說服訊息處理與態度改變：以品牌碳酸飲料為例

Persuasive Message Process and Attitude Change: An Example of Brand-name Soft Drink

潘家鑫(Chia-Hsin Pan)

態度改變 ； 訊息處理 ； 渉入感 ； 理性程度 ； 睡眠者效果 ； 碳酸飲料 ； attitude change ； information process ； involvement ； rationality ； sleeper effect ； soft drink

中國廣告學刊

20期（2015 / 03 / 01）

86 - 102

繁體中文

大眾傳播研究領域中，說服性媒體內容影響態度改變效果是重要的課題之一，研究發現，態度改變的短期和長期效果有很大的不同，一般說來，傳播的效果會因為時間而遞減，通常最大的態度改變效果會在說服傳播之後立即產生，再來就漸漸地回復到原先的狀態，但也有延遲態度改變的情形發生，例如睡眠者效果。而國內較缺乏產生睡眠者效果相關條件的研究。本研究試圖探討說服訊息處理型式與折扣線索，對於受測者立即與長期態度改變的影響。本實驗採取2 × 2（理性思考程度高低 × 折扣線索有無）因素設計，檢驗實驗操弄的品牌碳酸飲料宣傳訊息以及健康訊息的折扣線索，對於受測大學生的說服效果。結果顯示，實驗操弄交互作用對於受測者的延遲態度改變具有緣際效果，最後並提出實務上的建議。

Attitude change affected by persuasive media content is one of the most important topics in the field of media effect research. Studies found that short term and long term effects are different. In ordinary, persuasion effects will decrease over time, which may be found immediately then attitude returns to the base line. However, sometimes delayed attitude changes could be observed by some research, such as sleeper effect. Less local study focuses on related stipulations of the possible influence of sleeper effect. The present study attempts to investigate the effects of information processing styles and discounting cues on participants' immediate and delayed attitude changes. A 2 (high/low rationality) × 2 (with/without discounting cue) factorial design was employed to examine the extent to which the persuasiveness of a name brand soft drink's campaign messages and health promotion messages as discounting cues have effects on college students. Results revealed interactive marginal effects between factors on attitude changes over time. Practical applications were suggested.

1. 張旨華（2005）。〈網路已成美國消費者心中最可靠的醫療資訊媒介〉，資策會FIND 網站
2. Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
3. Alexander, J. E.,Tate, M. A.(1999).Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the Web.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Appel, M.,Richter, T.(2007).Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time.Media Psychology,10,113-134.
5. Berger, C. R.(2000).Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in news reports: The scary world of frequency data.Human Communication Research,26,27-52.
6. Berger, C. R.(1998).Processing quantitative data about risk and threat in news reports.Journal of Communication,48,87-106.
7. Berger, C. R.(2002).Base-rate bingo: Ephemeral effects of population data on cognitive responses, apprehension, and perceived risk.Communication Research,29,99-124.
8. Bray, G. A.,Nielsen, S. J.,Popkin, B. M.(2004).Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity.American Journal of Clinic Nutrition,79,537-543.
9. Brown, C. M.,Dulloo, A. G.,Montani, J. P.(2008).Sugary drinks in the pathogenesis of obesity and cardiovascular diseases.International Journal of Obesity,32,28-34.
10. Chaiken, S.(1980).Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39,752-766.
11. Chaiken, S.(Ed.),Trope, Y.(Ed.)(1999).Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York:Guilford.
12. Chaiken, S.,Maheswaran, D.(1994).Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,66,460-473.
13. Cook, T. D.,Gruder, C. L.,Hennigan, K. M.,Flay, B. R.(1979).History of the sleeper effect: Some logical pitfalls in accepting the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin,86,662-679.
14. Epstein, S.(1994).Integration of cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.American Psychologist,49,709-724.
15. Epstein, S.,Pacini, R.(1999).Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory.New York:Guilford.
16. Flanagin, A. J.,Metzger, M. J.(2000).Perceptions of Internet information credibility.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,77,515-540.
17. Fogg, B. J.(2003).Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do.San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann.
18. Gellig, P. M.,Greenwald, A. G.(1974).Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,29,132-139.
19. Ha, E. -J.,Bish, N. C.,Holloman, C.,Gordon, K. L.(2009).Evaluation of effectiveness of class-based nutrition intervention on changes in soft drink and milk consumption among young adults.Nutrition Journal,8,1-6.
20. Hovland, C. I.,Weiss, W.(1951).The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.Public Opinion Quarterly,15,635-650.
21. Kalbfleisch, P. J.(Ed.)(2003).Communication yearbook 27.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Kelman, H. C.,Hovland, C. I.(1953)."Reinstatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,48,327-335.
23. Kumkale, G. T.,Albarracin, D.(2004).The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review.Psychology Bulletin,130,143-172.
24. Lariscy, R. A. W.,Tinkham, S. F.(1999).The sleeper effect and negative political advertising.Journal of Advertising,4,13-30.
25. Pacini, R.,Epstein, S.(1999).The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76,972-987.
26. Petty, R. E.,Cacioppo, J. T.(1986).Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.New York:Springer-Verlag.
27. Powers, J. J.(Ed.),Xiao, X.(Ed.)(2008).The Social Construction of SARS.Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
28. Pratkanis, A. R.,Greenwald, A. G.,Leippe, M. R.,Baumgardner, M. H.(1988).In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,203-218.
29. Priester, J.,Wegener, D.,Petty, R.,Fabrigar, L.(1999).Examining the psychological process underlying the sleeper effect: The elaboration likelihood model explanation.Media Psychology,1,27-48.
30. Wells, W. D.(Ed.)(1997).Measuring advertising effectiveness.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Zhou, S, Pan, C.,Zhong, X.(2006).Effects of experientiality and story attributes on risk perception and story evaluation.annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication,San Francisco:
32. 宋明潔(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中山大學企業管理學系。
33. 林千鈺(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。
34. 許惠君(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科大企管系。
35. 潘敏(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。長庚大學護理學研究所。
36. 簡淑真(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所。
37. 蘇暐婷(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學管理學院經營管理學程。