發展基植於人格特質的桌球技戰術前三板分析模型

Developing A Techniques and Tactics Analytic Model for Table Tennis-Based on Athlete Personality

10.6194/SCS.2015.40.09

劉熒潔(Ying-Chieh Liu)；王明月(Ming-Yueh Wang)；鄭智銓(Jhih-Chuan Jheng)

選才 ； 訓練 ； 比賽 ； selecting talents ； training ； competition

運動教練科學

40期（2015 / 12 / 01）

115 - 135

繁體中文

過去桌球分析方法中較少將戰術層面加以考量，本研究著重於桌球戰術的分析，並結合人格特質，建立桌球前三板技戰術分析模型。然後以2012年大專校院運動會桌球項目以及第十屆淡大盃桌球邀請賽乙組男性選手為研究對象，透過錄影的方式，紀錄各場比賽過程，然後在比賽後發放人格特質問卷，用以確認其人格特質，各取了堅韌型、理智型、自控型以及進取型10名，並分析其所使用的技戰術分析後，繪製出四種人格特質的勝敗模型，並根據模型分析提出教練選才、選手訓練以及比賽等建議。本研究獲得以下結論：一、本研究所提出的桌球前三板技戰術分析模型提供了桌球分析的一個新的領域，模型組成是由技術組合成戰術，此種分析方式希望能為桌球運動的訓練帶來更多不同面向的建議；二、本研究將人格特質結合桌球前三板技戰術分析模型，分析資料後，得知堅韌型選手可塑造成削球型選手及異質性球拍打法；理智型選手可塑造成全面性選手，如弧圈型、弧圈結合快攻型等打法；自控型選手戰術運用多變，可塑造成削攻型、弧圈結合快攻型等打法；進取型選手較積極主動，可塑造成兩面弧圈型及快攻型打法。

The analytic method of table tennis rarely considers the aspect of tactics. Also, past researchers seldom incorporate personality when they analyze the athlete's math. Thus, the purpose of this study is to build an analytic method of table tennis which includes tactics and personality. This study develops an ＂analytic model of table tennis of the first three hits＂ based on athletes' personality. We used table tennis athletes as our subjects from 2013 National College Athletic Game and the Tenth invitational tournament held by Tamkang University in Taiwan. Video camera records of each game were made and the personality survey was conducted after games. The videos were analyzed to build win and failure model by personality, and the advices of choosing athletes, training and competing were proposed. We conclude our study as follows: 1. ＂the analytic model of table tennis of the first three hits＂ provides a new aspect to analyze athletes' tactics in the match. We hope this new tool can bring about more different perspectives for better training of table tennis athletes; 2. we found that athletes with different personality can be shaped as different types of players. Such as athletes with steadfast personality can be trained as sliced and heterogeneous-bat players; athletes with rational personality can be shaped as comprehensive players; athletes with self-control personality can be trained as slice-attack, loop-drive combined with quick attack players. Athletes with aggressive personality can be shaped as both-side loop-drive and quick attack players.

1. 涂志賢(2000)。學校專任運動教練組織承諾與專業承諾之研究。體育學報，29，35-45。
   連結：
2. 鄭健民、蔡佳欣、紀世清(2013)。男子羽球雙打比賽戰術分析。運動教練科學，29，45-57。
   連結：
3. Raglin, J. S.(2001).Psychological factors in sport performance: The mental health model revisited.Sports Medicine,31,875-890.
4. Tohanean, D. I.,Chicomban, M.(2010).Personality and performance sport.Ovidius University Annals, Physical Education and Sport/Science, Movement and Health,10(2),609-613.
5. 李湛忠(2005)。淺談乒乓球戰術訓練。承德民族師專學報，25(2)，117-118。
6. 洪谷松(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林縣，國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所。
7. 郭春芍(1999)。大學生男生軟網運動員與非軟網運動員人格特質之比較研究。大專體育，46，108-115。
8. 陳進祥(2009)。桌球運動教練專業能力之探討。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，8(3)，282-292。
9. 楊欽城、張廖麗珠、蔡文程、徐志輝(2009)。人格特質、情緒智力對大專男子排球選手運動成績之預測。朝陽人文社會學刊，7(2)，191-205。
10. 漆昌柱(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。武漢市，武漢體育學院研究所。
11. 羅鴻仁、涂鵬斐、李凰慈(2011)。個人背景因素對大專棒球運動員人格特質之影響。雲科大體育，13，29-35。

1. 許吉越、翁文修、李坤哲、余信毅(2018)。高中桌球選手比賽技戰術分析。運動與遊憩研究，13(2)，116-129。
2. (2023)。勝敗場觀點分析奧運奪牌桌球選手競技表現之影響。運動教練科學，71，35-50。