育有接受早期療育早產兒之父母對偶親職參與之研究

Study on Parental Involvement of Couples Raising Premature Children Who Receive Early Intervention Services

賴金滿(Chin-Man Lai)；孫海倫(Hai-lum Sun)

早產兒 ； 早期療育 ； 親職參與 ； Early intervention ； Premature ； Parental involvement

若瑟醫護雜誌

13卷1期（2019 / 06 / 01）

7 - 22

繁體中文

目的：某醫學中心育有接受早期療育早產兒之父母對偶親職參與之相關因素探討。方法：採立意取樣，自台中某醫學中心徵求40對共80位育有0－6歲、需要接受早期療育早產兒父親及母親填寫「早產兒及父母親基本資料調查表」、「親職參與量表」共二份問卷，並且將回收後的問卷進行分析。結果：在親職參與行為次量表的得分情形，以情感性行為較多，其次是工具性行為，最少的是責任性行為，顯示早產兒親職參與行為在情感性行為有較高度的參與，其次是工具性行為，在責任性行為則較低。研究結果亦顯示父親的參與程度在工具性行為、情感性行為、責任性行為都會因為是否陪伴幼兒去接受療育而有顯著的差異；母親的參與程度在工具性行為、情感性行為會因為母親的教育程度及目前家庭收入是否符合開銷有顯著的差異，責任性行為會因為目前家庭收入是否符合開銷而有顯著的差異。結論：1.親職參與行為的得分平均值介於2.84～3.65，表示接受療育早產兒父母親職參與程度屬於中度參與。2.父親在親職參與行為次量表，以情感性行為較多，其次是工具性行為，較少參與的是責任性行為；母親在親職參與行為次量表的得分情形，以工具性行為參與較多，其次是情感性行為，較少參與的是責任性行為。

Purposes: This study is intended to explore the parental involvement of parents whose premature babies are engaged in early intervention services. Methods: The research was carried out by means of purposive sampling. At a medical center in Taichung, eighty parents (forty in pairs) whose premature children are under six years old and engaged in early intervention programs were requested to complete two questionnaires, including Background Information of Premature Babies and Parents and Evaluation of Parental Involvement. Results: Further analysis showed that the majority of parental involvement behavior is affective, following by instrumental and the least one is obligatory. For father, who accompany their children with the early intervention services or not significantly influenced the level of father's involvement including affective, instrumental and obligatory behavior. As for the mother's involvement, the level of education and the household income had a significant influence on the instrumental and affective behavior. For obligatory behavior also significant related to household income and expenditure. Conclusions: 1.The average of parental involvement behaviors falls between scores 2.84~3.65 according to the result of questionnaires, which indicates a medium level of parental involvement.2.The most paternal involvement is emotional involvement. Follow by instrumental involvement and then responsible involvement.

1. 李佩珍,郭素珍,鄧森文(2003)。台灣地區嬰兒出生體重與妊娠週數分佈之長期變化趨勢。台灣衛誌，22(5)，376-385。
   連結：
2. 陳富美,利翠珊(2004)。同情感組型夫妻在家事分工上的差異─對偶資料的分析。應用心理研究，2004(24)，95-115。
   連結：
3. 傅秀媚(2002)。早期療育中跨專業團隊評估模式相關問題研究。特殊教育學報，16，1-22。
   連結：
4. 身心障礙者保護法。2004。
5. Bowes, W A(2005).Behavioral outcomes and evidence of psychopathology among very-low-birth-weight infants at age 20 years.Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey,60,221-222.
6. Cooke, RWI,Foulder Hughes, L(2003).Growth impairment in the very preterm and cognitive and motor performance at 7 years.Archives of Disease in Childhood,88,482-487.
7. Evensen, K,Vik, T,Helbostad, J(2004).Motor skills in adolescents with low birth weight.Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition,89,451-455.
8. Holsti, L,Grunau, R,Whitfield, M(2002).Developmental coordination disorder in extremely low birth weight chil-dren at nine years.Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics,23,9-15.
9. Lamb, ME(1997).The Role of The Father in Child Development.U. S.:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
10. Liebhardt, G,Sontheimer, D,Linder-kamp, O(2000).Visual-motor function of very low birth weight and full-term children at 3 1/2 to 4 years of age.Early Human Development,57(1),33-47.
11. McBride, BA,Rane, TR(1998).Parenting alliance as a predictor father involvement: An exploratory study.Family Relations,47,229-236.
12. Powls, A,Botting, N,Cooke, R(1996).Growth impairment in very low birt-hweight children at 12 years: Correl-ation with perinatal and outcome Variables.Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition,75,152-157.
13. Saigal, S,Hoult, L. A,Streiner, D. L(2000).School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight.Pediatrics,105,325-331.
14. Stathis, S.L,O'Callaghan, M,Harvey, J(1999).Head circumference in ELBW babies is associated with lea-rning difficulties and cognition but not ADHD in the school-aged child.Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology,41,375-380.
15. Takimoto, H,Yokoyama, T,Yoshiike, N(2005).Increase in low-birth-weight infants in Japan and associated risk factors.The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research,31(4),314-322.
16. 中華民國發展遲緩兒童基金會(2002).發展遲緩兒童早期療育工作手冊.
17. 王曉萍(2005)。台北市，台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系。
18. 早產兒基金會:認識早產。早產兒基金會網站 2013.6.8 。 Available http://www.pbf.org.tw/newhtml/C.htm
19. 朱鳳英(2007)。臺北市早期療育服務社區照顧經驗。護理雜誌，54(5)，18-23。
20. 吳蕙惠(2008)。台北市，國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所。
21. 杜宜展(2003)。台南市，臺南師範學院國民教育學系。
22. 孟瑛如(1997)。不要輸在起跑點：談早期療育的重要性。新幼教，15，4-9。
23. 林佩琪(2009)。台中市，靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系。
24. 洪漢陽(1999).臨床新生兒科學.臺北:嘉洲.
25. 翁菁菁,鄒國蘇(2005)。三歲以下發展遲緩兒童之臨床特徵。北市醫學雜誌，2(6)，535-544。
26. 張耐(2003)。早期療育中的親職教育。師友月刊，430，30-33。
27. 陳凱琳(2000)。高雄市，高雄醫學大學健康科學院行為科學研究所。
28. 黃琇櫻(2007)。台中市，東海大學社會工作系。