在技能精熟歷程中的創造力演進模式研究—以陶藝拉坯造形創造力為例

An Evolution Model for Ceramic Forming Creativity in Skill Mastery Process

李堅萍(Zen-Pin Lee)；朱素貞(Su-Chen Chu)；李學然(Shyue-Ran Li)；劉蕙儀(Huei-Yi Liu)

陶藝 ； 造形創造力 ； 精熟技能 ； Ceramics ； Forming Creativity ； Skill Mastery

臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類

30卷1期（2016 / 06 / 01）

91 - 106

繁體中文

創造力是許多職業精進革新的要件，而技能又是創造力的基礎要件之一；擁有精熟技術，才能談創新。但在學校教育系統上，這卻是兩難的議題，因為專注於鑽研技能，「以技害藝」，有可能損害創意。故本研究以造形創造力為例，設定研究目的為：探索技能精熟學生之1.造形流暢力、造形變通力、造形獨創力、造形精進力，與2.造形創造力（總分）的演進形式。經汰選422名學習陶藝技術達精熟的224名大學生為研究對象，開發「造形創造力評量表」與「陶藝技能形式檢核表」兩種研究工具，經信效度考驗，於技能學習歷程的第三、八、十三、十八週，分別施測兩研究工具，獲取研究對象的造形創造力與技能形式。結論：技能精熟學生之1. 造形流暢力、造形變通力、造形獨創力、造形精進力等的演進形式分別是反倒勾型、浪紋型、倒勾型、ㄏ字型四種線型。2.造形創造力（總分）是初始便頗具程度，達到高峰後維持高原期之略呈「斜頂蓋」線型。建議教師應於學習者學習技術的歷程中，「在對的時間點及時強化」學習者的造形創造力。

Creativity is an important element of improvements and innovations in many professions, and technology is one of the basic elements of creativity. Furthermore, there can be no creativity without the mastery of skills. However, a conflict between these two arises in the education system of schools because focusing technology training could undermine students’ creativity. Therefore, this study takes forming creativity as an example, and explores a skill-mastery students' evolution model for (1) forming fluency, forming flexibility, forming originality, and forming elaboration, as well as for (2) forming creativity (total scores). A total of 224 mastery-skill university students in a ceramics craft course were selected from 422 ones to be the subjects. This study developed two research tools and that incorporated tests of reliability and validity. These two tools are referred to as ＂Evaluation list of forming creativity＂ and ＂Checklist of ceramic psychomotor forms.＂. During an 18-week instruction semester of ceramic craft skill, this study used ＂Evaluation list of forming creativity＂ and ＂Checklist of ceramic psychomotor forms＂ research tools to obtain forming creativity and psychomotor forms from 224 mastery-skill- student examples at the 3^(rd), 8^(th), 13^(th), and 18^(th) weeks. There are two conclusions. (1) The four evolution models of forming fluency, forming flexibility, forming originality, and forming elaboration of skill-mastery students are inverse-reverse-J line type, wave line type, reverse-J line type, and ㄏ line type, respectively. (2) The evolution model of forming creativity (total scores) displays a line type which is in the middle level at the beginning, maintains a plateau and slightly rises towards the end. It is suggested that teachers should strengthen learners' forming creativity at the appropriate times during the process of learning a skill.

1. 李堅萍、游光昭、朱益賢(2008)。國中科技教育運用Teresa M. Amabile 工作動機原則與自我效能激發策略之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，25(2)，129-159。
   連結：
2. Aish, D.(2014).Pennsylvania,University of Pennsylvania.
3. Alese, O. D.(2011).The role of women's creativity and innovations in the Nigerian informal sector of Oke Ogun zone.International Education Studies,4(3),213-223.
4. Alkhenaini, N.(2013).Pennsylvania,The University of the Arts.
5. Al-kreimeen, R.(2014).The relationship between individual creativity and self-regulationfrom grade nine students viewpoints in Jordan.International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research,78,85-90.
6. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford:Westview Press.
7. Awamleh, H.,Al Farah, Y.,El-Zraigat, I.(2012).The level of creative abilities dimensions according to Torrance formal test (B) and their relationship with some variables (sex, age, GPA).International Education Studies,5(6),138-148.
8. Barone, M. J.,Lyle, K. B.,Winterich, K. P.(2015).When deal depth doesn't matter: How handedness consistency influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparisons.Marketing Letters,26(2),213-223.
9. Biktagirova, G. F.,Kasimova, R. S.(2015).Development of university students' creative abilities.Review of European Studies,7(5),101-107.
10. Charyton, C.,Jagacinski, R. J.,Merrill, J. A.,Clifton, W.,DeDios, S.(2011).Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment.Journal of Engineering Education,100(4),778-799.
11. Culp, M.(2015).Diving into the creative realm.Art Education,68(3),6-10.
12. Danial, J. G.(2015).California,Alliant International University.
13. Diteeyont, W.(2013).Indiana,Purdue University.
14. Fleming, K. D.(2012).Pennsylvania,Pennsylvania State University.
15. Foreman, A.(2014).Arizona,Arizona State University.
16. Harrison, C. A.(2012).Minnesota,Walden University.
17. Huber, A. M.,Leigh, K. E.,Tremblay, K. R.(2012).Creativity processes of students in the design studio.College Student Journal,46(4),903-913.
18. Idi, D. B.,Khaidzir, K. A. B. M.(2015).Concept of creativity and innovation in architectural design process.International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology,6(1),16-20.
19. Kim, Y. S.,Lee, S. W.,Kim, M. S.,Park, J. A.,Jeong, J. Y.(2011).An exercise programme for cognitive elements of design creativity.Journal of Design Research,9(2),185-202.
20. Lorfink, R. L.(2012).Pennsylvania,Drexel University.
21. Myszkowski, N.,Storme, M.,Davila, A.,Lubart, T.(2015).Managerial creative problem solving and the big five personality traits.The Journal of Management Development,34(6),674-684.
22. Ness, R. B.(2015).Promoting innovative thinking.American Journal of Public Health,105,114-118.
23. Rubin, R. D.(2013).Illinois,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
24. Turner, S.(2013).Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of creativity across different key stages.Research in Education,89,23-40.
25. van de Kamp, M. T.,Admiraal, W.,van Drie, J.,Rijlaarsdam, G.(2015).Enhancing divergent thinking in visual arts education: Effects of explicit instruction of meta-cognition.British Journal of Educational Psychology,85(1),47.
26. Webb, A. N.,Rule, A. C.(2012).Second graders' Recycled/Craft item products demonstrate life cycle content knowledge and creativity skills.Creative Education,3(4),479-485.
27. Wu, M.,Li, K.,Hau, C.(2011).Technology creativity ability analysis for vocational high school students by data mining association rule.Proceedings of International Conference on Education and e-Learning (EeL),Singapore:
28. 李堅萍(2001)。Simpson、Harrow 與Goldberger 心理動作領域教育目標分類之比較研究。屏東師院學報，14，675-710。