划船測功儀對大學男生有氧能力評估之探討

The Use of Rowing Ergometer to Evaluate the Aerobic Capacity of Male College-Aged Adults

10.6194/SCS.2010.18.03

鍾雨純(Yu-Chun Chung)；陳麗玉(Hung-Yu Chang)；陳竑廷(Hung-Ting Chen)；吳慧君(Huey-June Wu)

攝氧峰值 ； 最大換氣量 ； Bruce protocol ； 划船測功儀 ； VO2max) ； VEmax ； Bruce protocol ； rowing ergometer

運動教練科學

18期（2010 / 06 / 01）

27 - 36

繁體中文

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p＜.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p＜.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using rowing ergometer to measure maximum aerobic capacity, as well as to compare the maximum aerobic capacity measured by rowing ergometer and treadmill. The subjects were 18 college-aged adults who engaged in regular exercise (aged 22±1.8yr, height 173.2±3.4 cm, weight 65.6±7.3 kg). The subjected were randomly divided into two groups by using a counterbalanced design. Subjects in group A were tested by using treadmill in the first test and using rowing ergometer in the second test. Subjects in group B were tested in a reversed order. Three days of rest was given between the first and the second test. Bruce protocol was used in the treadmill test, while in the rowing ergometer test, the rowing frequency was set at 30 per min with wind speed level 5, and the starting load was set at 50W and progressively increased by 30W every 3 min. The Mobile wireless metabolic analyzer Meta Max was used to measure the aerobic capacity in both the treadmill and rowing test. Data were analyzed by using paired t-test and the α level was set at .05. The result revealed that the VO(subscript 2max)(9.48±5.45 vs. 44.15±4.33 ml•kg^(-1)•min^(-1), p＜.05) and VE(subscript max) (122.17±18.1vs. 105.68±14.72 L•min^(-1), p＜.05) obtained from the treadmill test were significantly higher than the rowing ergometer. It was concluded that because of the exercise mode of the treadmill, the aerobic capacity measured by using treadmill is more valid than rowing ergometer. However, because of the relative convenience and low cost of the rowing ergometer, it is suggested that the aerobic capacity measured by treadmill protocol can be used as the criterion variable to develop a regression equation for rowing ergometer.

1. 王錠堯、王順正(2004)。心肺恢復指數與最大攝氧量的相關研究。體育學報，37，91-102。
   連結：
2. Brahler, C. J.,Blank, S. E.(1995).Versa Climbing elicits higher VO2max than does treadmill running or rowing ergometry.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,27(2),249-254.
3. Midgley, A. W.,Bentley, D. J.,Luttikholt, H.,McNaughton, L. R.,Millet, G. P.(2008).Challenging a dogma of exercise physiology: Does an incremental exercise test for valid VO2max determination really need to last between 8 and 12 minutes?.Sports Medicine,38(6),441-447.
4. Riechman, S. E.,Zoeller, R. F.,Balasekaran, G, Goss, F. L.,Robertson, R. J.(2002).Prediction of 2000m indoor rowing performance using a 30s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake.Journal of Sports Science,20,681-687.
5. Rosiello, R. A.,Mahler, D. A.,Ward, J. L.(1987).Cardiovascular responses to rowing.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,19(3),239-245.
6. Smith, T. B.,Hopkins, W. G.,Tayior, N. A.(1994).Respiratory responses of elite oarsmen, former oarsmen, and highly trained non-rowers during rowing, cycling and running.European Journal of Applied Physiology,69(1),44-49.
7. 王于卿、郭明珠、廖敏君、陳麒旭、陳坤檸(1998)。體表面積與預估最高攝氧量研究。大專院校87年度體育學術研討會刊
8. 吳慧君(2006)。運動能力的生理學評定（增訂版）。臺北市:師大書苑。
9. 林信甫(2005)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
10. 洪振滄(2001)。桃園縣，元智大學。
11. 彭坤郎(2005)。桃園縣，國立臺灣體育大學。
12. 黃榮松(1997)。最大有氧能力測驗的信度與效度探討。中華體育季刊，10(4)，42-50。

1. 黃詩涵,陳德盛,張嘉澤,侯碧燕(2021)。柔道專項訓練模式與划船測功儀訓練模式之強度相關研究。臺灣體育學術研究，71，73-92。
2. 蕭敬衡、陳佳慧、張嘉澤(2012)。低氧環境對於2000m划船測功儀負荷之生理反應與運動表現之影響。臺灣體育學術研究，53，113-126。