台灣成年早期未婚者多重親密關係態度之分析

Public Attitude Toward Multiple Intimate Relationships Among Unmarried Young Adults in Taiwan

康依婷(Kang,Yi-Ting)；陳敬堯(Chen,Chin-Yao)；朱均虹(Chu,Chun-Hung)；管昱翔(Kuan,Yu-Siang)；張書渝(Chang,Shu-Yu)；綦珮如(Chi,Pei-Ru)

多重親密關係 ； 單一伴侶制 ； 非單一伴侶制 ； 身體親密 ； 情感親密 ； non-monogamous relationship ； monogamy ； non-monogamy ； sexual intimacy ； emotional intimacy

輔導與諮商學報

41卷1期（2019 / 05 / 01）

55 - 76

繁體中文

「單一伴侶之外的多重親密關係」的現象越來越浮上檯面，但目前以「單一伴侶制」（monogamy）為主的社會下，多重親密關係常被冠上負面的評價。因此，本研究欲以身體親密及情感親密兩個向度，探討在不同背景變項上（性別、性傾向、交往經驗及關係認同），各族群對於多重親密關係的開放態度。其中有關身體親密及情感親密的兩個向度會再細分為「對自己伴侶（發展）多重身體親密關係之接受度」、「對自己伴侶（發展）多重情感親密關係之接受度」、「對他人伴侶（發展）多重身體親密關係之接受度」、「對他人伴侶（發展）多重情感親密關係之接受度」四個層次。本研究之研究參與者為919位18至35歲未婚成年人，研究工具為自編之多重親密關係態度量表，進行兩次預試並據結果進行修訂，於PTT網路平台進行施測。研究結果以單因子多變量分析後發現：一、男性在「對自己伴侶（發展）多重身體親密關係之接受度」、「對自己伴侶（發展）多重情感親密關係之接受度」、「對他人伴侶（發展）多重身體親密關係之接受度」、「對他人伴侶（發展）多重情感親密關係之接受度」皆顯著高於女性。二、同性戀者在四個層次的開放度皆顯著高於異性戀者。三、無交往經驗者比有交往經驗者更能接受伴侶對自己之外的人關懷、關注、講心事等情感親密行為。四、在關係認同上，非單一伴侶制者比起單一伴侶制者在四個層次上有較高的開放度。本研究為多重親密關係態度之初探性研究，從研究結果推演未來研究方向，以及相關的限制及建議，期待後續相關研究可進一步拓展國人對多重親密關係的了解。

The unconventional intimate/sex arrangements such as non-monogamous relationships (NMR) have come to emerge in modern Taiwanese society. Although NMR has become less of ＂taboo＂ and ＂unspeakable＂ over the years, a vast majority of people in Taiwanese society, which is dominated by heterosexism and monogamy values, still believe that any intimate relationships other than conventional one-to-one monogamy are ＂wrong,＂ ＂sinful,＂ ＂promiscuous,＂ and ＂immoral,＂ regardless of any extradyadic sexual negotiation/ agreement made by both (or all) partners. The goal of this study was to stand in the mutual position and to have public attitudes toward any kinds of extradyadic intimate relationships collected such as NMR and conventional infidelity. Furthermore, the study broke down extra-dyadic relationships into ＂extradyadic sexual relationship＂ and ＂extradyadic emotional relationship,＂ and tried to examine whether attitudes toward these two forms of extradyadic relationship differ in background variables (which were gender, sexual orientation, dating experience, and relationship identity). 919 unmarried participants, aged 18 to 35, were sampled to analyze and collect the data with an aid of using self-edited NMR attitude scale. The questionnaire was posted on PTT, an online platform in Taiwan before two pilot studies were conducted and corrected. Processed by one-way multivariate analysis, the findings can be summarized as follows: 1. Men's attitudes toward sexually and emotionally extra-dyadic relationships are more open than those of women. 2. Homosexual participants' attitudes toward both sexual and emotional extradyadic relationships are more open than those of heterosexual participants'. 3. Participants without dating experiences were more open than participants with dating experiences regarding emotionally extradyadic relationships. 4. Relationship identity contributes to significant difference between participants' attitudes toward emotional and sexual relationships. The study is an exploratory research of public attitude toward NMR, and the results can serve as references for future studies.

