專科生死亡體驗活動之遺囑撰寫作為生命意義實踐：存在現象學分析

The Writing of Wills for Death Experience Activities as the Practice of the Meaning for Life of College Students: An Existential Phenomenological Analysis

10.53106/181815462022054401001

鄭凰君(Huang-Chun Cheng)；劉淑慧(Shu-Hui Liu)

人倫和諧 ； 生命意義實踐 ； 死亡體驗 ； 存在現象學 ； 遺囑撰寫 ； existential phenomenology ； facing-death experience ； harmony in relationship ； life-meaning practice ； will writing

輔導與諮商學報

44卷1期（2022 / 05 / 01）

1 - 42

繁體中文

研究探討（1）死亡逼近下的感受、（2）遺囑之生命意義實踐，及（3）因死而生意義實踐之經驗結構。以存在現象學方法分析26份專四生參與死亡體驗活動所產生的遺囑與心得。遺囑內容呈現出兩結果、兩世界、兩面向之生命意義實踐：（1）完成意義實踐：完成此世存有，安頓此世自己（完成自我夢想與自我修練）、安頓此世人倫（完成或延續對父母之感謝、感恩和報恩，對朋友、戀人與手足之相互關懷；及時解開心結、完成感恩與彌補愧疚）、投入死後世界（安頓自己後事與修行；跨越生死兩界延續人倫）。（2）未完成意義實踐：此世遺憾（未能安頓自己－人生沒目標；未能安頓人倫－沒完整的家）、投入死後世界（寄望來生能安頓自己）。心得呈現出避開死與接受死兩趨向，前者僅部分出現因死而轉的意義實踐，後者全部出現。整體活動使人深刻體驗存有之可畏，繼而出現自我在苦中之移動，啟動生命意義轉化，展開向生向死之雙重意義實踐，承擔起自我命運與他人之苦的責任。本研究據此提出「因死與苦而生成之意義實踐：為我與為他之雙重開展」模式，並建議後續研究進一步具體化與精緻化。

The purpose of this study is to explore (a) feelings when facing death, (b) meanings practice for life, and (c) the experiential structure of the meaning practice induced by death. This study adopts the existential phenomenological approach to analyze wills and reflection-after-participation transcripts written by twenty-six college students who participated in an experiential activity of facing-death. The content of will transcripts indicates the practice of three dimensions with dual characteristics when the participants faced death: outcome (meaning transformation or not), worlds (being-in-this-life-world and the post-death world), and subjects (self and others). (1) Participants who presented the fulfillment of meaning conversion tried to establish harmony in relations not only with the two subjects but also in the two worlds. For themselves in being-in-this-life-world, participants arranged to care for themselves by fulfilling dreams and practicing self - improvement. Meanwhile, for others, practices adopted to care for persons who have had in this life world are as follows: being grateful for parents and paying a debt of gratitude; giving and enjoying mutual caring between siblings, friends, and lovers; and expressing apologies or regrets to those who have experienced harm and then tried to restore relationships. As for the post-death world, practices taken to deal with both the two subjects and the two worlds include making plans of their own funeral, afterlife spiritual practice, and arrangement of care for others across the worlds of life and death. (2) Individuals who failed to present thoughts related to meaning transformation showed regrets both for their lives and for relationships with others in being-in-this-life-world. Nevertheless, they still remained a glimmer of hope in the afterlife, such as finding their own goals of life in the afterlife. The results of reflection transcripts revealed two approaches to death: acceptance and avoidance. All individuals accepting death presented meaning transformation; however, only part of death-avoidance individuals described the transformation. In sum, the facing-death activity facilitates individuals to start a journal of the transformation of meaning for life: Participants profoundly experienced the awe of existence and the emerged suffering. Their selves are immersed in and moving among multiple modes of suffering. Individuals then start to unfold the meanings and started practices of life toward both the two subjects and the two worlds. Individuals assume responsibilities for their own life and others' suffering in harmony with their expectations. This study proposed a theoretical model based on research findings-the model of the meaning practice induced by facing death and suffering: A dual unfolding for oneself and others. It is recommended that the applications of this study and follow-up research are needed to enrich and refine the model.

