排球自由防守球員與一般球員在背景變項、專項體能與防守效益之比較研究

A Study of Background, Volleyball-Related Physical Fitness and Defensive Effectiveness between Volleyball Libero Defensive Players and General Players

10.6194/SCS.2007.09.14

楊振興(Chen-Hsing Yang)

高中排球甲級聯賽 ； 接發球 ； 救球 ； 背景變項 ； 防守效益 ； Senior High School Volleyball League Games ； serve receiving ； dig ； background ； defensive effectiveness

運動教練科學

9期（2007 / 12 / 01）

141 - 151

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解一般球員及自由防守球員在背景變項、排球專項體能測驗成績、以及防守效益之差異情形，並進一步比較排球專項體能與防守效益之關聯程度。本研究以94學年度高中排球甲級聯賽男子組決賽成績前四強隊伍，即華僑、高英、福誠、內湖球員共35名爲研究對象。並以彙整相關文獻自編之研究工具「排球專項體能測驗暨紀錄表」測得其專項體能，並以「排球防守紀錄統計表」，記錄四強隊伍於高中排球甲級聯賽之準決賽及決賽四場比賽中，各隊球員之防守表現。之後，以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、卡方檢定、積差相關等進行資料統計分析，所得結果如下：一、在身高上，一般球員與自由防守球員有顯著差異；但在年齡、體重、慣用手上，一般球員與自由防守球員則無顯著差異。二、一般球員與自由防守球員在專項體能測驗成績的差異上，自由防守球員在敏捷性與彈跳力上顯著優於一般球員，但在速度、上肢肌力、耐力、柔軟度上，兩者則無顯著差異。三、在防守效益的差異上，自由防守球員在接發球與救球之防守效益高於一般球員，而在接扣球的防守效益上則無顯著差異。四、球員之彈跳力與接發球呈現中度相關，而球員之速度、彈跳力及敏捷性越佳者，則救球防守效益越高。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of background variables, volleyball-related physical fitness and defensive effectiveness between libero defensive players and general players. Furthermore, the study also investigated the correlations between volleyball-related physical fitness and defensive effectiveness. The subjects of this study were 35 male volleyball players selected from the top four teams which played at the Finals of Senior High School Volleyball League Games in 2005. By using ”Tests of Volleyball-Related Physical Fitness,” the data of volleyball-related physical fitness was recoded. And ”Observation Formula of players' defensive effectiveness” was used to record the performance of players' defensive effectiveness. The data were then analyzed by descriptive statistics, one-sample t-test, chi-square test, and product-moment correlation. The results were as follows: 1. There were significant differences in height between libero defensive players and general players, but there were no significant differences in age, weight and habitual hand between them. 2. Libero defensive players performed significantly superior in agility and jumping than general players. However, no significant differences were found in speed, muscular strength of upper body, muscular endurance and body flexibility between them. 3. Libero defensive players had significantly better defensive effectiveness in serve receiving and digging than general players, but no significant differences of defensive effectiveness in spike receiving were found. 4. Players' jumping abilities were moderately correlated with the abilities in serve receiving. Besides, the better speed, jumping ability and agility players had, the better they performed in digging effectiveness.

1. 王夢英(2004)。高中女子排球自由球員之接發球及防守效益之研究。通識教育年刊，6，201-220。
   連結：
2. 吳福明、王宗騰(2004)。2002年男子世界排球錦標賽自由球員接發球與防守表現之研究。大專體育學刊，6(1)，163-168。
   連結：
3. Eom, H. J.,Schutz, R. W.(1992).Statistical analyses of volleyball team performance.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63(1),11-18.
4. 安琪(2000)。論“自由人”在排球比賽中的應用。中國體育科技，36(3)，24-25、42。
5. 余清芳、黎玉東(2002)。自由球員對排球運動影響之研究。大專體育，62，64-68。
6. 林建成(2003)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系。
7. 胡啟林(2001)。排球規則帶來新變化。湖北體育科技，3(20)，38-41。
8. 倪偉(2000)。從排球規則的變化看自由防守運動員在比賽中的作用。中國體育科技，36(9)，22-23。
9. 張木山(1996)。排球。國立體育學院教練研究所技術報告書。
10. 張振興(2004)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系碩士班。
11. 莊清泉(1999)。1999年增修訂排球規則探析。大專排球研究論集，5，143-157。
12. 陳少堅(2001)。自由防守人的職責和區域概念。中國排球，6，42。
13. 陳海輝(2004)。排球“自由人”選材初探。株洲工學院學報，18(2)，156-158。
14. 陳進發(2002)。台中市，國立臺灣體育學院體育研究所。
15. 褚斌、鐘衛紅(2001)。對我國男子排球甲A聯賽“自由人”現狀的研究。中國體育科技，37，86-87。
16. 劉宗德(2002)。大專男排自由球員技術表現分析之研究。台北市:文景書局。
17. 劉買如(2000)。淺析排球比賽中的“自由防守隊員”。湖北體育科技，1，29-31。
18. 劉曙亮(2002)。新規則透視－析“自由人”在排球比賽中的作用。體育與科學，23(4)，54-55.34。
19. 劉獻國(2002)。我國男子排球比賽自由人傳位技術現狀分析。中國體育科技，38(12)，35-36.47。
20. 謝春霞(2001)。高校排球比賽中自由防守隊員的作用。上海體育學院學報，25(5)，109-110。