羽球混合雙打比賽擊球技術分析

The Analysis of Rally Skills of Games in Mixed Doubles for Badminton

10.6194/SCS.2011.23.01

紀世清(Shyh-Ching Chi)；王家閔(Chia-Min Wang)；姚漢禱(Han-Dau Yau)

證明測驗內容效度 ； 混合雙打 ； 擊球技術 ； evidence test content validity ； mixed doubles ； rally skills

運動教練科學

23期（2011 / 09 / 01）

1 - 14

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討東亞運羽球男女混合雙打選手比賽擊球技術。研究對象為2009年東亞運羽球項目男女混合雙打前八強的選手，共7場的賽事，以卡方考驗和t考驗分析擊球技術，並質性評價個別的擊球技術，本研究結果得到：一、研究工具證明具有優異的測驗內容效度，評分者一致性信度91.6%。二、擊球技術與得失分卡方考驗達到顯著水準，表示各項擊球技術的得失分有明顯的差異；其次，克拉瑪V係數(Cramer''''s V)0.52，也表示得失分與技術有顯著相關。三、比較選手組得失分，t考驗結果兩組顯著差異：冠軍組t值－2.92、得分顯著大於失分，8號選手組t值2.17、即失分顯著大於得分。四、冠亞軍群組六項得分技術皆在平均之上，7號選手組以殺球攻擊為主，3號選手組則是積極主動的撲球技術得分；第三名群組1號選手組得分技術比較均衡，而5號選手組在殺球和撲球表現突出，但推球和切球略顯不足；第五名群組隊伍的得分技術皆在平均之下，特別是殺球的差距最大。本研究結論為羽球混合雙打的比賽擊球技術以攻擊的得分技術為主。

This study aimed to explore the rally skills of games in mixed doubles for badminton in the East Asian Games. The objects of this study were badminton quarter finalists who competed into final top eight in the 2009 East Asian Games. In a total of seven games, Chi-square test and t-test were used to analyze the rally skills, and then the quality evaluation was applied to individual rally skills. The findings of this study showed that (1) Evidence test content validity was excellent, and the reliability of Raters' consistency was 91.6%. (2) The Chi-square test to achieve a significance level for rally skills and points gained/lost; it manifests that points gained/lost of rally skills of each variable were significantly different; Furthermore, Cramer's V coefficient was 0.52, and it also indicated that points gained/lost and skills were significantly correlated. (3) In comparison of players, the two groups were significantly different in t-test; the t-value of the group of championship was-2.92, whose points gained was significantly greater than their points loss; the t-value of player group No. 8 was 2.17, meaning their points loss were great then the points gained. (4) The scores of skills in six variables for the best rank sets perform all above the average; group No.7, players mostly used overhead smash in the game; group No.3, players took the initiative to save balls to score in skill. In rank third sets, group No.1, players score evenly in every skill; group No.5, players remarkably perform in the variable of overhead smash and save ball, but poorly in items of pushball and undercut. The rank fifth sets perform under the average in variables of score skills, especially in overhead smash, which was the greatest in difference. The conclusion of this study is on scores of attack skills in variables of rally skills of games in mixed doubles for badminton.

1. American Educational Research Association,American Psychological Association,National Council on Measurement in Education(1999).The standards for educational and psychological testing.Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
2. Campbell, A.(1990).Teach yourself badminton.Sevenoaks:Hodder and Stoughton.
3. Davis, P.(1988).Play the game badminton.London:Ward Lock.
4. 林文煌(2006)。羽球新制的變革及未來性的探討。福爾摩沙體育學刊，1，33-38。
5. 侯加昌(1991)。羽毛球快、狠、準、活與穩的關係。羽毛球網球雜誌
6. 洪欣正、楊繼美(2003)。羽球混合雙打戰術運用之探討。淡江體育，6，126-132。
7. 紀世清(2002)。羽球訓練指南。臺北市:師大書苑。
8. 凌躍(1994)。提高羽毛球混合雙打技術與意識的訓練分析。中國體育科技，3(30)，34-37。
9. 費英(2006)。淺析羽毛球21賽制對比賽的影響。遼寧體育科技，28(6)，64-69。
10. 黃世忠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育大學運動技術研究所。
11. 廖威彰、莊國上(2007)。羽球混合雙打“強弱＂組合的基本打法與戰術探討。交大體育，3，93-97。
12. 劉智英、鄭明輝(2009)。世界羽球男子雙打發球技術分析。湖北體育科技，28(1)，112-113。

1. 蔡玄俊、陳儷今、洪偉欽、李再立(2018)。單打與雙打青少年女子羽球選手專項步法敏捷力之差異研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，17(1)，53-63。
2. 黃全成,涂國誠,方介民(2019)。現今世界羽球混合雙打關鍵技戰術的發展趨勢。成大體育學刊，51(2)，84-106。
3. 劉佳哲、張碧峰、李敏華、冉卉芬(2017)。世界頂尖羽球混合雙打選手第三拍之技術分析。臺中科大體育學刊，13，160-172。
4. 陸雲鳳(2016)。利用評分者差異函數偵測主觀評分之議題。運動教練科學，43，17-24。
5. 呂子平,何炘澄,王志全(2019)。羽球運動技戰術分析文獻之回顧。交大體育學刊，15，34-40。
6. (2024)。羽球競賽資料文獻分析與實務訓練應用。運動表現期刊，11(2)，129-145。