandpur, R.,Jaramillo, N.(2004).Teaching in and against the empire: Critical pedagogy as revolutionary praxis.Teacher Education Quarterly,31(1),131-151.
26. Mullins, W. A.(1979).Truth and ideology: Reflections on Mannheim`s paradox.History & Theory,18(2),141-154.
27. Nomore, A. H.(2004).The edge of chaos: School administrators and accountability.Journal of Educational Administration,42(1),55-77.
28. Plamenatz, J.(1970).Ideology.London:Pall Mall.
29. Ricoeur, P.(1986).Lectures on ideology and utopia.New York:Columbia University Press.
30. Rust-Elmhurst, K. G.,McKinely, W.,Moon, G.,Edwards, J. C.(2005).Ideological foundations of perceived contract breach associated with downsizing: An empirical investigation.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,12(1),37-51.
31. Smith, H. R.,Carroll, A. B.(1984).Organizational ethics: A stacked deck.Journal of Business Ethics,3,95-100.
32. Smith, M. W.,Smagorinsky, P.(2002).Ideology and education.Research in the Teaching of English,37(2),141-144.
33. Thompson, J. B.(1984).Study in the theory of ideology.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
34. Tom, A.(1997).The deliberate relationship: A frame for talking about faculty-student relationship.Albrta Journal of Educational Research,63,192-206.
35. Van Dijk, T. A.(1998).Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.London:Sage.
36. Virgilo, S. J.,Virgilo, I. R.(2001).The role of the principal in curriculum implementation.Education,104(4),346-350.
37. Wallis, B.(2006).The politics and ideology of intellectual property.Consumer Policy Review,16(3),117-122.
38. Watson, G. W.(2003).Ideology and the symbolic construction of fairness in organizational change.Journal of Organizational Change and Management,16(2),154-168.
39. Watt, J.(1994).Ideology, objectivity, and education.New York:Teacher College Press.
40. Williams, H.(1988).Concepts of ideology.New York:ST. Martin`s Press.
41. 周柏廷(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺灣師範大學。
42. 陳文團(1999)。意識形態教育的貧困。臺北:師大書苑。
43. 黃乃熒(2001)。行政院國科會專案報告行政院國科會專案報告,未出版
44. 黃乃熒(1998)。行政院國科會專案報告行政院國科會專案報告,未出版
45. 黃乃熒(2004)。行政院國科會專案報告行政院國科會專案報告,未出版
46. 謝馥宇(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺灣師範大學。

1. 陳殷哲、莊婷琍(2013)。學前教育組織推動組織變革型態與教職員工作滿意度之研究。學校行政，85，118-136。
2. 陳芝筠(2009)。試論學校組織變革對學校評鑑之啟示。學校行政雙月刊，60，63-77。
3. 林世元、呂錘卿(2012)。國民小學校長教學視導之微觀政治分析：從控制到增能賦權。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，26(1)，1-29。
4. 湯誌龍、孫建行(2009)。高中職教師對教育部公文知覺分析—以兼代課鐘點支給函爲例。人文社會科學研究，3(2)，69-90。
5. 蕭建華、閔郁晴(2018)。以微觀政治視角觀高中優質化輔助方案帶動學校之發展變化。中等教育，69(1)，44-60。
6. 鄭彩鳳、鄭玉菁(2014)。校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢關係之研究。當代教育研究季刊，22(1)，1-46。
7. (2017)。臺中市國民中小學校務評鑑後設分析。教育行政與評鑑學刊，21，43-74。