题名

干擾或溝通?線上遊戲廣告置入效果之研究-置入形式、置入地點暨玩家回憶度、偏好度為例

并列篇名

The Study on the Effectiveness of Advertising Placement in the Online Games-Format, Location, and Players' Recall and Preference

作者

賴建都(Jian-Dou Lai);黎佩芬(Pei-Fen Li)

关键词

線上遊戲 ; 廣告置入 ; 眼動儀測量 ; 廣告效果 ; 廣告涉入 ; Advertising evaluation ; Advertising placement ; Eye tracking ; On-line game

期刊名称

中國廣告學刊

卷期/出版年月

22期(2017 / 03 / 01)

页次

41 - 79

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近年來由於線上遊戲使用人口急速竄升,讓廣告主注意到遊戲中置入廣告的可行性。由於傳統媒體(例如:電視、廣播、報紙、雜誌及戶外) 廣告的操作與效果的測量,無論是理論基礎或實務應用都已臻成熟,但反觀線上遊戲的廣告置入與效果的測量卻亟待研究探索。線上遊戲種類相當多元,再加上操作模式與效果測量相關理論的缺乏,使得線上遊戲的廣告置入成功案例不多。本研究試圖從廣告效果的角度,去評估線上遊戲廣告的置入形式( 包括:In-game 與Around-game 等不同位置) 的注意程度,遊戲玩家對知名品牌暨新奇品牌廣告的回憶度及偏好度。本研究分為二階段進行,第一階段主要針對線上遊戲置入的型態,包括:In-game advertising 與Around-game advertising 置入位置的效果測量,從使用者瀏覽廣告的視覺軌跡動線到廣告的回憶測試調查。作者採用實驗法,並使用眼球追蹤儀(Eye-tracking System ),觀察使用者在進行遊戲時的眼球凝視點(Fixations) 分布情況及視覺動線(Scan paths) 位置,研究中測量五十位線上遊戲的使用者,研究發現新奇品牌廣告(玉露桔茶) 的整體凝視時間、平均凝視時間及百分比皆高於知名品牌( 麥香),作者推測受測者在等待遊戲下載時,不需耗費太多的注意力在遊戲上,因而有多餘的時間與精神去注意新奇的廣告,而知名品牌的廣告對於受測者而言,因為已經過於熟悉,故花費較少的時間去閱讀廣告訊息。第二階段的調查重點則在於驗證第一階段的研究結果。作者與線上遊戲業者合作,規劃不同的廣告置入物於「全民打棒球」的遊戲中,並結合調查法進行,調查遊戲玩家對廣告的回憶度及品牌的偏好度,此次問卷調查總共有7,303 位玩家來填寫問卷,刪除無效樣本後為6,443 位。研究主要發現為:新品牌廣告在Around-game 的環境下,比較會被注意,但在回憶度的效果測 試上卻還是知名品牌較優;知名品牌廣告在In-game 的環境下,較有機會被玩家注意到,玩家看見知名品牌廣告時,可能會知覺到這是熟悉的訊息而不自覺多加凝視,但當看見不熟悉的訊息時則無法耗費太多的關注力在新品牌廣告上。此外,玩家遊戲涉入度越高,越不容易注意到廣告,研究發現無論是在Around-game 或是In-game 的環境下,玩家遊戲的經驗與使用的頻率越高越不容易注意到廣告,作者判斷,由於玩家對於遊戲的環境過於熟習或對於遊戲涉入的程度太高,太專注在遊戲上,因而忽略周圍置入的廣告。

