私立課後照顧機構教師轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能關係之研究：中介效果模式驗證

A Study on the Relationships among After-school Teachers' Transformational Leadership, Classroom Management Strategy, and Classroom Management Effectiveness: A Test of the Mediated-effects Model

曾榮祥(Jung-Hsiang Tseng)；張家瑜(Chia-Yu Chang)

課後照顧 ； 教師轉化領導 ； 班級經營策略 ； 班級經營效能 ； 結構方程模式 ； After-School Child Care ； Teachers' Transformational Leadership ； Classroom Management Strategy ； Classroom Management Effectiveness ； Structural Equation Modeling

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

27卷2期（2013 / 12 / 01）

77 - 104

繁體中文

本研究根據相關文獻與實證研究，建構一個理論模型，納入私立課後照顧機構教師之轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能等變項，藉以探究私立課後照顧機構教師轉化領導模式。研究對象採取調查研究法，自編「私立課後照顧機構教師班級領導行為描述問卷」，以北部地區就讀於私立課後照顧機構的學童為研究的施測對象，依據研究目的，以t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關及結構方程模式等統計方法，檢驗本研究之相關假設與理論模式。研究結果有七項發現：一、課後照顧教師轉化領導行為最常運用的是「激勵」，最少運用的是「個別化關懷」；二、課後照顧教師班級經營略以「學習輔導策略」最常運用，「人際關係策略」最少運用；三、課後照顧教師班級經營效能以「教師教學品質」最高，「生活適應成效」最低；四、不同性別之學童知覺教師轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與效能皆無顯著差異；五、中年級課後照顧學童知覺教師轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能皆高於高年級學童；六、課後照顧教師轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能等三者具有正相關存在；七、課後照顧教師轉化領導行為會透過班級經營策略的中介作用間接影響班級經營效能，且屬於完全中介效果。

The main purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between after-school teachers' transformational leadership, classroom management strategy, and classroom management effectiveness. The study employed questionnaire survey method to gather the research data. The major instrument ”The Description Questionnaire of the After-school Teachers' Class Leadership” was designed to collect data. A sample of children of the afterschool child care centers in Northern Taiwan was generated and returned data were analyzed through t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling.The results were summarized as follows: 1. The after-school teachers often used inspiration, but they seldom used individualized consideration. 2. The after-school teachers often used study consulting strategy, but they seldom used interpersonal consulting strategy. 3. The teaching-quality effectiveness revealed to have the best outcome, and the Life-adaption effectiveness revealed to have the lowest outcome. 4. There was no significant differences among the sex of children for their after-school teachers' transformational leadership, classroom management strategy, and classroom management effectiveness. 5. Significant differences existed among the grade of children for teachers' after-school teachers' transformational leadership and classroom management strategy. 6. There was significant relationship among after-school teachers' transformational leadership, classroom management strategy and classroom management effectiveness. 7. Also, the classroom strategy had the significant mediated effects on after-school teacher transformational leadership and classroom management effectiveness.

