跆拳道優秀選手與大專生運動視覺之比較

A Comparison Study of Sports Vision between Elite Taekwondo Contestants and University Student Athletes

10.6194/SCS.2012.25.04

劉妍秀(Yen-Hsiu Liu)；史麗珠(Lai-Chu See)；黃千綺(Chang-Chi Huang)；朱彥穎(Yan-Ying Ju)；張世聰(Shih-Tsung Chang)

運動視覺測量 ； 周邊視覺 ； 動體視力 ； 眼球運動 ； 瞬間視覺 ； peripheral awareness ； sports vision measurement ； dynamic visual acuity ； eye movement ； momentary vision

運動教練科學

25期（2012 / 03 / 01）

39 - 51

繁體中文

Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p ＞ .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p ＞ .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

1. 林宜親、李冠慧、宋玟欣、柯華葳、曾志朗、洪蘭、阮啟弘(2011)。以認知神經科學取向探討兒童注意力的發展和學習之關聯。教育心理學報，42(3)，517-541。
   連結：
2. 陳俊汕(2005)。運動視覺與選擇性注意的機轉及其在運動上的應用。大專體育，78，200-209。
   連結：
3. 彭譯箴、李雲光(2005)。籃球選手與大專生深度知覺之比較研究。北體學報，13，88-95。
   連結：
4. 彭譯箴、李雲光、謝素貞(2006)。不同種類運動選手深度知覺之比較研究。大專體育學刊，8(3)，89-98。
   連結：
5. 劉妍秀、朱彥穎、史麗珠、黃千綺、張榮三(2010)。運動視覺軟體量測之穩定性應用探討。運動教練科學，17，65-78。
   連結：
6. 劉妍秀、林逸錄、黃千綺、朱彥穎、張榮三、史麗珠(2011)。跆拳道選手與大專生深度知覺之比較：絕對及相對辨識的距離誤差。成大體育，43(2)，56-66。
   連結：
7. 劉雅甄(2008)。棒球選手動體視力與投打表現之相關研究。大專體育學刊，10(1)，89-98。
   連結：
8. 劉雅甄(2004)。年齡對動體視力發展之影響。大專體育學刊，6(3)，157-165。
   連結：
9. 劉雅甄(2006)。不同棒球球齡選手之動體視力發展特徵。體育學報，39(2)，41-49。
   連結：
10. 劉雅甄、王艾伶、鄭芳梵(2010)。開放式與閉鎖式運動選手動態視力之比較。運動研究，19(1)，131-140。
    連結：
11. 劉雅甄、林添鴻、林昌國(2007)。不同教育階段棒球和空手道運動員動體視力之比較。運動教練科學，8，133-139。
    連結：
12. Abernethy, B.(1987).Selective attention in fast ball sports. Ⅱ: Expert-novice differences.Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,19(4),7-15.
13. Beckerman, S.,Fornes, A. M.(1997).Effects of changes in lighting level on performance with the AcuVision 1000.Journal of the American Optometric Association,68(4),243-249.
14. Berger, A.,Jones, L.,Rothbart, M. K.,Posner, M. I.(2000).Computerized games to study the development of attention in childhood.Behavior Research Methods,32(2),297-303.
15. Buys, H.(2002).Johannesburg, South Africa,University of Rand Afrikaans.
16. Coffey, B.,Reichow, A. W.(1990).Optometric evaluation of the elite athlete: The pacific sports visual performance profile.Problems in Optometry,1(2),32-58.
17. Colombo, J.(2001).The development of visual attention in infancy.Annual Review of Psychology,52,337-367.
18. Ferreira, J. T.(2002).Sports vision as a hardware and software system.Eyesight,2002(July),40.
19. Loran, D. F. C.,Macewen, C. J.(1997).Sports Vision.Boston:Butterworth-Heinemann.
20. Ludeke, A.,Ferreira, J.(2003).The difference in visual skills between professional versus non-professional rugby players.The South African Optometrist,62(4),150-158.
21. Melcher, M. H.,Lund, D. R.(1992).Sports vision and the high school student athlete.Journal of the American Optometric Association,63(7),466-474.
22. Morris, G. S.,Kreighbaum, E.(1977).Dynamic visual acuity of varsity women volleyball and basketball players.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,48(2),480-483.
23. Sanderson, F. H.,Whiting, H. T.(1974).Dynamic visual acuity and performance in a catching task.Journal of Motor Behavior,6(2),87-94.
24. Weiss, A. D.(1965).The locus of reaction time change with set, motivation, and age.Journal of Gerontology,20(1),60-64.
25. 林明聲(1999)。運動視覺訓練法。臺南市:信宏。
26. 黃千綺(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，長庚大學復健科學研究所。
27. 劉強、王翔星、劉雅甄(2000)。棒球運動中的運動視覺。國立體育學院論叢，10(2)，203-220。
28. 劉強、鍾宇政、張德照(2000)。運動視覺之初探。大專體育，47，53-58。
29. 劉雅甄(2006)。動體視力在棒壘球選手訓練上的應用。國民體育季刊，35(4)，48-52。

1. 陳益祥、陳怡文(2015)。運動視覺與運動表現。運動表現期刊，2(1)，7-12。
2. 林耀豐,林彥男,林如瀚(2019)。網球選手在回擊球時的視覺行為分析。臺灣運動心理學報，19(2)，1-21。
3. 劉雅甄、劉妍秀、張世聰(2013)。軟式網球不同技能水準選手的運動視覺之比較。體育學報，46(3)，231-240。
4. 劉妍秀,寧玉麟,陳昱仁,張世聰,史麗珠(2019)。6週空手道訓練對10－11歲孩童深度知覺與周邊視覺之成效。運動教練科學，55，21-30。
5. 謝錦松、劉妍秀、寧玉麟、陳淑貞、張世聰(2016)。大專空手道選手之深度知覺。運動教練科學，42，73-80。