大學生知識信念量表之複核效度考驗與相關研究

An Evaluation of the Cross-Validation and Related Study of the College Students’ Epistemological Beliefs Scale

凃金堂(Chin-Tang Tu)

知識信念 ； 複核效度 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； Epistemological Beliefs ； Cross-Validation ； Confirmatory Factor Analysis

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

30卷1期（2016 / 06 / 01）

1 - 25

繁體中文

本研究採用陳品華(2011)《大學生學科為主的知識與學習信念、自我調整學習之關係研究》的資料，以Schommer (1990)知識信念理論為架構，先進行「大學生知識信念量表」的驗證性因素分析，接續進行複核效度考驗，最後再進行信度考驗。研究結果發現，大學生知識信念量表的四因素：天生能力、快速學習、簡單知識與確定知識，獲得實證資料支持。複核效度考驗發現，大學生知識信念量表的四個因素模式，同時適用估計樣本與效度樣本，顯示本量表具有適切的建構效度。大學生知識信念量表的Cronbach's α係數分別為.77、.74、.68、.76，12題總量表Cronbach's α係數為.78，顯示本量表具良好信度。最後，依據本研究結果，提出實務應用及未來研究上的建議。

Based on Schommer (1990) epistemological beliefs theory, we applied Pin-hwa Chen (2011) ＂Discipline-focused Beliefs about Knowledge and Learning, and Self-regulated Learning of College Students＂ data to conduct firstly the confirmatory factor analysis, and then the crossvalidation test, and lastly the reliability test of the college students' Epistemological Beliefs Scale (EBS). The results of the study showed that the four factors of the EBS: fixed ability, quick learning, simple knowledge, and certain knowledge supported by the confirmatory factor analysis. The results of cross-validation test revealed that the four factor model of the EBS could both apply to calibration and validation sample. The Cronbach's α of the EBS were .77, .74, .68, .76, and .78 for total score. This showed the EBS has good reliability. Finally, based on the study, suggestions for practical applications and future research are proposed.

1. 凃金堂(2014)。中小學生「數學知識信念量表」之發展與信效度考驗。測驗學刊，61(4)，533-556。
   連結：
2. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
3. Baxter Magolda, M. B.(1992).Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns in students' intellectual development.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
4. Byrne, B. M.(2010).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.New York, NY:Routledge.
5. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9,233-255.
6. DeBacker, T. K.,Crowson, H. M.,Beesley, A. D.,Thoma, S. J.,Hestevold, H. L.(2008).The challenge of measuring epistemic beliefs: An analysis of three self-report instruments.Journal of Experimental Education,76(3),281-312.
7. Gregorich, S. E.(2006).Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.Medical Care,44,78-94.
8. Hair, J.,Black, W.,Babin, B.,Anderson, R.,Tatham, R.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
9. Harrington, D.(2009).Confirmatory factor analysis.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
10. Hofer, B. K.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.)(2002).Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hofer, B. K.,Pintrich, P. R.(1997).The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning.Review of Educational Research,67,88-140.
12. Hofer, B. K.,Sinatra, G. M.(2010).Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field.Metacognition and Learning,5,113-120.
13. Jackson, D. L.,Gillaspy, J. A.,Purc-Stephenson, R.(2009).Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations.Psychological Methods,14,6-23.
14. Jehng, J. J.,Johnson, S. D.,Anderson, R. C.(1993).Schooling and students' epistemological beliefs about learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology,18,23-35.
15. King, P. M.,Kitchener, K. S.(1994).Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
16. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
17. Kuhn, D.(1991).The skills of argument.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
18. Mintchik, N. M.,Farmer, T. A.(2009).Associations between epistemological beliefs and moral reasoning: Evidence from accounting.Journal of Business Ethics,84,259-275.
19. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling,10,622-647.
20. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
21. Paulsen, M. B.,Wells, T. C.(1998).Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students.Research in Higher Education,39,365-384.
22. Perry, W. G.(1970).Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years.New York, NY:Academic Press.
23. Pett, M. A.,Lackey, N. R.,Sullivan, J. J.(2003).Making sense of factor analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
24. Rodríguez, L.,Cano, F.(2006).The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students.Studies in Higher Education,31,617-636.
25. Schommer, M.(1990).Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,498-504.
26. Steinmetz, H.,Schmidt, P.,Tina-Booh, A.,Wieczorek, S.,Schwartz, S. H.(2009).Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement.Quality and Quantity,43,599-616.
27. Tümkaya, S.(2012).The investigation of the epistemological beliefs of university students according to gender, grade, fields of study, academic success and their learning styles.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,12,88-95.
28. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
29. 吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式─AMOS 的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
30. 郭生玉(2006)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:精華。
31. 陳品華(2011)。,未出版
32. 黃芳銘(2003)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
33. 劉佩雲(2005)。大學生知識信念與數位學習環境中知識管理能力之研究。管理與教育研究學報，4，57-84。
34. 凃金堂。SPSS 與量化研究。臺北市:五南。

1. 賴英娟、巫博瀚(2018)。臺灣國中生「數學知識信念量表」之編製。測驗學刊，65(3)，315-339。
2. 凃金堂(2017)。國小教師數學知識信念量表之發展與信效度考驗。教育心理學報，49(2)，295-320。
3. 凃金堂(2021)。國小師資生知識認知、學習取向與教學概念的中介效果考驗。教育心理學報，53(2)，437-462。