What Does EXHIBITION Exhibit: A Comparative Domain Transitivity Analysis

EXHIBITION展現了什麼語意內涵：及物性之領域比較分析

李鴻麟(Larry Hong-lin Li)

exhibitions ； arts and leisure ； transitivity profile ； ideational meaning ； curatorial views ； 展覽 ； 藝術與休閒 ； 及物性分析 ； 概念性意義 ； 策展觀點

臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類

34卷2期（2020 / 12 / 01）

33 - 52

英文

We investigated how the notion EXHIBITION is transitively profiled in the written communication targeted at arts- and leisure-minded readers in terms of functional and operational meaning dimensions. Along the functional dimension, exhibitions are characterized in more diverse roles in arts; on the contrary, exhibitions are typecast as taking on more static roles in leisure. Along the operational dimension, exhibitions are characterized as both efficacious and inert at the same time in arts; comparatively, exhibitions are pictured uniformly as more active and vigorous in leisure. Our findings demonstrated (i) the comparative disciplinary transitivity portrayals and associated ideational representations of EXHIBITION, which might reflect the expectations of visitors, and (ii) the differential role conceptions built up in curatorial views in contrast to linguistic profiles.

本研究從功能和操作兩大面向來探索EXHIBITION（展覽）這個詞彙在藝術和休閒領域相關的書面語言中所蘊含的語意概念。在功能面向上，EXHIBITION在藝術領域中所賦予的角色較為多樣化；相反地，EXHIBITION在休閒領域中扮演較為靜態的角色。在操作面向上，EXHIBITION在藝術範疇中帶有既有影響力又兼具被動性的特質；相比之下，EXHIBITION在休閒範疇中則扮演較為活躍的角色。我們的研究結果指出：一、EXHIBITION在不同領域所呈現的語意特性和相關的經驗反映了參觀者的期望；二、策展理論中對於「展覽」所賦予的角色概念與其在語言中的體現存在差異。

1. Alejo, R.(2010).Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy.Journal of Pragmatics,42(4),1137-1150.
2. Argamon, S.(Ed.),Burns, K.(Ed.),Dubnov, S.(Ed.)(2010).The Structure of Style.Berlin, Germany:Springer.
3. Burke, M.(Ed.)(2017).The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics.New York:Routledge.
4. Butler, C. S.(2013).Systemic functional linguistics, cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics: Opportunities for dialogue.Functions of Language,20(2),185-218.
5. Castro, M. B.(2012).Verb dynamics. Terminology.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication,18(2),149-166.
6. Cohen, H.(Ed.),Lefebvre, C.(Ed.)(2005).Handbook of categorization in cognitive science.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
7. Collins, P.,Hollo, C.(2016).English grammar: An introduction.London:Macmillan International Higher Education.
8. Croft, W.(1993).The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies.Cognitive Linguistics,4,335-370.
9. Croft, W.,Cruse, D. A.(2004).Cognitive linguistics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
10. Desvallées, A.,Mairesse, F.(2010).Key concepts of museology.Kopie:Armand Colin.
11. Evans, V.,Green, M.(2006).Cognitive linguistics. An introduction.Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
12. Falk, J. H.,Dierking, L. D.(2018).Learning from museums.Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Halliday, M. A. K.(2013).Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar.London:Arnold.
14. Halliday, M.,Matthiessen, C.(2014).An introduction to functional grammar.New York, NY:Routledge.
15. Hamilton, C.,Adolphs, S.,Nerlich, B.(2007).The meanings of ‘risk’: A view from corpus linguistics.Discourse & Society,18(2),163-181.
16. Hardy, D. E.,Colombini, C. B.(2011).A genre, collocational, and constructional analysis of RISK.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,16(4),462-485.
17. K, J.(Ed.)(2000).Corpora galore: analyses and techniques in describing English.Rodopi.
18. Langacker, R. W.(1987).Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites.Stanford university press.
19. Leech, G.,Short, M.(1981).A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose.London:Pearson Longman.
20. MacGregor, G.(1999).Making sense of the past in the present: a sensory analysis of carved stone balls.World Archaeology,31(2),258-271.
21. Marincola, P.(2007).What makes a great exhibition?.London:Reaktion Books.
22. Ntzani, D.(2015).Under the Spell of Metaphors: Investigating the effects of conduit and container metaphors on museum experience.Curator: The Museum Journal,58(1),59-76.
23. Ortony, Andrew(Ed.)(1979).Metaphor and thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
24. Oyeleye, L.,Osisanwo, A.(2013).Expression of ideologies in media accounts of the 2003 and 2007 general elections in Nigeria.Discourse & Society,24(6),763-773.
25. Ravelli, L.(2007).Museum Texts: Comunication Frameworks.New York, NY:Routledge.
26. Rogers, M.(2004).Multidimensionality in concepts systems: A bilingual textual perspective.Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication,10(2),215-240.
27. Tercedor, M.(2011).The cognitive dynamics of terminological variation.Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication,17(2),181-197.
28. Thompson, G.(2013).Introducing functional grammar.London:Routledge.
29. Van Dijk, T. A.(2006).Ideology and discourse analysis.Journal of Political Ideologies,11(2),115-140.
30. Villeneuve, P.(Ed.)(2007).From periphery to center: art museum education in the 21st century.Reston, Virginia:National Art Education Association.
31. Voice, M. A.(2018).Writing Fighting: Critical Cognitive Approaches to the Language of Killing in War.The University of Sheffield.
32. Williams, E. J.(Ed.)(2012).Critical Issues in Literacy Pedagogy: Notes from the Trenches.San Diego:Cognella Academic Publishing.