Mosston包含式教學對國小桌球學習效果之研究

The Effects of Mosston's Inclusion Style on Table Tennis Learning in Elementary School

10.29874/JPENTU.201106.0004

洪進益(Chin-Yi Hung)；陳玉枝(Yuh-Chih Chen)

Mosston教學光譜 ； 桌球 ； 包含式 ； 學習效果 ； Mosston physical education teaching spectrum ； table tennis ； inclusion style ； learning effects

臺東大學體育學報

14期（2011 / 06 / 01）

53 - 85

繁體中文

The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of inclusion style among the third grade students, and to examine the decision making of the students. The participants were 22 students, with 13 males and 9 females. who were in the third grade in a primary school and took part in 8 lessons of table tennis teaching. The quantitative data were collected by cognitive test, affective test, objective and subjective table tennis backhand block skill and analyzed by paired-samples t-test and ANCOVA. The qualitative data were collected by criteria sheets, teaching journals, videotaping, and semi-structured interviews. The results were as follows:(1) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on cognitive test for all students(t = -5.91，p＜.05), male students(t = -4.16，p＜.05) and female students(t = -4.13，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (2) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on affective test for all students(t = -4.32， p＜.05), male students(t = -3.42，p＜.05) and female students(t = -2.50，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (3) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on objective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -6.07，p＜.05), male students(t = -3.70，p＜.05) and female students(t = -5.97，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (4) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on subjective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -8.61，p＜.05), male students(t = -7.90，p＜.05) and female students(t = -5.45，p＜.05), but showed significant differences between male and female students(F=11.986，p＜.05). The male students was superior to the female students. (5) Most of the students chose their tasks according to difficult levels, and they tended to choose the easiest one first. When they were given the opportunity to choose another tasks, the students would change the order of their choices according to the challenge of the tasks. When they faced difficulties, they never gave up and continued to take the challenge. The conclusions were as follows: Mosston's inclusion style was an effective teaching method. It suited both male and female students, focused on the individual differences of students, and students feel interested in learning it.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of inclusion style among the third grade students, and to examine the decision making of the students. The participants were 22 students, with 13 males and 9 females. who were in the third grade in a primary school and took part in 8 lessons of table tennis teaching. The quantitative data were collected by cognitive test, affective test, objective and subjective table tennis backhand block skill and analyzed by paired-samples t-test and ANCOVA. The qualitative data were collected by criteria sheets, teaching journals, videotaping, and semi-structured interviews. The results were as follows:(1) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on cognitive test for all students(t = -5.91，p＜.05), male students(t = -4.16，p＜.05) and female students(t = -4.13，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (2) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on affective test for all students(t = -4.32， p＜.05), male students(t = -3.42，p＜.05) and female students(t = -2.50，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (3) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on objective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -6.07，p＜.05), male students(t = -3.70，p＜.05) and female students(t = -5.97，p＜.05), but showed no significant differences between male and female students. (4) After the inclusion style table tennis teaching, there were significant learning effects on subjective table tennis backhand block skill for all students(t = -8.61，p＜.05), male students(t = -7.90，p＜.05) and female students(t = -5.45，p＜.05), but showed significant differences between male and female students(F=11.986，p＜.05). The male students was superior to the female students. (5) Most of the students chose their tasks according to difficult levels, and they tended to choose the easiest one first. When they were given the opportunity to choose another tasks, the students would change the order of their choices according to the challenge of the tasks. When they faced difficulties, they never gave up and continued to take the challenge. The conclusions were as follows: Mosston's inclusion style was an effective teaching method. It suited both male and female students, focused on the individual differences of students, and students feel interested in learning it.

1. Beckett, K. D.(1990).The effects of two teaching styles on college students' achievement of selected physical education outcomes.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,10(2),153-169.
2. Byra, M.、Jenkins, J.(1998)。The thoughts and behaviors of learners in the inclusion style of teaching。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，18，26-42。
3. Byra, M.、Jenkins, J.(2000)。Matching instrucational tasks to learner ability: the inclusion style of teaching。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance，71(3)，26-30。
4. Chatoupis, C.、Emmanuel, C.(2003)。Teaching physical education with the inclusion style-The case of a Greek elementary school。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance，74(8)，33-38。
5. Goldberger, M.、Gerny, P.(1982)。The effect of three styles of teaching on the psychomotor performance and social skill development of fifth grade children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport，53(2)，116-124。
6. Mosston, M.、Ashworth, S.(2002)。Teaching physical education。Columbus, OH:Charles E. Merrill。
7. 王宗進(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
8. 吳佳玲(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
9. 吳萬福(1992)。體育教學的心理。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。
10. 林博仁、邱秀貞、黃清雲(2007)。桌球創意教學─運動教育模式。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，6(1)，26-33。
11. 邱仕友(1988)。桌球運動技術測驗之研究。復興崗學報，39，417-441。
12. 張春秀(2000)。從應用研究成果談未來體育教學改革的方向。中華體育季刊，13(4)，9-13。
13. 教育部(2007)。學校體育教材教法與評量。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心。
14. 教育部(2008)。教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要健康與體育學習領域。臺北市：教育部。。臺北市:教育部。
15. 許義雄(2003)。遊戲是體育的種子。學校體育雙月刊，13(1)，114-128。
16. 陳五洲譯、Jerry, R .T.、Nelson, J. K.(2003)。運動研究法。臺中市:華格那。
17. 陳星如(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
18. 陳美卿(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
19. 葉菁華(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
20. 蔡貞雄(1994)。體育教學的意義和本質。國民體育季刊，23(3)，3-6。
21. 鄧正忠(1999)。Mosston's 直接教學形式對網球技術教學效果之研究。宜蘭技術學報，2，83-98。

1. 陳玉枝、吳淑慎(2016)。Mosston 包含式教學融入理解式球類教學法對國小法式滾球學習成效之研究。台東大學體育學報，24，1-32。