國際青少年男子網球選手影響比賽勝負之攻守技術分析

Effect of the Offence and Defense Technique on International Junior Male Tennis Players

10.6194/SCS.2013.31.02

簡瑞宇(Jui-Yu Chien)

青少年網球選手 ； 攻守技術因子 ； 贏球率 ； junior tennis player ； the offence and defense technique factors ； the percentage of points won

運動教練科學

31期（2013 / 09 / 01）

13 - 28

繁體中文

Purpose: The study was to examine the effects of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes among international junior male tennis players, and analyze the winners on each technique factors in Four Tennis Opens. Methods: Forty-one junior male's singles top16 tennis players ranking in 2012 Four Tennis Opens, including France Open, Wimbledon Championship, US Open and Australian Open, were subjects in this study. The study adopted Independent t test and one-way ANOVA as the statistical method. The remarkable standard established (α = .05). Result: First, Australian Open, the factors were Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (2, 15.5%, 5.8; p ＜ .05); France Open, the factors were double faults, unforced errors and total return points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (-1.3, -3.2, 13.2%; p ＜ .05); Wimbledon Championship, the factor is the percentage of second-serve points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (15.3%; p ＜ .05); US Open, the factors were the percentage of first-serve points won, Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (12.5%, 1.7, 16.8%, 5.8; p ＜ .05). Second, the winners' three technique factors in Four Tennis Opens have differences. The unforced errors per game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, France Open, and Australian Open. The performances of winners in each game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, and Australian Open. The performances of the second serve winning percentage are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, France Open, and Australian Open. Conclusion: Though the analysis of the effect of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes, the study discovered that the development of the second-serve was the key to victory when junior tennis players match in hard court (US Open, Australian Open) and grass court (Wimbledon Championship). Double faults and unforced errors in clay court (France Open) obviously affected the success and the failure of the competition. In conclusion, to reduce the serve errors and to promote the stability of serve were the key to win.

Purpose: The study was to examine the effects of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes among international junior male tennis players, and analyze the winners on each technique factors in Four Tennis Opens. Methods: Forty-one junior male's singles top16 tennis players ranking in 2012 Four Tennis Opens, including France Open, Wimbledon Championship, US Open and Australian Open, were subjects in this study. The study adopted Independent t test and one-way ANOVA as the statistical method. The remarkable standard established (α = .05). Result: First, Australian Open, the factors were Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (2, 15.5%, 5.8; p ＜ .05); France Open, the factors were double faults, unforced errors and total return points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (-1.3, -3.2, 13.2%; p ＜ .05); Wimbledon Championship, the factor is the percentage of second-serve points won. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (15.3%; p ＜ .05); US Open, the factors were the percentage of first-serve points won, Aces, the percentage of second-serve points won and winners. The winner's performance was better than the loser's (12.5%, 1.7, 16.8%, 5.8; p ＜ .05). Second, the winners' three technique factors in Four Tennis Opens have differences. The unforced errors per game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, France Open, and Australian Open. The performances of winners in each game are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, and Australian Open. The performances of the second serve winning percentage are in the order as Wimbledon Championship, US Open, France Open, and Australian Open. Conclusion: Though the analysis of the effect of the offence and defense technique factors on Four Tennis Opens outcomes, the study discovered that the development of the second-serve was the key to victory when junior tennis players match in hard court (US Open, Australian Open) and grass court (Wimbledon Championship). Double faults and unforced errors in clay court (France Open) obviously affected the success and the failure of the competition. In conclusion, to reduce the serve errors and to promote the stability of serve were the key to win.

