台灣金融監理的政治邏輯

The Political Logic of Financial Supervision in Taiwan

顏維婷(Yen Wei-Ting)

台灣 ； 金融監理 ； 金融全球化 ； 國際金融社群 ； 官僚 ； Taiwan ； financial supervision ； financial globalization ； international financial community ； bureaucracy

台灣國際法季刊

14卷1期（2017 / 03 / 01）

103 - 134

繁體中文

本篇文章探究台灣的金融監理規範如何在全球層次與國家層次的互動中改革，以及改革進程如何受舊有威權體制的遺緒影響。在台灣的故事中，金融監理改革受金融全球化壓力而啟動，不過這個壓力並非由外而內輸進台灣，而是國家主觀理解到全球化對台灣可能帶來的衝擊，先發制人地進行改革，以宣示台灣加入國際金融社群的決心。不過，雖然監理改革由政治菁英有意識的發動，但實際執行者都是國家官僚。由於台灣的金融產業長期受國家掌控，國家官僚主觀上並不認為需要改革監理體系來增進監理效率，導致金融監理改革缺乏所需政治動能，最後雖在樣貌上出現一個類似合併監理的單一組織，但必沒有實質上的改變。

This paper explores the financial supervisory reform in Taiwan and how it was as an outcome of both international and domestic level factors, including the influence of authoritarian legacy. In Taiwan's story, the initiation of the financial supervisory reform was indeed influenced by the pressure of financial globalization; however, the pressure was not transited through an outside-in route. Rather, the state began the reform in the knowledge of the shocks that globalization might bring. The move represented the states determination to show that it was well-prepared to join the international financial community. Although the reform was initiated by political elites, the legislative process was led by the state bureaucracy. Since the financial industry has been under the control of the state for a long time, the state has always prevailed over the market. Therefore, for bureaucrats, there was no need to reform the supervisory system since the system itself was efficient, resulting in a lack of political momentum during the reform process. Consequently, the financial supervisor y reform was eventually passed due to electoral considerations. In appearance, a new single organization emerged out of the reform. However, little has changed in essence.

1. Cheng, Tun-Jen(1993).Guarding the Commanding Heights: The State as Banker in Taiwan.The Politics of Finance in Developing Countries,Ithaca:
2. Goodhart, Charles,Hartmann, Philipp,Llewellyn, David,Rojas-Suarez, Liliana,Weisbrod, Steven(1998).Financial Regulation: Why, how and where now?.London:Routledge.
3. Haggard, Stephan(2000).The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis.Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics.
4. McNamara, Kathleen R.(2002).Rational Fictions : Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation.West European Politics,25(1),47-76.
5. Pempel, T.J.(ed.)(1999).The politics of the Asian economic crisis.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
6. Pierson, Paul(2000).Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics.American Political Science Review,94(2),251-267.
7. Thurbon, Elizabeth(2001).Two Paths to Financial Liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan.The Pacific Review,14(2),241-267.
8. Whitehead, Laurence(ed.)(2002).Emerging Market Democracies: East Asia and Latin America.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. 刁曼蓬(1999)。邱正雄談米酒、彩券、立委金檢。天下雜誌，218，214-217。
10. 于宗先、王金利(2005)。台灣金融體制之演變。台北:聯經。
11. 王宏仁編、李廣均編、龔宜君編(2008)。跨戒：流動與堅持的台灣社會。台北:群學。
12. 王耀興(1986)。光復以來我國金融制度與金融政策的檢討。臺北市:財政部金融司。
13. 余致力編(2001)。公共政策分析的理論與實務。台北:韋伯文化。
14. 吳忠及編(1989)。壟斷與剝削：威權主義的政治經濟分析。台北:財團法人台灣研究基金會。
15. 吳芳怡(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學硏究所。
16. 吳泉源(1993)。金融自由化的迷思: 一個經濟社會學的考察。臺灣社會研究，15，1-37。
17. 李宗榮(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，東海大學東海大學社會學研究所。
18. 李雪雯(1997)。邱正雄：這波金融危機，我們處理得最好。商業周刊，523，74。
19. 林寶安(2004)。,高雄:義守大學公共政策與管理學系。
20. 劉進慶(1993)。臺灣戰後經濟分析。台北:人間。
21. 蕭文生(2000)。中央銀行與金融監理：自法律觀點論起。台北:元照。
22. 賴英照(1997)。台灣金融版圖之回顧與前瞻。台北:聯經出版社。
23. 韓仕賢(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，政治大學勞工研究所。

1. (2024).Populism in Taiwan: Rethinking the Neo-liberalism–Populism Nexus.Journal of Contemporary Asia,54(3),478-501.