英文摘要

As the online game players increase dramatically, advertisers are aware of their potentials to place advertising and brand in the online games. Unlike the operation and evaluation of traditional media advertising, such as television, radio, newspaper, magazine and outdoor, have been firmly constructed both in theoretical and practical applications , the effectiveness of online game advertising and its evaluation are still ambiguous . It needs further study and investigation. Owing to the increasing of users and the families have connected to the internet, the ages of online game players have sprayed from young, teenager to other ages, thus make the advertisers willing to invest more budgets on the online game advertising. On the other hand, the categories of the online games are complexity, and their formats of advertising placement are also difficult to measure, therefore, very few of successful cases are found in the advertising industry. The study is to investigate the viewers' attention upon different format of advertising placements (both in-game and around game) from the perspective of advertising effectiveness, and understand viewers' recall and preference toward different brand. In the first year, the author evaluated the effectiveness of both in-game and around game advertising through eye-tracking study and observed subjects' scan paths, number of fixations, and times of duration. Fifty participants were recruited in the study. The authors found that the novel brand's advertisement's total numbers of fixations, times of visual gaze and subjects' eye movements were higher than the famous brand's advertisement. The authors referred that participants did not pay much attention on the game while they were waiting for patching, therefore they could put more efforts on the novel brand's advertisement. Because they were already familiar with the famous brand, the participants did not spend much time on the famous brand's advertisement. In the second year, the study was to verify the first year's finding from the eye-tracking experiment. The study collaborated with the online game company, Cayenne Entertainment Corporation, to place both novel brand and famous brand's advertisements in their online game, "the Baseball Online." The survey method was conducted to investigate the players' recall and brands' preferences. The survey recruited 7303 players to submit the questionnaires and 6443 samples were valid. The survey found that the novel brand's advertisement was attracted more attention than the famous brand's advertisement during the around game environment, but in the recall test, the famous brand's advertisement was better than the novel brand's. While during the in-game environment, the famous brand's advertisement performed better both in players' recall and visual attention, the authors inferred that players unconsciously gazed on the familiar message. On the other hand, the players were unable to pay attention on the novel brand message while they were immersing in the game scenario. In addition, the authors also found that both in around game environment and in-game environment, the experienced and high frequency players tended to ignore the advertisements. The authors concluded that those players are too familiar with the game environment or focusing on the game, therefore did not pay too much attention on the advertisements.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 黎佩芬、賴建都(2011)。網路重度使用者對網頁訊息認知與瀏模式之研究─以台灣購物網站商品訊息呈現為例。電子商務學報,13(3),517-554。
    連結:
  2. Buswell, GT (1935), How people look at pictures, A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Kelly, P. (2003), In-game Advertising, Games Europe (December 16), www.gameseurope.com/articles/430/print
  4. Antes, J. R.(1974).The time course of picture viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103(1),62-70.
  5. Assael, H.(1992).Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action.Boston:PSW-Kent Publishing.
  6. Assael, H.(2005).A Demographic and Psychographic Profile of Heavy Internet Users and Users by Type of Internet Usage.Journal of Advertising Research,March,93-123.
  7. Atkinson, R.C.,Shiffrin, R.M.(1968).Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Process.The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol.2,New York:
  8. Babin, L. A.,Carder, S. T.(1996).Advertising via the box office: Is product placement effective?.Journal of Promotion Management,3(1/2),31-51.
  9. Baker, M. A.,Loeb, M.(1973).Implications of measurement of eye fixations for a psychophysics of form perception.Perception & Psychophysics,13(2),185-192.
  10. Baxter, M.(1995).Product Design-Practical methods for the systematic development of new product.London:Chapman & Hall.
  11. Boyland, M.,Janes, I.,Barber, H.(2004).ESOMAR, Technovate 2ESOMAR, Technovate 2,Barcelona:.
  12. Chaiken, S.(1980).Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39,752-766.
  13. Chaney, I. M.,Lin, Ku-Ho,Chaney, J.(2004).The Effect of Billboards Within the Gaming Environment.Journal of Interactive Media,5(1),54-69.
  14. D'Astous, A.,Chartier, F.(1999).A study of factors affecting consumer evaluations and memory of product placement in movies.Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising,22(2),31-52.
  15. Dodge, R.(1990).Visual Perceptions During Eye Movement.Psychological Review,7,454-465.
  16. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
  17. Fox, R. J.,Krugman, D. M.,Fletcher, J. E.,Fischer, P. M.(1998).Adolescents' Attention to Beer and Cigarette Print Ads and Associated Product Warnings.Journal of Advertising,27(3),57-68.
  18. Frazier, M.(2006).How can your package standout, Eye tracking looks hard for answers.Advertising Age,77(42),14.
  19. Gould, S.,Gupta, P.(2006).Come on Down: A Study of How Consumers' View, Game Shows and the Product Placed in Them.Journal of Advertising,35(1),65-81.