1. 吳忠芳、李建平、郭世傑(2006)。網球單打比賽的生理學分析。運動生理暨體能學報，4，21-28。
   連結：
2. 李建平(2004)。國內優秀男子網球選手單打發球對比賽勝負關係之研究。體育學報，36，227-237。
   連結：
3. 邱豐傑(2010)。網球公開賽男子單打之技術型態。大專體育學刊，12(1)，83-95。
   連結：
4. 張碧峰、陳志榮(2009)。不同場地對男子職業網球選手發球與接發球技術之影響。體育學報，42(4)，29-42。
   連結：
5. 連玉輝(2009)。全方位強式網球（Complete Power Tennis）模式之補強。運動教練科學，13，1-31。
   連結：
6. 劉佳哲、張碧峰(2011)。優秀女子職業網球選手影響比賽勝負之技術因子分析。運動教練科學，24，25-41。
   連結：
7. Wimbledon. (2012). Boys singles draw. Retrieved August 8, 2012, from http://www.wimbledon.org
8. ATP. (2012). ATP Titles/Finals. Retrieved December 25, 2012, from http://www.atpworldtour.com
9. Fédération Française de Tennis (FFT). (2012). Boys singles draw. Retrieved June 26, 2012, from http://www.fft.fr/roland.garros/default_en.asp
10. 萬欣（2011，2月1日）。網壇力量化　新生代難出頭。資料引自http://mag.udn.com/mag/sports/printpage.jsp?f_ART_ID=300053
11. Tennis Australia. (2012). Junior boys singles draw. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.australianopen.com
12. United States Tennis Association (USTA). (2012). Junior boys singles draw. Retrieved September 18, 2012, from http://www.usopen.org
13. Austin, T.(2000)。打好回發球回報多多。國際網球雜誌，43，36-38。
14. Isaacs, L. D.,Finch, A. E.(1983).Anticipatory timing of beginning and intermediate tennis players.Perceptual and Motor Skills,57(2),451-454.
15. Morris, K.(1998).Boston, MA,School of Education, Boston University.
16. Overton, W.(1973).Tennis for women.New York:Doubleday.
17. Washington, M.(2001)。強勁的後座力。國際網球雜誌，44，58-59。
18. 李鑑芸(2007)。ATP男子網球技術分析。臺北縣:啟業。
19. 翁梓林(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
20. 張清泉(1988)。網球發球理論與技術研究。臺北市:體育。
21. 張凱隆(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學運動競技學系。
22. 陳智仁(1997)。網球場地表面性質對選手擊球得分技術之差異研究。南亞學報，17，141-165。
23. 黃僅喻(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學運動競技學系。
24. 劉中興(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學運動教練研究所。
25. 劉中興、羅宏仁(1999)。1997年美國網球公開賽各項戰況變數與比賽勝負之比較研究。大專體育，43，113-118。
26. 劉錦璋、張凱隆(2012)。網球發球優勢的意義與應用。屏東教大體育，15，221-229。
27. 謝侑達(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學運動競技學系。

1. 蔡文程(2019)。探討頂尖青少年網球選手影響勝負之技術因子關聯性－以世界青少年球王曾俊欣選手為例。臺灣體育學術研究，66，53-73。
2. 蔡忠昌、江勁彥、王怡靜(2016)。青少年網球選手擊球速度與排名之相關研究。運動教練科學，44，81-91。
3. 簡瑞宇(2015)。輪椅網球比賽勝負之技術分析―以2013年大滿貫男單選手為例。運動教練科學，38，1-15。
4. 簡瑞宇(2015)。網球技術因子對比賽勝負的影響及各因子之相關性研究－以大滿貫男單冠軍選手納達爾為例。臺灣體育學術研究，59，57-78。
5. 簡瑞宇(2016)。以灰色關聯度分析法探討網球技術因子之關連─以生涯金滿貫選手Serena Williams 為例。運動教練科學，42，91-110。
6. 簡瑞宇,蔡文程,黃俊發(2021)。女子網球雙打最佳贏球策略：以臺灣詹家姊妹為例。大專體育學刊，23(3)，277-292。
7. 簡瑞宇、陳志榮、張碧峰、王宏義(2014)。網球雙打比賽勝負之技術分析—以生涯金滿貫選手布萊恩兄弟為例陳志榮/國立體。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(1)，138-148。
8. 簡瑞宇、黃俊發(2017)。職業及青少年網球選手比賽勝負技術因子。大專體育學刊，19(1)，55-73。
9. 簡偉倫,黃僅喻,李建平,王鈞逸(2021)。新世代網球選手在短局賽制技術表現分析。臺中科大體育學刊，17，149-158。
10. 謝禮丞,黃僅喻(2021)。The Differential Performance of Tennis Professionals of Different Levels in Serve and Return Games。興大體育學刊，20，169-180。
11. (2024)。基於社會網路分析探討男女職業網球選手在四大滿貫賽中的表現。調查研究-方法與應用，52，1-29。