羽球混合雙打比賽戰術分析

The Analysis of Tactical Type in the Mixed Double of Badminton

10.6194/SCS.2011.21.04

紀世清(Shyh-Ching Chi)；姚漢禱(Han-Dau Yau)

女前男後模式 ； 前後左右輪轉模式 ； 類別統計 ； 評分者信度 ； badminton ； mixed doubles ； tactical type ； rater reliability

運動教練科學

21期（2011 / 03 / 01）

41 - 56

繁體中文

目的：探討羽球混合雙打的比賽戰術。方法：研究對象為2009年東亞運羽球項目混合雙打前八強的7場比賽。以現場錄影，賽後五位評分者觀察三種常用的比賽戰術，利用類別統計分析戰術型態。結果：一、評分者一致性信度0.99。二、女前男後模式出現率59.11%和得分率56.26%皆最高，它是羽球混雙最主要、且高得分的戰術；前後左右輪轉模式得分率56.00%雖高、但出現率少(20.33%)，它是轉守為攻的重要戰術。三、「選手組」、「比賽戰術」、「得失分」獨立性考驗得到G平方128.86，達到.05顯著水準，即此三個變項有相關，進一步分析顯示：各選手組別和所使用的比賽戰術、以及比賽戰術和得失分有關聯存在。四、選手組個別戰術分析發現：成績表現優異者其攻擊戰術的女前男後模式，以及轉守為攻戰術的前後左右輪轉模式都要有較高的得分率。結論：羽球混合雙打比賽戰術以女前男後模式的攻擊戰術為主，輔以前後左右輪轉模式的轉守為攻戰術。

The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the techniques and tactics used by mixed doubles players. Text analysis method and matches score records analysis, which were used in this study. The data were collected from the mixed doubles quarter finalists in 2009 East Asian Games Badminton series. There were seven games, seventeen sessions, in total. Chi-square test was used for statistics, to investigate skills and tactics within players and the relations between the points gained/lost and tactics. Results were as follows: 1. Chi-square test of overall skills and points gained/lost was 1631.319 (p＜.05). It was shown that there were significant differences between each skill and points. The Cramer's V was 0.515. It indicated that skills and points gained/lost had significant relationship. 2. Chi-square test of teams and tactics was 145.86 (p＜.05). It indicated the tactics used by each teams was difference. The Cramer's V was 0.108, shown that teams and tactics didn't have significant relationship. In conclusion, from our results, we suggest that mixed doubles' skills and tactics were mainly in attacks.

1. 紀世清、彭俊秀、姚漢禱(2010)。羽球單打比賽戰術類型研究之效度與信度。休閒運動健康評論，1(2)，33-43。
   連結：
2. 盧正崇、呂芳陽(2010)。羽球混合雙打技、戰術趨勢解析。大專體育，109，59-65。
   連結：
3. Wikipedia (2009). Badmiton. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badminton
4. Kumekawa, E.(1996).Badminton Strategies and Tactics for the Novice and Recreational Player.Retrieved January 27,2009, from http://web.archive.org/web/20070126195758/http://www.badmintonplanet.com/cgi-bin/playbetter/strategies.html
5. Campbell, A(1990).Teach Yourself Badminton.Kent UK:Hodder and Stoughton.
6. Davis, P(1988).Play the Game Badminton.London:Ward Lock.
7. Safrit, M. J.(Ed.),Wood, T. M.(Ed.)(1989).Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science.Champaign:Human Kinetics Publishers.
8. 李森(2005)。中國羽毛球男雙與國外優秀選手發接發技戰術的比較研究。武漢體育學院學報，39(6)，84-86。
9. 姚漢禱(1983)。桌球運動技術系統分析。現代體育，19，36-42。
10. 洪欣正、楊繼美(2003)。羽球混合雙打戰術運用之探討。淡江體育，6，126-132。
11. 紀世清(2002)。羽球訓練指南。臺北市:師大書苑有限公司。
12. 凌躍(1994)。提高羽毛球混合雙打技術與意識的訓練方法。中國體育科技，3，34-38。
13. 教育部體育大辭典編訂委員會(1984)。體育大辭典。臺北市:台灣商務印書館股份有限公司。
14. 廖威彰、莊國上(2007)。羽球混合雙打“強弱”組合的基本打法與戰術探討。交大體育，3，93-97。
15. 樊正治(1980)。羽球指引（修訂一版）。臺北市:台灣商務印書館股份有限公司。

1. 陸雲鳳(2016)。利用評分者差異函數偵測主觀評分之議題。運動教練科學，43，17-24。
2. 呂子平,何炘澄,王志全(2019)。羽球運動技戰術分析文獻之回顧。交大體育學刊，15，34-40。
3. (2024)。羽球競賽資料文獻分析與實務訓練應用。運動表現期刊，11(2)，129-145。