1. 陳秀菁,吳麗娟,林世華(2004)。大學生的共依附特質、人際親密能力與親密感之相關研究。教育心理學報，36(2)，145-164。
   連結：
2. Allen, E. S.,Rhoades, G. K.(2008).Not all affairs are created equal: Emotional involvement with an extradyadic partner.Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy,34,51-65.
3. Barker, M.(2005).This is my partner, and this is my... partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,18(1),75-88.
4. Barker, M.,Langdridge, D.(2010).Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory.Sexualities,13(6),748-772.
5. Bem, S. L.(1993).The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
6. Blow, A. J.,Hartnett, K.(2005).Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,31(2),183-216.
7. Boekhout, B. A.,Hendrick, S. S.,Hendrick, C.(2003).Exploring infidelity: Developing the relationship issues scale.Journal of Loss and Trauma,8(4),283-306.
8. Conley, T. D.,Moors, A. C.,Matsick, J. L.,Ziegler, A.(2013).The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships.Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy,13(1),1-30.
9. Drigotas, S.,Barta, W.(2001).The cheating heart: Scientific explorations of infidelity.Current Directions in Psychological Science,10(5),177-180.
10. Duncombe, J.(ed.),Harrison, K.(ed.),Allan, G.(ed.),Marsden, D.(ed.)(2004).The State of Affairs: Explorations in Infidelity and Commitment.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Easton, D.,Hardy, J. W.(2009).The ethical slut: A practical guide to polyamory, open relation- ships &other adventures.Berkeley, CA:Celestial Arts.
12. Erikson, E. H.(1968).Identity: Youth and crisis.New York:Norton.
13. Gardiner, Judith K.(2004).Men, masculinities, and feminist theory. Handbook of studies on men and masculinities.London:Sage pub.
14. Hayes, B., Poole, C., & Streb, K. (Producers). (2010). [Television series]. In T. Gibbons (Executive Producer), Sister Wives. Lehi, Utah; Discovery Communications.
15. Hutzler, K. T.,Giuliano, T.A.,Herselman, J.R.,Johnson, S. M.(2016).Three’s a crowd: public awareness and (mis) perceptions of polyamory.Psychology & Sexuality,7(2),69-87.
16. LaSala, M.(2004).Extradyadic sex and gay male couples: Comparing monogamous and nonmonogamous relationships.Families in Society,85(3),405-412.
17. Lusterman, D. D.(2005).Helping children and adults cope with parental infidelity.Journal of clinical psychology,61(11),1439-1451.
18. Matsick, J. L.,Conely, T.D.,Ziegler, A.,Moors, A. C.,Rubin, J. D.(2013).Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships.Psychology & Sexuality,5(4),339-348.
19. Nasaw, D. (2012, January 20). Is it possible to have a happy open marriage? BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news.
20. Parsons, J. T.,Starks, T. J.,Dubois, S.,Grov, C.,Golub, S. A.(2011).Alternatives to monogamy among gay male couples in a community survey: Implications for mental health and sexual Risk.Archives of Sexual Behavior,42(2),303-312.
21. Sheff, E.(2005).Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity, and power.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,34(3),251-283.
22. Taormino, T.(2008).Opening up: A guide to creating and sustaining open relationships.San Francisco:Cleis Press.
23. Thompson, P.(1984).Emotional and Sexual Components of Extramarital Relations.Journal of Marriage and Family,43(1),35-42.
24. Zimmerman, K. J.(2012).Clients in sexually open relationships: Considerations for therapists.Journal of Feminist Family Therapy,24,272-289.
25. 王秀惠(2005)。高雄市，樹德科技大學。
26. 吳政洋(2013)。台北市，世新大學。
27. 宋孟玲(2009)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學。
28. 李宜蓉(2011)。台北市，實踐大學。
29. 沈蔓芳(2013)。台北市，世新大學。
30. 周素鳳（譯）,Giddens, A.(2003).親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾.台北:巨流.
31. 林育琪(2008)。台南市，國立台南大學。
32. 林明德(2010)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
33. 姚蘊慧(2005)。「第二現代」社會觀點下的親密關係。通識研究集刊，8，149-169。
34. 洪敏峰(2007)。高雄市，高雄師範大學。
35. 許幼如(1999)。新竹市，國立清華大學。
36. 許欣瑞(2014)。新北市，私立輔仁大學。
37. 許耿嘉(2012)。台北市，國立政治大學。
38. 許凱翔(2012)。台北市，國防大學。
39. 陳蕾如(2010)。高雄市，樹德科技大學。
40. 游美惠(2007).性別向度與台灣社會.台北市:巨流.
41. 游婉琪（2013 年 6 月 25 日）。大學生擇偶女看經濟、男看外表—民生戰線 。 聯合晚報 。取自http://city.udn.com/54543/4979374#ixzz4tAUKgSyg
42. 黃敬婷(2007)。新竹市，新竹教育大學。
43. 蔡伊婷(2009)。高雄市，高雄醫學大學。
44. 蔡明君(2011)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
45. 賴怡因(2008)。台南市，國立成功大學。
46. 蘇巧因(2008)。台北市，中國文化大學。