分數表示式對等比例概念建構影響之研究

The Influence of Fractional Expression on Conceptual Construction of Proportion

10.7037/JNTUE.201006.0027

陳蕙茹(Hui-Ju Chen)；柳賢(Shian Leou)

比值 ； 分數表示式 ； 等比例 ； Ratio ； Fractional Expression ； Proportion

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

24卷1期（2010 / 06 / 01）

27 - 47

繁體中文

等比例之分數型式「a/b=c/d」，容易造成學生對等比例與等值分數的混淆。雖然，關於分數與比例的研究很多，卻顯少探討到此混淆所造成的影響。故本研究透過個案的研究來探討等比例之分數表示式對等比例概念建構的影響。本研究個案在解題表現中除了比例問題外，在計算題與對等問題中皆正確解答。經研究後所得結論爲：（一）受試者對分式等式「a/b=c/d」與比例式「x:y=a:b」的符號角色產生混合，造成比例推理時同時並存絕對性關係的思考與相對性關係的思考。（二）由於「a/b=c/d」之型式，使得受試者以分數概念的「商」和「部分－全體」來思考「比值」概念，而將「比的等價」與「分數的等價」產生混合，因而忽略比是意指兩量比較關係之意義。最後研究者根據結論提出相關建議。

A fractional expression of the proportion makes students confuse equal fractions with equal ratios. Although lots of proportional and fractional researches were found, few papers concerned the influence from their confusion. The purpose of this study is to inquire the influence of fractional expression on conceptual construction of the proportion. The subject, whose performance in calculating problems and equivalence problems were good, failed in solving ratio problems in the task. Two conclusions were found in this study: (Ⅰ) because of the mixed role of the equivalent expression ”x/y=a/b” with the proportional one ”x:y=a:b”, both relative thinking and absolute thinking were presented simultaneously when the subject reasoning proportionally; (Ⅱ) the expression ”a/b=c/d” makes the subject interpreted the concept of rate with ”quotient” and ”part-whole” fraction, so that they got confused equal fractions with equal ratios and neglected what the ratio means is to compare two quantities. Finally, some suggestions resulted from this study are proposed for mathematical teaching and future studies.

1. Kieren, T. (1983). The five faces of mathematical knowledge building. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Education, University of Alberta, Edmonoton
2. Freudenthal, H.(1983).Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures.Dordrecht:D.Reidel.
3. Friedlander, A.,Fitzgerald , W.,Lappan, G.(1984).The growth of similarity concepts at the sixth grade level.Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of PMENA,Madison:
4. Hewitt, D.(1999).Arbitrary and necessary, Part: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum.For the learning of Mathematics,19(3),2-9.
5. Karplus, R.,Pulos, S.,Stage, E. K.(1981).Proportional reasoning of early adolescents: Comparison and missing value problem in three schools.Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Grenoble:
6. Lamon, S. J.(2007).Ratoinal Numbers And Proportional Reasoing: Toward a Theoresical Framework for Research.Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
7. Lamon, S. J.(1994).Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming.The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics,Albany, NY:
8. Lamon, S. J.(1999).Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
9. Lesh, R.,Post, T. R.,Berhr, M.(1991).Proportional Reasoning.Number concepts and operations in the middle grades,Reston, VA:
10. Levin, S. W.(1999).Fractions and Division: Research Conceptualizations, Textbook Presentations, and Student Performances.Abstract in Dissertation Abstracts International,59,1089A.
11. Lunzer, E. A.(1973).Formal reasoning: A re-appraisal.London:PMEW, Chelsea College.
12. Mason, J.,Johnston-Wilder, S.(2004).Fundamental Constructs in Mathematics Education.London:RoutledgeFalmer.
13. Noelting, G.(1980).The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part I-Differentiation of stages.Educational Studies In Mathematics,11,217-253.
14. Noelting, G.(1980).The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part II-Problem structure at successive stages; problem solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring.Educational Studies in Mathematics,11,331-363.
15. Noelting, G.(1978).The development of four mathematical concepts in the child and adolescent: ratio, fraction, chance and geometric projection.Meeting of the Canadian Association for Mathematical Education,Kingston, Ontario:
16. Schwarz, J. L.(1987).Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations.Number concepts and operations in the middle grades,Reston, VA:
17. Vergnaud, G.,Lesh,R.(1983).Multiplicative Structures.Acquisitionof Mathematics Concepts and Processes
18. Weinberg, S. L.(2002).Proportional Reasoning: One Problem, Many Solutions!.Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook
19. 林福來(1989)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
20. 林福來(1986)。比例推理能力的研究。認知與學習第一次研討會專集
21. 林福來、郭汾派、林光賢(1985)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
22. 南一書局(2007)。國民中學數學課本第二冊。臺南市:南一書局企業股份有限公司。
23. 馬秀蘭(2005)。多重式比例問題的解題分析：相等比值或相等比率。科學教育研究與發展，41
24. 康軒文(2007)。國民中學數學課本第二冊。臺北縣:康軒文教事業股份有限公司。
25. 張育萍、劉祥通(2003)。一位國小五年級學生對比值問題的解題表現。科學教育研究與發展，39
26. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北:教育部。
27. 陳竹村編、林淑君編、陳俊瑜編。國小數學教材分析－比（含線段圖）。教育研究院籌備處。
28. 陳建州(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學數學教育研究所。
29. 甯自強(1996)。數學的格式與內容—皮亞傑對維高斯基。「皮亞傑及維高斯基對話」百年校慶學術研討會
30. 葉建德、劉祥通(2005)。一位七年級學生的比率構念—從解速率問題表現的觀點。科學教育月刊，279，2-20。
31. 劉祥通(2007)。分數與比例問題解題分析：從數學提問教學的觀點。臺北:師大書苑。
32. 燕曉東譯、歐幾里得(2005)。幾何原本（13卷視圖全本）。人民日報出版社。
33. 翰林出版(2007)。國民中學數學課本第二冊。臺南市:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。