1. 何宗岳(2009)。國小教師之教師信念、領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能之結構關係研究。臺中教育大學學報，23(1)，99-127。
   連結：
2. 曾榮祥(2011)。課後托育教師轉化與互易領導影響班級經營效能之研究：以班級氣氛為中介之衡量。明新學報，37(1)，231-248。
   連結：
3. 潘世尊(2012)。幼保系課後托育模組課程之改善：一個教師的反省性探究。教育理論與實踐學刊，25，115-151。
   連結：
4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evalution of structure equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
5. Bass, B. M.(1985).Leadership and performance beyond expection.New York, NY:Free Press.
6. Baumgatner, H.,Honburg, C.(1996).Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review.International Journal of Reserch in Marketing,13,139-161.
7. Bolkan, S.,Goodboy, A. K.(2009).Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility.Journal of Instructional Psychology,36,296-306.
8. Bolkan, S.,Goodboy, A. K.,Griffin, D. J.(2011).Teacher leadership and intellectual stimulation: Improving students' approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation.Communication Research Reports,28(4),337-346.
9. Bosch, K, A.(2006).Planning classroom management: A five-step process to creating a positive learning environment.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
10. Burns, J. M.(1978).Leadership.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
11. Chin, J. M.(2007).Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA.Asia Pacific Education Review,8(2),166-177.
12. Ding, L.,Velicer, W.,Harlow, L.(1995).Effect of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices.Structural Equation Modeling,2,119-143.
13. Evertson, C. M.,Emmer, E. T.,Clements, B. S.,Worsham, M. E.(1994).Classroom management for elementary teachers.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
14. Grolnick, W. S.,Farkas, M. S.,Sohmer, R.,Michaels, S.,Valsiner, J.(2007).Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,28(4),332-344.
15. Hayduk, L. A.(1987).Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
17. Jarvenpaa, S. L.,Tractinsky, N.,Vitale, M.(2000).Consumer trust in an internet store.Information Technology and Management,1,45-71.
18. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
19. Mathieu, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2006).Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior.Journal of Organization Behavior,27,1031-1056.
20. Mills, B. C.,Cooke, E.(1983).Extended day programs: A place for the latchkey child.Early Child Development and Care,12,143-151.
21. Mulaik, S. A.,James, L. R.,Van Alstine, J.,Bennett, N.,Lind, S. Y.,Stilwell, C. D.(1989).Evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin,105,430-445.
22. Murray, C.(2002).Supportive teacher-student relationships: Promoting the social and emotional health of early adolescents with high incidence disabilities.Childhood Education,78,285-290.
23. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
24. Pounder, J. S.(2008).Transformational leadership: Practicing what we teach in the management classroom.Journal of Education for Business,84(1),2-6.
25. Powell, D. R.,Widdows, R.(1987).Social and economic factors associated with parents' decision about after-school care: An exploratory study in a medium-sized community.Child and Youth Care Forum,16(4),272-282.
26. Sobel, M. E.(1987).Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models.Sociological Methods and Research,16,155-176.
27. Yukl, G.(2010).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
28. Zepeda, S. J.,Mayers, R. S.,Benson, B. N.(2003).The call to teacher leadership.Larchmont, NY:Eye On Education.
29. 王淑麗(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學。
30. 吳明芳(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院。
31. 吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
32. 吳明隆(2006)。班級經營：理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
33. 呂美芳(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，中華大學。
34. 李新民(2002)。美國課後輔導方案對國內課後托育的啟示。高雄師大學報，13，235-256。
35. 周新富(2002)。幼兒班級經營。臺北市:華騰文化。
36. 林美惠、郭秋勳(2006)。教師轉型領導對大學生學習動機及學業表現影響之個案研究。明道學術論壇，2(1)，45-64。
37. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
38. 邱錦堂(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學。
39. 馬祖琳、陳蓓薇、陳淑華、蘇怡萍、謝惠如(2000)。課後托育機構服務內容之個案研究。醫護科技學刊，2(1)，1-11。
40. 郭明德(2001)。班級經營─理論、實務、策略與研究。臺北市:五南。
41. 陳木金(2006)。從班級經營策略對教學效能影響看師資培育的實務取向。教育研究與發展期刊，2(1)，33-62。
42. 曾榮祥、吳貞宜(2004)。課後托育理論與實務。臺北市:華騰文化。
43. 廖英昭(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
44. 蔡承宏(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北巿立體育學院。
45. 蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學：理論、實務與研究。高雄市:復文。
46. 鄭友超、呂淑娟、林宏旻(2008)。高職（中）導師於M 型社會中班級經營策略之探討。工業教育與技術學刊，34，53-64。

1. 曾榮祥、彭欣敏、常雅珍(2017)。運用平衡計分卡建構課後照顧機構服務品質指標：模糊德菲法分析。教育學誌，37，63-111。
2. 黃詩媛、曾榮祥、常雅珍、余毓琦(2015)。兒童課後照顧教師運用班級團體動力之困境與可行策略探究。人文社會科學研究，9(2)，121-144。