1. 余德慧(2005)。華人心性與倫理的複合式療法。本土心理學研究，24，7-48。
   連結：
2. 余德慧(2012)。轉向臨終者主體樣態：臨終啟悟的可能。哲學與文化，39(12)，17-40。
   連結：
3. 余德慧,石世明,夏淑怡(2006)。探討癌末處境「聖世界」的形成。生死學研究，3，1-58。
   連結：
4. 余德慧,石世明,夏淑怡,王英偉(2006)。病床陪伴的心理機制：一個二元複合模式的提出。應用心理學，29，71-100。
   連結：
5. 李維倫,賴憶嫺(2009)。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。
   連結：
6. 林耀盛(2016)。行深：「臨床」、「臨終」、「治癒」和「療遇」交錯的人文徵候及其超越。本土心理學研究，46，195-237。
   連結：
7. 林耀盛,邱子芸(2015)。臨終處境的陪伴轉化：癌末病患及其照顧者心理經驗與存在現象探究。中華心理衛生學刊，28(2)，189-219。
   連結：
8. 翁士恆,彭榮邦(2018)。以「非我」為引探究受苦經驗與療癒實踐行動：從現象學取徑。中華心理衛生學刊，31(3)，253-274。
   連結：
9. 高榮孝(2018)。從海德格生命與苦難的關係反思尼特宗教交談實踐的可能性。新世紀宗教研究，16(4)，177-196。
   連結：
10. 陳珍德,程小蘋(2002)。癌症病人生命意義之研究。彰化師大輔導學報，23，1-48。
    連結：
11. 黃文宏(2016)。論海德格《存在與時間》中的良知與罪責。哲學與文化，43(7)，51-64。
    連結：
12. 黃秋韻(2009)。《中庸》「誠」觀念的主體性意義。哲學與文化，36(6)，135-155。
    連結：
13. 楊婉儀(2016)。從死與死亡的區分開展萊維納斯以倫理觀點對海德格存有論之批判：以《存在與時間》為例。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，54(3)，235-262。
    連結：
14. 劉淑慧,夏允中,王智弘,孫頌賢(2019)。自我及其在生活世界中的運作：從存在現象學處境結構觀之。中華輔導與諮商學報，55，1-25。
    連結：
15. 鄧小虎(2010)。人倫和基本益品。哲學與文化，37(5)，3-18。
    連結：
16. 釋永有,簡政軒(2012)。瀕死經驗個案後續效應之研究－以六位本土個案為例。生死學研究，14，59-92。
    連結：
17. Baumeister, R. F.,Landau, M. J.(2018).Finding the meaning of meaning: Emerging insights on four grand questions.Review of General Psychology,22(1),1-10.
18. Colosimo, K.,Nissim, R.,Pos, A. E.,Hales, S.,Zimmermann, C.,Rodin, G.(2018).Double awareness” in psychotherapy for patients living with advanced cancer.Journal of Psychotherapy Integration,28(2),125-140.
19. Frankl, V. E.(1967).Logotherapy and existentialism.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice,4(3),138-142.
20. George, L. S.,Park, C. L.(2016).Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions.Review of General Psychology,20(3),205-220.
21. George, L. S.,Park, C. L.(2016).The multidimensional existential meaning scale: A tripartite approach to measuring meaning in life.Journal of Positive Psychology,12(6),613-627.
22. Gillies, J.,Neimeyer, R. A.(2006).Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of meaning reconstruction in bereavement.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,19(1),31-65.
23. Greenberg, J.,Pyszczynski, T.,Soloman, S.(1986).The cause and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory.Public self and private self
24. Greenberg, J.,Solomon, S.,Pyszczynski, T.(1997).Terror management theory of selfesteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements.Advances in experimental social psychology
25. Greenberg, L. S.,Pascual-Leone, J.(2001).A dialectical constructivist view of the creation of personal meaning.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,14(3),165-186.
26. Greyson, B.(1992).Reduced death threat in near-death experiencers.Death Studies,16(6),523-536.
27. Greyson, B.(1983).The near-death experience scale. Construction, reliability, and validity.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,171,369-375.
28. Heidegger, M.王慶節（譯）,陳嘉映（譯）(2002).存在與時間.桂冠.
29. Huta, V.(2017).Meaning as a subjective experience.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,30(1),20-25.
30. Leontiev, D.(2017).Converging paths toward meaning.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,30(1),74-81.
