不同校隊籃球選手喜歡的教練領導行為之研究

Preferences of Varsity Basketball Players from Various Schools toward the Coaching Behavior of Their Coaches

10.6194/SCS.2005.05.13

賴世堤(Shi-Ti Lai)

籃球 ； 教練 ； 領導行為 ； Basketball ； Coach ； Coaching Behavior

運動教練科學

5期（2005 / 04 / 01）

161 - 170

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討不同校隊籃球教練之領導行為，並瞭解不同背景變項的籃球選手，對教練領導行為的喜歡程度之差異。以不同校隊673名籃球選手為研究對象，採自編之「運動教練領導行為量表」為研究工具進行調查。所獲得之資料，經單因子多變項變異數分析(one-way MANOVA)及薛費氏檢定法(Scheffe's method)等統計方法處理，結果發現： 一、不同背景變項的籃球選手對教練領導行為的喜歡程度，性別、年齡、組別、訓練年數、練習天數和最高成就等變項在各不同的行為向度均呈顯著差異。 二、男選手、15-17歲、高中（職）選手，每週練習6天以上選手和國家代表隊選手，對教練領導行為有較高的喜歡程度。 三、各行為向度之喜歡程度，以「團隊行為」最高，「訓練與指導行為」次之，「專制行為」最低。

This research investigated the coaching behavior of basketball coaches of varsity teams from different schools in Taiwan. The purpose is to understand the effects of athletes' backgrounds on their preferences toward their respective coaches. Survey samples included 673 varsity team players from different schools. ”Scale for the leading behavior of sports coaches”, which was developed by ourselves, was used in this investigation. Data obtained were analyzed with one-way MANOVA and Scheffe's method. The following results were obtained: 1. ”Gender”, ”age”, ”group”, ”training years”, ”practice frequency”, and ”best achievement” have significant effect on all dimensions of the preference behavior. 2. Higher degree of coach-preferences were observed with male players, players aged 15-17, high school players, national team players, as well as players who practice more than six days per week. 3. In terms of different aspects of coaching behavior, ”team behavior” gets the highest preferences while ”training and instruction behavior” follows. ”Autocratic behavior” was least preferred.

1. Chelladurai, P.(1978).Canada,University of Waterloo.
2. Chelladurai, P.,Carron. A. V.(1981).Applicability to youth sports of the leadership scale for sports.Perceptual and Motor Skills,53,361-362.
3. Chelladurai. P.(1984).Discrepancy between preferences and perception of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports.Journal of Sport Psychology,6,27-41.
4. Chelladurai. p.,R. N. Singer. (Eds.),M. Murphey. (Eds.),L. K. Tennant (Eds.)(1993).Handbook of research on sport psychology.New York:Macmillan.
5. Chelladurai. P.,Saleh, S. D.(1978).Preferred leadership in sports.Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences,3,85-92.
6. Erle. F. J.(1981).London Canada,University of Western Ontario.
7. Home. T.,Carron. A. V.(1985).Compatibility in coach-athlete relationships.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,137-149.
8. Weiss. M. R.,Freidrichs, W. D.(1986).The influence of leader behaviors, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,8,332-346.
9. 王文科(1999)。教育研究法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
10. 余瑞華(2001)。臺中市，國立臺灣體育學院體育研究所。
11. 徐武雄(1996)。我國大專籃球教練壓力來源之研究。體育與運動，99，41-48。
12. 陳玉娟(1985)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
13. 陳榮章(1987)。我國籃球運動發展之研究。臺南家專學報，16，117-128。
14. 劉衡江(1999)。再創我國大專籃球聯賽新紀元。大專體育，45，7-8。
15. 鄭志富(1987)。運動教練領導行為研究論文集。臺北:師大書苑。
16. 鄭志富、方明營(1984)。大專院校足球教練領導行為之研究。臺北:漢文書局。
17. 蕭嘉惠、黃明玉(1998)。多元領導模式驗證研究－以花蓮縣大專院校為例。體育學報，25，71-80。
18. 賴世堤(2001)。大專田徑選手偏好的教練頜導行為之研究。國立臺灣體育學院學報，9，91-103。

1. 邱炳坤、王俊傑、王元聖(2014)。跆拳道選手心理資本與教練領導行為對滿意度之影響。運動教練科學，33，51-65。