羽球選手專項技術測驗及其競賽名次之關係

The Association between Specific Skill Battery Test and Competition Ranking among Badminton Players

10.6194/SCS.2017.48.04

王家閔(Chia-Min Wang)；連惟昱(Wei-Yuh Lian)；廖學松(Hsueh-Sung Laio)；張鳳菊(Feng-Chu Chang)

運動訓練 ； 專項技術測驗 ； 再測信度 ； sport training ； specific skill battery ； test-retest reliability

運動教練科學

48期（2017 / 12 / 01）

31 - 44

繁體中文

目的：為探討羽球選手專項技術測驗及競賽名次之關係。方法：研究對象為國立體育大學競技學院球類運動技術學系，且具備全國羽球協會甲組球員或乙組球員資格之16名男生羽球專長選手。採用120場循環賽比賽的競賽名次為基準，藉由17項羽球技術測驗探討發長球、發短球、網前小球、平球、網前推平球、長球、切球、殺球、五次直線進退跑、五次左右兩側跑及十次低重心四角跑等不同測驗項目之再測信度及競賽名次的關係。結果：男生羽球選手各項專項技術測驗項目之再測信度達顯著水準項目的有4項，分別為網前小球測驗正手拍、平球測驗正手拍、五次直線進退跑及十次低重心四角跑；後測成績與競賽成績達顯著相關之測驗項目為網前小球測驗反手拍共1項；競賽名次前8名與後8名選手在各項專項技術測驗項目皆無顯著差異。結論：羽球專項技術測驗部分項目與選手競賽名次有關係，建議可做為教練評鑑羽球訓練效果之測驗依據。

Purpose: This study was to examine the association between specific skill battery test and competition ranking among badminton players. Methods: Sixteen male players who recruited as subjects from the badminton team of Department of Sports Training- Balls of National Taiwan Sport University and were recognized as the major league and minor league from National Badminton Association were participants in this study. The 120 rounds of the race competition as a benchmark was used to explore the reliability in different specific skill battery test items, which included long serve, short serve, net flight, drive, driven flight, clear, cutting, smash, five straight forward running, five left and right sides running and ten low posture running around four corners, and the association between specific skill battery and competition ranking. Results: The results showed that the reliability in badminton male single players' specific skill battery test items had four items reaching significance, it included forehand net flight, forehand driven flight, five straight forward running and ten low posture running around four corners. The final badminton specific skill battery test and competition ranking had significant association in backhand net flight. Although the competition ranking, and specific skill battery had no significant difference between top eight players and the last eight players. Conclusions: The part of badminton specific skill battery and players' competition ranking had association; therefore, we recommended coaches could use this test to be a reference for evaluating their training effectiveness.

1. 洪欣正(2006)。羽球專項步法爆發力測量模式驗證性分析。大專體育學刊，8(2)，95-105。
   連結：
2. Hicks, J. V.(1967).TX,Texas Women's University.
3. Miller, F. A.(1951).A badminton wall volley test.Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation,22(2),208-213.
4. Royer, M. J.(1950).IA,University of Iowa.
5. 王文教、李永波、張家驊(1995)。中國體育教練員崗位培訓教材─羽毛球。北京市:人民體育。
6. 杜登明(1985)。羽球運動技能因子構造之分析研究。臺灣省體專學報，14，71-131。
7. 周宏室、胡天玫、吳慧君、盧俊宏、林威秀、紀世清(2013)。體育概論。臺中市:華格那。
8. 姚漢禱(1999)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
9. 紀世清(1998)。羽球選手專項技術測驗之研究。國立體育學院論叢，9(1)，219-240。
10. 紀世清(1999)。驗證性因素分析—國小羽球基本運動技術測驗之建構效度研究。1999年國際大專運動教練科學研討會，桃園縣:
11. 紀世清(2002)。羽球選手四角跑耐力測驗適當時間之探討。國立體育學院論叢，13(1)，275-282。
12. 紀世清(2001)。羽球運動技術內容結構之探討。國立體育學院論叢，11(2)，159-173。
13. 紀世清(1996)。羽球選手專項體能測驗項目之研究。國立體育學院論叢，6(2)，63-81。
14. 孫宜芬(1984)。羽球技能測驗之研究。師大體育，18，50-68。
15. 莊美鈴(1976)。羽球技術測驗項目編製之研究。中華民國大專學術研討會專刊
16. 楊繼美(1987)。女子羽球國手之生理心理特質與運動技能項目構造之分析研究。臺北市:淡江大學出版社。
17. 葉憲清(2003)。運動訓練法。臺北市:師大書苑。
18. 鄭清滿(1989)。五專男生羽球測驗項目之編製研究。臺北市:美新圖書。