31. Liu, S.,Hung, J.,Peng, H.,Chang, C.,Lu, Y.(2016).Virtue existential career model: A dialectic and integrative approach echoing eastern philosophy.Frontiers in Psychology,7(1761),1-15.
32. Medlock, G.(2017).Seeking consensual understanding of personal meaning: Reflections on the meaning summit at first congress on the construction of personal meaning.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,30(1),1-13.
33. Neimeyer, R. A.(2016).Meaning Reconstruction in the Wake of Loss: Evolution of a Research Program.Behaviour Change,33(2),65-79.
34. Noyes, R.,Fenwick, P.,Holden, J. M.,Christian, S. R.(2009).Aftereffects of pleasurable western adult near-death experiences.The handbook of near-death experiences: Thirty years of investigation
35. Park, C. L.(2010).Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events.Psychological Bulletin,136(2),257-301.
36. Park, C. L.,Folkman, S.(1997).Meaning in the context of stress and coping.Review of General Psychology,1(2),115-144.
37. Park, C. L.,George, L. S.(2018).Lab and field-based approaches to meaning threats and restoration: Convergences and divergences.Review of General Psychology,22(1),73-84.
38. Passmore, H. -A.,Howell, A. J.(2014).Eco-existential positive psychology: Experiences in nature, existential anxieties, and well-being.The Humanistic Psychologist,42(4),370-388.
39. Pyszczynski, T.,Greenberg, J.,Solomon, S.(1999).A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory.Psychological Review,106(4),835-845.
40. Pyszczynski, T.,Greenberg, J.,Solomon, S.,Arndt, J.,Schimel, J.(2004).Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review.Psychological Bulletin,130(3),435-468.
41. Sokolowsk, R.,李維倫（譯）(2004).現象學十四講.心靈工坊.
42. Solomon, S.,Greenberg, J.,Pyszczynski, T.(1991).A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews.Advance in Experimental Social Psychology,24,93-159.
43. Wong, P. T. P.(2010).Meaning therapy: An integrative and positive existential psychotherapy.Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy,40,85-93.
44. Wong, P. T. P.(2010).What is existential positive psychology?.International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy,3,1-10.
45. Wong, P. T. P.(Ed.)(2012).The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications.Routledge.
46. 方俊凱,李佩怡(2008)。癌症末期併憂鬱症病人之心理治療：存在－認知模式初步建構。安寧療護雜誌，13(4)，411-430。
47. 余治平(2009)。儒家成己成性的哲學追求－以《中庸》之「誠」為中心。哲學與文化，36(11)，5-23。
48. 余德慧(2000)。臨終病人的事實處境：臨終的開顯。安寧療護雜誌，5(2)，29-32。
49. 余德慧,石佳儀(2003).生死學十四講.心靈工坊.
50. 吳秀碧,賀孝銘,羅崇誠(2003)。教育部專案計畫研究成果報告教育部專案計畫研究成果報告,教育部。
51. 李德材(2008)。海德格《存有與時間》與生命教育之哲學基礎初探－以本真性和非本真性存在為核心之探討。止善，4，145-173。
52. 汪文聖(2019).現象學作為一種實踐哲學：胡塞爾・海德格・鄂蘭的倫理、政治與宗教哲學.聯經.
53. 林薰香(2015)。論《存有與時間》的良知現象。揭諦，28，39-94。
54. 袁保新(1977)。憂懼心境在海德格基本存有學中的地位（下）。鵝湖月刊，20，29-33。
55. 陳榮華(2008)。海德格《時間與存有》的本真與非本真存在。哲學與文化，35(1)，57-69。
56. 陳榮華(2017).海德格存有與時間闡釋.國立臺灣大學出版中心.
57. 勞思光(2002).新編中國哲學史.三民.
58. 楊祖漢(1992).儒家的心學傳統.文津.
59. 楊婉儀(2017).死．生存．倫理：從列維納斯的觀點談超越與人性的超越.聯經.
60. 劉君莉(2018)。向「死」而「生」何以可能？－儒耶比較視閾下對「死亡」問題之探究及其意義尋求。哲學與文化，45(6)，177-194。
61. 劉振維(2011)。由周敦頤論「誠」看宋明理學詮釋先秦儒學的蘊義暨其所開展的新氣象。止善，10，87-118。
62. 劉淑慧(2018)。劉淑慧（2018.12.07-08）：生涯作為倫理實踐：安身立命之辯證開展〔主題演講言語、意義與行動：華人倫理實踐論壇。
63. 劉淑慧,白倩如,洪瑞斌,王智弘,黃宗堅,蔡素琴(2019)。科技部專題研究計劃之結案報告科技部專題研究計劃之結案報告,科技部。
64. 蔡仁厚(1987).儒家思想的現代意義.文津.
65. 盧怡任,劉淑慧(2015)。處境結構分析：藉由語義學分析與反思抵達存有學理解。教育與心理研究，38(2)，31-57。