  20. Greenwald, A. G.,Leavitt, C.(1984).Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels.Journal of Consumer Research,11,581-592.
  21. Gupta, P. B.,Lord, K. R.(1998).Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall.Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising,20(1),47-59.
  22. Henderson, J. M.,Hollingworth, A.(1998).High-level scene perception.Annual Review of Psychology,50,243-271.
  23. Henderson, J. M.,Weeks, P.A.,Hollingworth, A.(1999).The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25(1),210-228.
  24. Hulsebos, L.,Bos, H.,Appel, M.(2004).In quest of the Holy Grail. The bumpy road from OTS to Certainty to See.ESOMAR, Cross Media Conference,Geneva:
  25. Just, M. A.,Carpenter, P. A.(1976).The role of eye-fixation research in cognitive psychology.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers,8,139-143.
  26. Just, Marcel A.,Carpenter, Patricia(1980).A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension.Psychological Review,87(4),329-354.
  27. Lai, Chien-Tu,Li, Pei-Fen(2011).A study on the visual communicative effectiveness of graphic warning labels on tobacco packages in Taiwan.China Media Research,7(1),25-38.
  28. Lavidge, R.J.,Steiner, G.A.(1961).A model for predictive measurement of advertising effectiveness.Journal of Marketing,25,59-62.
  29. Lee, M.,Faber, R. J.(2007).Effects of Product Placement on On-line Games on Brand Memory.Journal of Advertising Research,37(4),75-90.
  30. Mackworth, N.H.,Morandi, A.J.(1967).The gaze selects informative details within pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,2,547-552.
  31. Megaw, E. D.,Richardson, J.(1979).Eye movements and industrial inspection.Applied Ergonomics,10(3),145-154.
  32. Neboit, M.,Richardson, J.(1987).Eye movement recording in ergonomics and applied research.Eye Movements: from physionlogy to Cognition,North-Holland:
  33. Nelson, M. R.(2002).Recall of Brand Placement in Computer/Video Games.Journal of Advertising Research,42(2),80-92.
  34. Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯(1999)。質的評量與研究。台北:桂冠。
  35. Petty, R.,Cacioppo, J.(1981).Issue involvement as a moderator of effects on attitude of advertising content and context.Advances in Consumer Research,8,20-24.
  36. Rayner, Keith(1978).Eye Movement in Reading and Information Processing.Psychological Bulletin,85(78),618-660.
  37. Rayner, Keith(1977).Visual Attention in Reading: Eye Movement Reflect Cognitive Processes.Memory and Cognition,5(4),443-448.
  38. Russell, C.A.(2002).Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placement in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence of Brand Memory and Attitude.Journal of Consumer Research,29,306-318.
  39. Sanders, M.S.,McCormick, E.J.(1992).Human Factors in Engineering and Design.New York:McGraw-Hill Books.
  40. Shapiro, J. M.(1993).Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients.Signal Processing,41(12),3445-3462.
  41. Solso, R.L.(2003).The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  42. Solso, R.L.(199).Cognition And Visual Arts.U.S.A.:Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  43. Steortz, E. M.(1987).West Virginia University.
  44. Vollmers, S.,Mizerski, R.(1994).A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placement in films.Proceedings of the 1994 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising,Athens, GA:
  45. Wang, A.(2005).Integrating and comparing other's opinions: The effects of third-party endorsements on online purchasing.Journal of Web-site Promotion,1(1),105-29.
  46. Wang, A.(2003).Customer testimonials and news clips as contextual cues in the consumer cognitive processing of online shopping: How do they build trust and then increase purchase intention.Journal of Promotion Management,9(1/2),145-62.
  47. Wang, A.(2005).The effects of expert and consumer endorsements on audience response.Journal of Advertising Research,45(4),402-412.
  48. Yang, G. Z.,Laura, D.M.,Hu, X.P.,Rowe, A.(2002).Visual search: Psychophysical models and pracital applications.Image and Vision computer,20,273-287.
  49. Yang, M.,Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R.,Dinu, L.,Arpan, L. M.(2006).Marketer & Agency Guide to Online Game Advertising.Interactive Advertising Bureau.
  50. Yang, M.,Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R.,Dinu, L.,Arpan, L. M.(2006).The Effectiveness of "in-game".Advertising, Journal of Advertising Research,35(4),143-152.
  51. Yarbus, AL.(1967).Eye Movement and Vision.New York:Plenum.
  52. 王馨逸(2008)。置入式廣告─線上遊戲產業另一個春天?。尼爾森媒體新知,2008(2 月號)
  53. 朱瀅(2000)。實驗心理學。北京大學出版社。
  54. 吳家州(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學科技管理研究所。
  55. 李廷妍(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學國際貿易學系研究所。
  56. 林君珍(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學觀光研究所。
  57. 姚志隆(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士班。
  58. 唐大崙、莊賢智(2004)。新聞圖文左右空間配置對視線影響之初探。銘傳大學設計國際學術研討會,台北:
  59. 張武成(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學資訊管理學系。
  60. 張信賢(2006)。國立成功大學工業設計研究所。
  61. 張蜀永(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所。
  62. 曹君逸(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學傳播研究所。
  63. 許美惠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中國文化大學新聞研究所。
  64. 陳秋雲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班。
  65. 楊秀敏(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學廣告學系研究所。
  66. 董家豪(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南華大學資訊管理學系。
  67. 蔡季綾(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學國際企業研究所。
  68. 蔡國隆(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中正大學企業管理研究所。
  69. 鄭自隆(2003)。媒體話題─置入式行銷不是毒蛇猛獸。動腦雜誌,324,70-71。
  70. 賴建都(2008)。國科會專題研究報告國科會專題研究報告,國科會。
  71. 賴建都、黎佩芬(2010)。戶外廣告設立位置差異及影響可見度之研究。廣告學研究,34,1-24。
  72. 賴建都、傅銘傳、孫慶文、蔡政旻(2006)。電視購物頻道畫面訊息置入研究。第十四屆中華民果廣告暨公共關係國際學術與實務研討會,台北:
  73. 薛念祖(1998)。電子娛樂風潮下的線上遊戲市場。Internet Pioneer,46,74-80。