题名

運用互動科技於博物館展示之環境教育體驗研究

并列篇名

The Study on Applying Interactive Technology to Museum Exhibition for Environmental Education Experiences

作者

王照明(Chao-Ming Wang)；郭書伶(Shu-Ling Guo)

关键词

互動藝術 ； 互動體驗 ； 博物館教育 ； 環境教育 ； Interactive Art ； Interactive Experience ； Museum Exhibition ； Environmental Education

期刊名称

臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類

卷期/出版年月

31卷2期（2017 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 21

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究運用互動科技探討博物館展示的環境教育議題。本研究藉由文獻探討與分析相關案例，提出本研究之設計原則，並了解互動科技運用於環境教育及博物館之現況；再以雛型開發法設計與實作出兩件不同互動類型的互動裝置－「地球小鯨魚」與「碳市」，並針對本研究作品進行公開展示、訪談、問卷調查及焦點團體訪談。研究結果發現，一、單人互動形式作品的環境教育學習認知評分高於多人互動形式作品，二、實體裝置作品的環境教育學習認知評分高於大螢幕圖像式裝置作品，三、互動裝置比起網頁教學更能提升環境教育之學習認知，且提升互動體驗能有效增加學習認知。
英文摘要

This study tried to apply interactive technology to museum exhibition, and adopted the theme of environmental education. First, this paper generalized the design principles according to the result of literature review and cases analysis, and understood of interactive technology how to apply for environmental education in museums. Second, we designed and implemented two artworks that based on the results of the literature review, one of the artworks was a single-player entity device, called ＂earth little whale,＂ and the other was a multiplayer large screen device, called ＂carbon market.＂ Third, these two artworks were publicly exhibited, and participants took part in the interviews, questionnaires and focus group interviews. Based on the above, this research analyzed the findings and conclusions as follows. 1. The cognitive score of the single-player group was higher than the multiplayer group. 2. The cognitive score of the entity device group was higher than the large screen device group. 3. The cognitive score of participating interactive art was better than browsing the web in environmental education.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林大維、吳佩樺(2010)。互動藝術脈絡與其美學之研究。藝術學報，87，31-54。
    連結：
  2. xXtraLab. (2008) 黃蝶翠谷Retrieved March 18,2014, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmKlik99ZQk
  3. 無有有限公司( 2012 )。LF 光田企劃 Light Farm。線上檢索日期： 2014 年 3月18 日。網址：https://www.facebook.com/lfwooyo
  4. 吳淑敏(2007)。「行氣」Flow of Qi @2007 奧地利電子藝術節。線上檢索日期： 2014 年3月 30 日。網址：http://blog.roodo.com/kiplingchao/archives/14311573.html
  5. Hörner, U., & Antlfinger, M. (2010). Dream Water Wonderland. Retrieved March 18, 2014 , from http://digitalartfestival.tw/daf11/invillageCreation_en.html
  6. Raaf, S. (2004). Grower. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://raaf.org/Electronic_Works/Grower/Grower_frames.html
  7. 青鳥新媒體藝術(2011 )。富春山居圖與麗訊科技精湛的投影科技饗宴。線上檢索日期：2014 年 3月 30 日。網址：http://www.vivitekasia.com/news_view.aspx?id=117
  8. 曾靖越( 2008 )。Unheeded Advice。線上檢索日期： 0 年 月 日。網址：http://www.cute.edu.tw/dmdweb/119_edm_3.htm
  9. PentagramDesign. (2008). New Work: Detroit Institute of Arts. Retrieved March 30, 2014, from http://new.pentagram.com/2008/05/new-work-detroit-institute-of-1/
  10. ICOM. (2007). Museum Definition. Retrieved March 14,2014, from http://icom.museum/the-vision/museum-definition/
  11. Shinichi, T. (2008). Five "Tangible Earth". Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.tangible-earth.com/
  12. VariateLabs. (2011). LAMH World That Was Touch Table. Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.variatelabs.com/lamh_world_that_was_touchtable/
  13. InteractiveInstitute. (2014). THE VERGE: MUSEUM LETS VISITORS 'DIGITALLY UNWRAP' AN EGYPTIAN MUMMY. Retrieved March 30,2014, from https://www.tii.se/
  14. Hurlbut, J. (2012). SFPUC Digital Arts Panorama. Retrieved March 30,2014 , from http://cargocollective.com/jameshurlbut
  15. Ahmad, S.,Abbas, M. Y.,Yusof, W. Z. M.,Taib, M. Z. M.(2013).Museum Learning: Using Research as Best Practice in Creating Future Museum Exhibition.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,105,370-382.
  16. Ascott, R.(1966).Behaviourist art and cybernetic vision.Cybernetica,9(4),247.
  17. Rosenthal, M.(2003).Understanding installation art : from Duchamp to Holzer.London:Prestel Pub.
  18. Schmitt, B.(1999).Experiential Marketing.Journal of marketing management,15(1),53-67.
  19. Stapp, W. B.(1969).The Concept of Environmental Education.Journal of environmental education,1(1),30-31.
  20. United Nations Environment Programme(1975).The Belgrade Charter: a framework for environmental education.International Workshop on Environmental Education,Belgrade:
  21. 丁維欣、莊冠群、戴采如、黃琬淳、翁菁邑、林均霈(2012)。博物館教育科技媒體：五個值得思考的問題。博物館與文化，4，169-196。
  22. 楊冠政(1997)。環境教育。臺北:明文書局。
  23. 蕭新煌(1990)。環境意識。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
  24. 賴鼎陞、張哲娬(2005)。博物館數位展示與活動設計：以「宋徽宗的御花園」巡迴展為例。數位學習在故宮（一）館校合作策略、應用與實務，台北:
被引用次数
  1. 陳映羽,張美珍,王裕宏(2019)。博物館互動科技情境對國小五年級學童防疫認知及行為意向之影響。科技博物，23(4)，5-31。
  2. (2024)。以Q方法探討科普影片的美感知覺類型之研究。先進工程學刊，19(3)，93-103。
print cancel