英文摘要
|
Purpose: The People's Republic of China's table tennis team's achievements rank is amongst the best in the world. These achievements are highly correlated with the development of excellent coaches. Therefore, this study aims to compare the differences between coach training courses in Taiwan and in China. Methods: The text is described, analyzed juxtaposed, and compared by use of comparative research methods to four steps, which according to relevantly copies that diversifies table tennis coaching courses in Taiwan and in China to further compare and analyst. Results: The study found that there are differences in the purpose and content of training courses between Taiwan and China. First, with regard to the purpose of the training course: (1) All levels of coach training offered in China displayed a more clarified, distinct purpose. (2) Courses offered in China also displayed a clearer definition and classification with regards to the corresponding player's ability. Second, with regard to course content: (1) There were more emphasis on subject knowledge, such as sports psychology, exercise physiology, and nutrition, etc. and important issues, such as gender equality, banned drugs, etc. in Taiwan; whilst China places emphasis on sport specific knowledge, such as special materials, foundational skills, and footwork. (2) China's course content further developed in depth and generalizability as the intensity/level of course work increases, whereas Taiwanese courses displayed lower levels of extensibility and higher levels of repeatability. (3) Taiwan's curriculum content was tailored for coaches with prior basic skills, but China's curriculum established a foundation for coaches with no prior skill-based training. Conclusion and Suggestion: First, there is a need to investigate the demand for professional ability of Taiwanese coaches to build complete training courses using evidence-based data. Second, the planning of workshops can increase training qualifications for coaches and create opportunities for professional exchange and networking. Lastly, there is a need for coaches to obtain a training license which corresponds to their player's ability level.
|
参考文献
|
-
李宜芳,劉宇,陳嘉遠,黃韻靜,林文郎(2003)。大陸運動教練培育制度之研究。體育學報,35,267-277。
連結:
-
周財勝,張雅棻(2008)。羽球運動教練所具有專業能力之探討。大專體育,99,163-171。
連結:
-
高嬅,林靜萍(2017)。兩岸羽球教練培育系統之比較。中華體育季刊,31(1),7-14。
連結:
-
陳九州(2005)。大陸田徑「教練員崗位培訓」制度之探討。北體學報,13,240-247。
連結:
-
陳建利,陳淑滿,王明月(2012)。臺灣桌球教練專業能力之探析。大專體育,121,53-59。
連結:
-
黃有傑,張瑜娟(2012)。解說人員專業能力指標建立之研究。運動與遊憩研究,6(4),77-92。
連結:
-
潘義祥(2010)。高中體育教師專業指標之建構與驗證。大專體育學刊,12(3),11-23。
連結:
-
盧心雨(2011)。跳水教練工作經驗與歷程之研究。臺灣運動心理學報,19,1-22。
連結:
-
Bereday, G. Z. F.(1964).Comparative method in education.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
-
Lysaght, R. M.,Altschuld, J. W.(2000).Beyond initial certification: The assessment and maintenance of competency in professions.Evaluation and Program Planning,23(1),95-104.
-
中華民國桌球協會(2016)。中華民國桌球協會(2016a)。中華民國桌球協會 106 年度 A(國家)級教練講習會手冊。臺北市:作者。
-
中華民國桌球協會(2016)。中華民國桌球協會(2016b)。中華民國桌球協會 106 年度 B 級教練講習會手冊。臺北市:作者。
-
中華民國桌球協會(2016)。中華民國桌球協會(2016c)。中華民國桌球協會 106 年度 C 級教練講習會手冊。臺北市:作者。
-
王毓健(2016,3 月 5 日 )。世桌賽男退女進應管理移訓取代集中人員。蘋果新聞網。資料引自 https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20160305/809495
-
李瑞艷(2014,8 月 5 日)。臺灣臺南桌球館學生一行到湖北參加集訓。中國臺灣網。資料引自 http://www.taiwan.cn/local/dfkx/201408/t20140805_6851114.html
-
徐增琪(2005).大陸體育教練員崗位培訓教材—乒乓球.北京市:人民體育出版社.
-
教育部(2013).體育運動政策白皮書.臺北市:教育部.
-
許惠明(2005)。,桃園市:南亞技術學院。
-
陳進祥(2009)。桌球運動教練專業能力之探討。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,8(3),282-292。
-
楊金昌(2015)。淺談提升學校專任運動教練專業知能之策略。學校體育,151,44-59。
-
劉雅玲(2013)。乒乓球教練員崗位培訓教學構想。中國體育教練員,3,43-44。
-
歐陽金樹(2001)。中國大陸教練員崗位培訓進展與現況。大專體育學術專刊,90,237-247。
-
鄭志富(1996)。體育運動管理人員專業能力之探討。中華體育季刊,10(3),8-17。
-
謝瓊雲(2018,7 月 12 日)。兩岸體育交流彰縣桌球小將赴重慶移地訓練 3 週。中國時報新聞網。資料引自 https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180712002808-260405?chdtv
|